Cao Huiling, Ming Li, Chen Long, Zhu Xingwang, Shi Yuan
Department of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Chongqing, China.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Sep 27;8:641429. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.641429. eCollection 2021.
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), sweeping across the world, has created a worldwide pandemic. Effective treatments of COVID-19 are extremely urgent. To analyze the efficacy and safety of convalescent plasma (CCP) on patients with COVID-19. All the relevant studies were searched from PubMed, EMBASE,Cochrane library, Scopus, Web of Science, CBM, CNKI, Wan fang, VIP, Medrxiv, Biorxiv, and SSRN on July 19, 2021. PICOS criteria were as follows: (P) the study interests were human subjects with the infection of COVID-19; (I) the intervention of interest was CCP; (C) comparator treatments contained placebo, sham therapy, and standard treatment; (O) the primary outcome was mortality rates by the novel coronavirus. The secondary outcomes included the incidence of serious adverse events, the rate of ICU admission and mechanical ventilation (MV); the length of hospital stay; the duration of MV and ICU stay; the antibody levels, inflammatory factor levels, and viral loads. (S) Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of CCP were included. Subanalysis, quality assessment, sensitive analysis, and publication bias were conducted by two reviewers independently. Sixteen RCTs were included and enrolled a total of 16,296 participants in this meta-analysis. The pooled data showed that no significant difference was observed in reducing the rate of overall mortality between CCP treatment group and placebo group (OR 0.96; 95% CI 0.90 to 1.03; = 0.30; = 6%). According to the results of subgroup analysis, severe or critical patients with CCP showed significant difference in reducing the 28-day mortality of compared with placebo (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.93, = 0.02, = 0%). CCP groups have a significantly shorter duration of MV compared with the control group (weighted MD -1.00, 95% CI -1.86 to -0.14 d = 0.02, = 0%). No significant difference was observed in the length of hospital stay, the duration of ICU, and the rate of ICU and MV. There is no conclusive evidence about the safety of CCP. Convalescent plasma can significantly reduce the 28-day mortality of severe or critical COVID-19 patients and the duration of MV. However, more evidence was needed to prove the safety of convalescent plasma.
2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)席卷全球,造成了一场全球大流行。COVID-19的有效治疗迫在眉睫。为分析康复期血浆(CCP)对COVID-19患者的疗效和安全性。于2021年7月19日在PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆、Scopus、科学网、中国生物医学文献数据库、中国知网、万方、维普、Medrxiv、Biorxiv和SSRN上检索了所有相关研究。PICOS标准如下:(P)研究对象为感染COVID-19的人类受试者;(I)感兴趣的干预措施为CCP;(C)对照治疗包括安慰剂、假治疗和标准治疗;(O)主要结局为新型冠状病毒导致的死亡率。次要结局包括严重不良事件的发生率、入住重症监护病房(ICU)和机械通气(MV)的比例;住院时间;MV和ICU住院时间;抗体水平、炎症因子水平和病毒载量。(S)仅纳入CCP的随机对照试验(RCT)。由两名 reviewers 独立进行亚组分析、质量评估、敏感性分析和发表偏倚分析。本荟萃分析纳入了16项RCT,共纳入16296名参与者。汇总数据显示,CCP治疗组和安慰剂组在降低总死亡率方面未观察到显著差异(OR 0.96;95% CI 0.90至1.03;P = 0.30;I² = 6%)。根据亚组分析结果,CCP治疗的重症或危重症患者与安慰剂相比,在降低28天死亡率方面存在显著差异(OR 0.58,95% CI 0.36至0.93,P = 0.02,I² = 0%)。与对照组相比,CCP组的MV持续时间明显更短(加权MD -1.00,95% CI -1.86至-0.14天,P = 0.02,I² = 0%)。在住院时间、ICU持续时间以及ICU和MV比例方面未观察到显著差异。关于CCP的安全性尚无确凿证据。康复期血浆可显著降低重症或危重症COVID-19患者的28天死亡率和MV持续时间。然而,需要更多证据来证明康复期血浆的安全性。