Alotaibi Hind, Aljurf Mahmoud, de Latour Regis, Alfayez Mansour, Bacigalupo Andrea, Fakih Riad El, Schrezenmeier Hubert, Ahmed Syed Osman, Gluckman Eliane, Iqbal Shahid, Höchsmann Britta, Halkes Constantijn, de la Fuente Josu, Alshehry Nawal, Cesaro Simone, Passweg Jakob, Dufour Carlo, Risitano Antonio M, DiPersio John, Motabi Ibraheem
Department of Hematology, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Hematology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Transplant Cell Ther. 2022 Feb;28(2):105.e1-105.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2021.10.006. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
Idiopathic aplastic anemia is a rare and life-threatening disorder, and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) from a matched sibling donor (MSD) is the standard treatment strategy for young patients. Alternative donor transplantation (ADT) from a matched unrelated donor or an HLA haploidentical donor is not commonly used in the frontline setting. This systematic review/meta-analysis was conducted to compare ADT as an upfront, rather than delayed, treatment strategy in the absence of an MSD to immunosuppressive therapy (IST) in severe aplastic anemia (SAA). We searched PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase (1998 to 2019) for studies that compared the outcomes of ADT with IST as upfront therapy in patients with SAA. We included studies with 5 patients or more in each arm. Studies that included patients with inherited forms of bone marrow failure syndromes were excluded. The primary outcome was the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate. Five studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled 5-year odds ratio (OR) for OS was statistically significant at 0.44 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23 to 0.85) in favor of upfront ADT. In addition, survival was compared between upfront ADT versus salvage ADT in 6 studies. The pooled 5-year OR for OS was statistically significant at 0.31 (95% CI, 0.15 to 0.64) in favor of upfront ADT. Although this analysis has some limitations, including the retrospective nature of the included studies, the lack of ethnic diversity, the predominantly pediatric population, and the relatively suboptimal IST regimen used in some of the studies, it indicates that upfront ADT is a potential alternative treatment option in young and pediatric SAA patients who lack an HLA identical sibling donor, particularly when optimal IST is not available. © 2021 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc.
特发性再生障碍性贫血是一种罕见且危及生命的疾病,来自匹配同胞供者(MSD)的造血干细胞移植(HSCT)是年轻患者的标准治疗策略。来自匹配无关供者或HLA单倍型相同供者的替代供者移植(ADT)在一线治疗中并不常用。本系统评价/荟萃分析旨在比较在无MSD的情况下,将ADT作为重度再生障碍性贫血(SAA)的初始而非延迟治疗策略与免疫抑制治疗(IST)的疗效。我们检索了PubMed/MEDLINE和Embase(1998年至2019年),以查找比较ADT与IST作为SAA患者初始治疗疗效的研究。我们纳入了每组至少5例患者的研究。排除纳入了遗传性骨髓衰竭综合征患者的研究。主要结局是5年总生存率(OS)。五项研究符合纳入标准并被纳入本荟萃分析。OS的合并5年比值比(OR)为0.44,具有统计学意义(95%置信区间[CI],0.23至0.85),支持初始ADT治疗。此外,在6项研究中比较了初始ADT与挽救性ADT的生存率。OS的合并5年OR为0.31,具有统计学意义(95%CI,0.15至0.64),支持初始ADT治疗。尽管该分析存在一些局限性,包括纳入研究的回顾性性质、缺乏种族多样性、主要为儿科人群以及部分研究中使用的IST方案相对欠佳,但这表明对于缺乏HLA相同同胞供者的年轻和儿科SAA患者,初始ADT是一种潜在的替代治疗选择,尤其是在无法获得最佳IST治疗时。©2021美国移植与细胞治疗学会。由爱思唯尔公司出版。