Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Nat Commun. 2021 May 27;12(1):3189. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23469-2.
In a randomized clinical trial of 86 hospitalized COVID-19 patients comparing standard care to treatment with 300mL convalescent plasma containing high titers of neutralizing SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, no overall clinical benefit was observed. Using a comprehensive translational approach, we unravel the virological and immunological responses following treatment to disentangle which COVID-19 patients may benefit and should be the focus of future studies. Convalescent plasma is safe, does not improve survival, has no effect on the disease course, nor does plasma enhance viral clearance in the respiratory tract, influence SARS-CoV-2 antibody development or serum proinflammatory cytokines levels. Here, we show that the vast majority of patients already had potent neutralizing SARS-CoV-2 antibodies at hospital admission and with comparable titers to carefully selected plasma donors. This resulted in the decision to terminate the trial prematurely. Treatment with convalescent plasma should be studied early in the disease course or at least preceding autologous humoral response development.
在一项针对 86 名住院 COVID-19 患者的随机临床试验中,将标准治疗与含有高滴度中和 SARS-CoV-2 抗体的 300mL 恢复期血浆治疗进行比较,未观察到总体临床获益。我们采用综合转化方法,研究治疗后的病毒学和免疫学反应,以厘清哪些 COVID-19 患者可能受益,并应成为未来研究的重点。恢复期血浆是安全的,不会提高生存率,对疾病进程没有影响,也不会增强呼吸道中的病毒清除,影响 SARS-CoV-2 抗体的产生或血清促炎细胞因子水平。在这里,我们表明,绝大多数患者在入院时已经具有强大的中和 SARS-CoV-2 抗体,且与精心挑选的血浆供体的滴度相当。这导致提前决定终止试验。恢复期血浆的治疗应在疾病早期进行研究,或者至少在自身体液免疫反应发展之前进行。