College of Healthcare Sciences (Physiotherapy), James Cook University, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia; and Corresponding author. Email:
School of Health Sciences (Physiotherapy), University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.
Aust J Prim Health. 2021 Oct;27(5):339-349. doi: 10.1071/PY20193.
A user-led organisation (ULO) may be defined as an organisation that is run and controlled by the people who use the services provided by that organisation. ULOs provide services to their members, such as information, advice, support, treatment and training. ULOs may also be involved in advocacy, influencing local service provision, government policy and public perceptions of disability. This scoping review concentrated on health outcomes achieved by ULOs for people with disabilities, including physical, sensory, cognitive, intellectual, neurological or mental health impairments. Based on a search of the academic literature up to 30 June 2020, 26 articles were included. Twenty-four articles were on ULOs for mood disorders, schizophrenia or psychosis, and there was one article each on ULOs for cross-disability and chronic non-malignant pain. There was some evidence that peer-run and inclusive ULOs for members with mood disorders, schizophrenia or psychosis can reduce the number of times people with these illnesses access traditional mental health services. There was no evidence that ULOs can replace traditional mental health services. Therefore, ULOs for mood disorders, schizophrenia or psychosis could be considered an adjunct to traditional mental health services, not a replacement. For other disabilities, a lack of evidence means that no recommendation can be made. However, the organisational structure of ULOs may be as important as the support and services offered.
用户主导的组织(ULO)可以定义为由使用该组织提供的服务的人来运营和控制的组织。ULO 为其成员提供服务,例如信息、建议、支持、治疗和培训。ULO 还可能参与宣传、影响当地服务提供、政府政策和公众对残疾的看法。本范围综述集中于 ULO 为残疾人士实现的健康结果,包括身体、感官、认知、智力、神经或心理健康障碍。根据截至 2020 年 6 月 30 日对学术文献的搜索,共纳入了 26 篇文章。其中 24 篇是关于 ULO 治疗情绪障碍、精神分裂症或精神病的,还有一篇是关于 ULO 治疗跨残疾和慢性非恶性疼痛的。有一些证据表明,针对情绪障碍、精神分裂症或精神病患者的同伴运营和包容的 ULO 可以减少这些患者访问传统心理健康服务的次数。没有证据表明 ULO 可以替代传统的心理健康服务。因此,针对情绪障碍、精神分裂症或精神病的 ULO 可以被视为传统心理健康服务的辅助手段,而不是替代手段。对于其他残疾,缺乏证据意味着无法提出建议。然而,ULO 的组织结构可能与提供的支持和服务同样重要。