Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
The North West Lung Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Eur Respir J. 2022 May 5;59(5). doi: 10.1183/13993003.02006-2021. Print 2022 May.
Clinical trials evaluating the management of acute exacerbations of COPD assess heterogeneous outcomes, often omitting those that are clinically relevant or more important to patients. We have developed a core outcome set, a consensus-based minimum set of important outcomes that we recommend are evaluated in all future clinical trials on exacerbations management, to improve their quality and comparability. COPD exacerbations outcomes were identified through methodological systematic reviews and qualitative interviews with 86 patients from 11 countries globally. The most critical outcomes were prioritised for inclusion in the core outcome set through a two-round Delphi survey completed by 1063 participants (256 patients, 488 health professionals and 319 clinical academics) from 88 countries in five continents. Two global, multi-stakeholder, virtual consensus meetings were conducted to 1) finalise the core outcome set and 2) prioritise a single measurement instrument to be used for evaluating each of the prioritised outcomes. Consensus was informed by rigorous methodological systematic reviews. The views of patients with COPD were accounted for at all stages of the project. Survival, treatment success, breathlessness, quality of life, activities of daily living, the need for a higher level of care, arterial blood gases, disease progression, future exacerbations and hospital admissions, treatment safety and adherence were all included in the core outcome set. Focused methodological research was recommended to further validate and optimise some of the selected measurement instruments. The panel did not consider the prioritised set of outcomes and associated measurement instruments to be burdensome for patients and health professionals to use.
我们开发了一个核心结局集,这是一个基于共识的最小重要结局集合,建议在未来所有关于急性加重期 COPD 管理的临床试验中评估这些结局,以提高其质量和可比性。通过对来自全球 11 个国家的 86 名患者进行方法学系统评价和定性访谈,确定了 COPD 急性加重的结局。通过两轮德尔菲调查,对来自全球 88 个国家的 1063 名参与者(256 名患者、488 名卫生专业人员和 319 名临床学者)进行了最关键的结局的优先级排序,以纳入核心结局集。进行了两次全球、多利益相关者、虚拟共识会议,以 1)最终确定核心结局集,2)为评估每个优先级结局的单一测量工具进行优先级排序。共识是基于严格的方法学系统评价。在项目的所有阶段都考虑了 COPD 患者的意见。生存率、治疗成功率、呼吸困难、生活质量、日常生活活动能力、需要更高水平的护理、动脉血气、疾病进展、未来加重和住院、治疗安全性和依从性都包含在核心结局集中。建议进行有针对性的方法学研究,以进一步验证和优化一些选定的测量工具。专家组认为,优先考虑的一系列结局及其相关的测量工具对患者和卫生专业人员来说并不难使用。