Suppr超能文献

一种新的数字化评估方案在牙龈退缩牙周整形手术的回顾性分析中的应用。

A new digital evaluation protocol applied in a retrospective analysis of periodontal plastic surgery of gingival recessions.

机构信息

Faculty of Dental Medicine, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Viseu, Portugal.

Faculty of Medicine, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 14;11(1):20399. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99573-6.

Abstract

This research aimed to develop a new digital evaluation protocol to objectively quantify the volumetric changes of root coverage periodontal plastic surgery when combined with connective tissue graft. Consecutive patients with Cairo recession type 1 (RT1) or Cairo recession type 2 (RT2) were treated. Accurate study models obtained at baseline and follow-ups were optically scanned. Healing dynamics were measured by calculating volume differences between time points. Nineteen patients were treated between December 2014 and January 2019. At 3-month follow-up, root coverage was 95.6% (± 14.5%) with tunnel and connective tissue graft (TUN + CTG) technique, and 88.9% (± 20.5%) with the vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access and connective tissue graft (VISTA + CTG) technique. Recession decreased 1.33 (± 0.86) mm and 1.42 (± 0.92) mm, respectively (p = 0.337). At 6-month follow-up, root coverage was 96.5% (± 10.4%) with the TUN + CTG and 93.9% (± 10.3%) with the VISTA + CTG. Recession decreased 1.35 (± 0.85) mm and 1.45 (± 0.82) mm, respectively (p = 0.455). Complete root coverage was achieved in 86.7% (± 0.4%) with TUN + CTG and 70.6% (± 0.5%) with VISTA + CTG. No statistically significant differences were found between techniques. The digital protocol presented proved to be a non-invasive technique for accurate measurements of clinical outcomes. Both techniques reduce gingival recessions, with no statistically significant differences.

摘要

本研究旨在开发一种新的数字评估方案,以客观量化结合结缔组织移植的牙周整形手术后的体积变化。连续患有开罗Ⅰ型(RT1)或开罗Ⅱ型(RT2)牙龈退缩的患者接受治疗。在基线和随访时获得准确的研究模型,并进行光学扫描。通过计算各时间点之间的体积差异来测量愈合动态。2014 年 12 月至 2019 年 1 月期间,共 19 名患者接受了治疗。在 3 个月的随访中,隧道和结缔组织移植(TUN+CTG)技术的根覆盖面积为 95.6%(±14.5%),而隧道和结缔组织移植(VISTA+CTG)技术的根覆盖面积为 88.9%(±20.5%)。退缩减少了 1.33(±0.86)mm 和 1.42(±0.92)mm,分别(p=0.337)。在 6 个月的随访中,TUN+CTG 的根覆盖面积为 96.5%(±10.4%),VISTA+CTG 的根覆盖面积为 93.9%(±10.3%)。退缩减少了 1.35(±0.85)mm 和 1.45(±0.82)mm,分别(p=0.455)。TUN+CTG 的完全根覆盖面积为 86.7%(±0.4%),VISTA+CTG 的完全根覆盖面积为 70.6%(±0.5%)。两种技术之间无统计学差异。所提出的数字方案被证明是一种非侵入性技术,可用于准确测量临床结果。两种技术均减少牙龈退缩,无统计学差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c8e/8516885/fd01e4a9ffd2/41598_2021_99573_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验