J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 Jun;150(6):1070. doi: 10.1037/xge0001086.
Reports the retraction of ""That's bitter!": Culture-specific effects of gustatory experience on judgments of fairness and advancement" by Jialiang Xu, Fang Wan and Norbert Schwarz (, Advanced Online Publication, Oct 29, 2020, np). The following article is being retracted: Xu, J., Wan, F., & Schwarz, N. (2020, October 29). "That's bitter!": Culture-specific effects of gustatory experience on judgments of fairness and advancement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1037/xge0000985 A user of the open science data sets accompanying the article noticed confounds between culture condition or treatment condition and sex of participants in studies 3, 4, and 5. What caused these confounds could not be fully reconstructed. The first and second authors, who handled data collection, assume that the confounds resulted from a confluence of two decisions. First, students were recruited through campus advertisements and encouraged to bring friends, which resulted in the arrival of mostly same-sex groups. Second, in deviation from standard protocol, the administration of the taste tests was simplified in these studies by administering the same treatment to all participants who arrived together. Hence, the authors asked for a retraction..... (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2020-80845-001.) In English, unfair treatment and social injustice are often described as "bitter" experiences, whereas "eating bitterness" refers to endurance in the face of hardship in Chinese. This suggests that bitter taste may ground experiences of adversity in both cultures, but in culture-specific forms. We tested this possibility by assessing Canadian and Chinese participants' responses to fairness and achievement scenarios after incidental exposure to bitter or neutral tastes. Tasting something bitter increased self-reported motivation and intention to invest effort for Chinese participants, but not Anglo-Canadian participants (Studies 1, 4, 5). Tasting something bitter decreased perceived fairness for Anglo-Canadian participants (Studies 1-3) but not Chinese participants living in China (Study 2). The fairness judgments of Chinese participants living in Canada shed light on adaptation to the host culture: Bitter taste decreased these participants' fairness judgments after living in Canada for 4 years or more (Study 4), provided they were tested in English (Studies 3-4), but exerted no influence when they were tested in Chinese (Study 4). The observed cultural differences are compatible with a relatively higher emphasis on self-improvement in China versus self-enhancement in Canada. Supporting this conjecture, the fairness judgments of Chinese students in Canada followed the Anglo-Canadian pattern when primed with a self-enhancement motive and the effort judgments of Anglo-Canadian students followed the Chinese pattern when primed with a self-improvement motive (Study 5). This suggest that a universal aversive experience (bitter taste) grounds thought about adversity in ways compatible with cultural orientations and reflected in culture-specific metaphors. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
报道撤回Jialiang Xu、Fang Wan和Norbert Schwarz所著的《“那很苦!”:味觉体验对公平和进步判断的文化特异性影响》(, 高级在线发表,2020年10月29日,np)。以下文章正在被撤回:Xu, J., Wan, F., & Schwarz, N. (2020年10月29日)。《“那很苦!”:味觉体验对公平和进步判断的文化特异性影响》。《实验心理学杂志:总论》。高级在线发表。http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xge0000985 该文章所附开放科学数据集的一位用户注意到研究3、4和5中文化条件或处理条件与参与者性别之间存在混淆。导致这些混淆的原因无法完全重构。负责数据收集的第一和第二作者认为,这些混淆是由两个决定共同作用导致的。首先,通过校园广告招募学生并鼓励他们带朋友来,这导致大多是同性群体前来。其次,与标准方案不同,在这些研究中,通过对一起到达的所有参与者给予相同处理简化了味觉测试的管理。因此,作者要求撤回……(原始文章的以下摘要出现在记录2020 - 80845 - 001中。)在英语中,不公平待遇和社会不公正通常被描述为“苦涩”的经历,而在中文里“吃苦”指的是面对困难时的忍耐。这表明苦味可能在两种文化中都为逆境体验奠定基础,但形式具有文化特异性。我们通过评估加拿大和中国参与者在偶然接触苦味或中性味道后对公平和成就情景的反应来检验这种可能性。品尝苦味会增加中国参与者自我报告的动力和投入努力的意愿,但对英裔加拿大参与者则不然(研究1、4、5)。品尝苦味会降低英裔加拿大参与者对公平的感知(研究1 - 3),但对生活在中国的中国参与者则不然(研究2)。生活在加拿大的中国参与者的公平判断揭示了对东道国文化的适应:在加拿大生活4年或更长时间后,苦味会降低这些参与者的公平判断(研究4),前提是他们用英语进行测试(研究3 - 4),但当用中文进行测试时则没有影响(研究4)。观察到的文化差异与中国相对更强调自我提升而加拿大更强调自我增强相一致。支持这一推测的是,当以自我增强动机启动时,加拿大的中国学生的公平判断遵循英裔加拿大模式,而当以自我提升动机启动时,英裔加拿大学生的努力判断遵循中国模式(研究5)。这表明一种普遍的厌恶体验(苦味)以与文化取向相符的方式为关于逆境的思考奠定基础,并反映在特定文化的隐喻中。(PsycInfo数据库记录 (c) 2021美国心理学会,保留所有权利)