Suppr超能文献

理解犹豫不决:两个自我报告问卷的维度及其与抑郁和犹豫不决的关系。

Understanding indecisiveness: Dimensionality of two self-report questionnaires and associations with depression and indecision.

机构信息

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences.

出版信息

Psychol Assess. 2022 Feb;34(2):176-187. doi: 10.1037/pas0001072. Epub 2021 Oct 14.

Abstract

Indecisiveness is a prevalent and impairing symptom among individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD). However, the use of different self-report questionnaires and factor analysis methods in past research has been a barrier to understanding the nature of indecisiveness in depression. Addressing these barriers could help to elucidate the dimensionality and validity of indecisiveness questionnaires, which in turn would clarify the relation of indecisiveness to depression. In our study of an online sample of adults ( = 602), we administered two commonly used indecisiveness questionnaires, a depressive symptom questionnaire, and a behavioral task assessing indecision. Through confirmatory factor analysis, we found that the combined indecisiveness questionnaires were best characterized by a two-factor model, with one factor corresponding to straightforwardly worded items and the other corresponding to reverse-scored items. Based on post hoc analyses involving tests of discriminant validity, we think that these two factors represent indecisiveness and decision-making confidence, respectively. Indecisiveness, but not decision-making confidence, was strongly associated with depressive symptoms. Indecisiveness was also strongly associated with behavioral indecision, a finding that helps to validate indecisiveness as a construct. We posit that the assessment of indecisiveness could be enhanced by excluding the reverse-scored items because they appear to represent decision-making confidence, a distinct construct from indecisiveness. Excluding the reverse-scored items revealed a robust link between indecisiveness and depressive symptoms, highlighting the importance of targeting this symptom in depression research. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

犹豫不决是患有重度抑郁症(MDD)个体的一种常见且具有损害性的症状。然而,过去研究中使用不同的自陈式问卷和因素分析方法一直是理解抑郁中犹豫不决本质的障碍。解决这些障碍有助于阐明犹豫不决问卷的维度和有效性,进而阐明犹豫不决与抑郁之间的关系。在我们对成年人在线样本(n=602)的研究中,我们使用了两种常用的犹豫不决问卷、一种抑郁症状问卷和一种评估犹豫不决的行为任务。通过验证性因素分析,我们发现综合犹豫不决问卷最好由一个两因素模型来描述,一个因素对应于直截了当的项目,另一个因素对应于反向评分的项目。基于涉及判别有效性测试的事后分析,我们认为这两个因素分别代表犹豫不决和决策信心。犹豫不决,而不是决策信心,与抑郁症状强烈相关。犹豫不决也与行为上的犹豫不决强烈相关,这一发现有助于验证犹豫不决作为一种结构的有效性。我们假设通过排除反向评分的项目可以增强犹豫不决的评估,因为它们似乎代表了决策信心,这是一个与犹豫不决不同的结构。排除反向评分的项目揭示了犹豫不决和抑郁症状之间的强烈联系,突出了在抑郁研究中针对这一症状的重要性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验