Suppr超能文献

成人心血管手术中对比 Del Nido 心脏停搏液与含血心脏停搏液:单次剂量心脏停搏液技术真的有优势吗?

Comparison of del Nido Cardioplegia vs. blood cardioplegia in adult aortic surgery: Is the single-dose cardioplegia technique really advantageous?

机构信息

University of Health Sciences, Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital, Department of Cardiovasculer Surgery, Mimar Sinan Town. Emniyet Street, Yıldırım, BURSA, Turkey.

出版信息

Asian J Surg. 2022 May;45(5):1122-1127. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.09.032. Epub 2021 Oct 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

/objective: The aim of the present study was to compare the operative and early postoperative results of the use of del Nido Cardioplegia solution (dNCS) with traditional blood cardioplegia (BC) in adult aortic surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective single-center study was performed on 118 patients who underwent aortic surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) between January 2016 and June 2020. Patients were divided in to two groups according to the type of cardioplegia solution used. Cardiac arrest was achieved in Group 1 (n = 65) with traditional BC and in Group 2 (n = 53) with dNCS. Operative and postoperative outcomes of the patients were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Patient demographic characteristics were similar between the two groups. dNCS group showed significantly lower aortic cross-clamp (ACC) time (73.3 vs. 87.5 min, P = 0.001), cardioplegia volume (1323.9 ± 368.5 vs. 2773.8 ± 453.8 ml, P< 0.001), defibrillation rate (44.4%vs. 69.2%, P = 0.006), drainage amount (412 ± 73.2 vs. 446.9 ± 95.1 ml, P = 0.026) and inotropic support need (37% vs. 55.3%, P = 0.046). Also dNCS group had significantly lower high sensitive troponin I (hsTnI) levels at 6th (203.5 ± 68.6 vs. 275.7 ± 76.2 ng/L, P< 0.001) and 24th (253.1 ± 101 vs. 293.4 ± 80.1 ng/L, P = 0.017) postoperative hours. And dNCS group showed significantly higher hematocrit levels at 6th (25.1 ± 3.2 vs. 22.5 ± 2.5%, P< 0.001) and 24th (25.8 ± 2.7 vs. 24.6 ± 2.8%, P = 0.024) postoperative hours. Times of intensive care unit stay, durations of intuabation and hospital stay times were similar in both groups. There was no significant difference in terms of postoperative ejection fraction values (P = 0.714).

CONCLUSION

Compared with conventional BC, dNCS provided significantly shorter ACC times, reduced the need for intraoperative defibrillation, lowered postoperative hsTnI levels with comparable early clinical outcomes for adult patients undergoing aortic surgery. dNCS is a safe and efficient alternative to the traditional BC solution in adult aortic cardiac surgery.

摘要

背景

目的:本研究旨在比较在成人主动脉手术中使用 Del Nido 心脏停搏液(dNCS)与传统冷血心脏停搏(BC)的手术和早期术后结果。

方法

回顾性分析 2016 年 1 月至 2020 年 6 月期间在体外循环(CPB)下行主动脉手术的 118 例患者的单中心资料。根据使用的心脏停搏液类型,将患者分为两组。在第 1 组(n=65)中使用传统 BC 实现心脏停搏,在第 2 组(n=53)中使用 dNCS 实现心脏停搏。比较两组患者的手术和术后结果。

结果

两组患者的人口统计学特征相似。dNCS 组的主动脉阻断时间(ACC)明显缩短(73.3 分钟 vs. 87.5 分钟,P=0.001),心脏停搏液用量(1323.9±368.5 毫升 vs. 2773.8±453.8 毫升,P<0.001)、除颤率(44.4% vs. 69.2%,P=0.006)、引流量(412±73.2 毫升 vs. 446.9±95.1 毫升,P=0.026)和正性肌力支持需要(37% vs. 55.3%,P=0.046)均较低。dNCS 组的术后 6 小时(203.5±68.6 纳克/升 vs. 275.7±76.2 纳克/升,P<0.001)和 24 小时(253.1±101 纳克/升 vs. 293.4±80.1 纳克/升,P=0.017)的高敏肌钙蛋白 I(hsTnI)水平也显著降低。术后 6 小时(25.1±3.2% vs. 22.5±2.5%,P<0.001)和 24 小时(25.8±2.7% vs. 24.6±2.8%,P=0.024)的红细胞压积水平也显著升高。两组患者的重症监护病房停留时间、机械通气时间和住院时间相似。术后射血分数值无显著差异(P=0.714)。

结论

与传统 BC 相比,dNCS 可显著缩短主动脉阻断时间,减少术中除颤的需要,降低术后 hsTnI 水平,且在成人主动脉手术中具有相似的早期临床结果。在成人主动脉心脏手术中,dNCS 是传统 BC 溶液的一种安全有效的替代方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验