• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

研究口内扫描的光学 3D 精度:一项体外研究。

Studying the Optical 3D Accuracy of Intraoral Scans: An In Vitro Study.

机构信息

Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90110, Thailand.

出版信息

J Healthc Eng. 2020 Feb 14;2020:5739312. doi: 10.1155/2020/5739312. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1155/2020/5739312
PMID:32148745
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7042536/
Abstract

There are various scanners available in dental practice with various accuracies. The aim of this study was to compare the 3D capturing accuracy of scans obtained from Trios 3 and Dental Wings scanner. A reference mandibular model was printed from FormLab with reference points in three axes (, , and and ). The printed model was scanned 5 times with 3 scans: normal scan by Trios 3 (Trios 3A), high-resolution scan by Trios 3 (Trios 3B), and normal scan by Dental Wings. After scan, the stereolithography (stl) files were generated. Then, the measurements were made from the computer software using Rhinoceros 3D (Rhino, Robert McNeel & Associates for Windows, Washington DC, USA). The measurements made with digital caliper were taken as control. Statistical analysis was done using one-way ANOVA with post hoc using Sheffe ( < 0.01). Trios 3 presented higher accuracy than Dental Wings and high resolution showed better results. The Dental Wings showed less accuracy at the measurements >50 mm of length and >30 mm in width. There was no significant difference ( > 0.05) of control with the Trios 3A and Trios 3B. Similarly, for the measurements in -axis, there was no significant difference of control with each scan (Trios 3A, Trios 3B, and Dental Wings). Accuracy of the scan is affected by the length of the scanning area and scanning pattern. It is less recommended to Dental Wings scan >3-unit prosthesis and that crosses the midline.

摘要

在牙科实践中有各种具有不同精度的扫描仪。本研究的目的是比较 Trio 3 和 Dental Wings 扫描仪获取的 3D 扫描的准确性。使用 FormLab 从下颌模型打印出带有三个轴上的参考点( , ,和 )的模型。使用 3 种扫描仪对打印模型进行 5 次扫描:Trios 3 的常规扫描(Trios 3A),Trios 3 的高分辨率扫描(Trios 3B)和 Dental Wings 的常规扫描。扫描后,生成立体光刻(stl)文件。然后,使用 Rhinoceros 3D(Rhino,Robert McNeel&Associates for Windows,华盛顿特区,美国)从计算机软件中进行测量。用数字卡尺进行的测量作为对照。使用单向方差分析(ANOVA)进行统计分析,并使用 Sheffe 进行事后检验( < 0.01)。Trios 3 的准确性高于 Dental Wings,高分辨率的效果更好。 Dental Wings 在长度超过 50mm 和宽度超过 30mm 的测量中准确性较低。Trios 3A 和 Trios 3B 与对照之间无显著差异( > 0.05)。同样,在 -轴的测量中,每个扫描(Trios 3A,Trios 3B 和 Dental Wings)与对照之间也没有差异。扫描的准确性受扫描区域的长度和扫描模式的影响。不建议使用 Dental Wings 扫描超过 3 个单位的义齿,并且该义齿要跨过中线。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44d9/7042536/a2f7a0ad2289/JHE2020-5739312.006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44d9/7042536/57e8c0962bd0/JHE2020-5739312.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44d9/7042536/4b32d004f14c/JHE2020-5739312.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44d9/7042536/d82d96132b40/JHE2020-5739312.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44d9/7042536/858c671acdd7/JHE2020-5739312.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44d9/7042536/975c67799da8/JHE2020-5739312.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44d9/7042536/a2f7a0ad2289/JHE2020-5739312.006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44d9/7042536/57e8c0962bd0/JHE2020-5739312.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44d9/7042536/4b32d004f14c/JHE2020-5739312.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44d9/7042536/d82d96132b40/JHE2020-5739312.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44d9/7042536/858c671acdd7/JHE2020-5739312.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44d9/7042536/975c67799da8/JHE2020-5739312.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44d9/7042536/a2f7a0ad2289/JHE2020-5739312.006.jpg

相似文献

1
Studying the Optical 3D Accuracy of Intraoral Scans: An In Vitro Study.研究口内扫描的光学 3D 精度:一项体外研究。
J Healthc Eng. 2020 Feb 14;2020:5739312. doi: 10.1155/2020/5739312. eCollection 2020.
2
The Accuracy of Digital Face Scans Obtained from 3D Scanners: An In Vitro Study.数字面部扫描的准确性:来自 3D 扫描仪的体外研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 12;16(24):5061. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16245061.
3
Comparison of Accuracy of Current Ten Intraoral Scanners.当前十种口内扫描仪的准确性比较。
Biomed Res Int. 2021 Sep 13;2021:2673040. doi: 10.1155/2021/2673040. eCollection 2021.
4
Effect of Ambient Lights on the Accuracy of a 3-Dimensional Optical Scanner for Face Scans: An In Vitro Study.环境光对面部扫描三维光学扫描仪准确性的影响:一项体外研究。
J Healthc Eng. 2022 Aug 5;2022:2637078. doi: 10.1155/2022/2637078. eCollection 2022.
5
Evaluation of the accuracy of digital and 3D-printed casts compared with conventional stone casts.与传统石膏模型相比,对数字模型和3D打印模型的准确性进行评估。
J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Mar;127(3):438-444. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.08.039. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
6
Influence of operator experience, scanner type, and scan size on 3D scans.操作人员经验、扫描仪类型和扫描范围对 3D 扫描的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2021 Feb;125(2):294-299. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.12.011. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
7
Accuracy and efficiency of full-arch digitalization and 3D printing: A comparison between desktop model scanners, an intraoral scanner, a CBCT model scan, and stereolithographic 3D printing.全牙弓数字化与3D打印的准确性和效率:桌面模型扫描仪、口内扫描仪、CBCT模型扫描与立体光刻3D打印之间的比较
Quintessence Int. 2017;48(1):41-50. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a37130.
8
Finish line distinctness and accuracy in 7 intraoral scanners versus conventional impression: an in vitro descriptive comparison.7款口腔内扫描仪与传统印模的终点线清晰度和准确性:一项体外描述性比较
BMC Oral Health. 2018 Feb 23;18(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12903-018-0489-3.
9
Accuracy of CAD/CAM Digital Impressions with Different Intraoral Scanner Parameters.不同口内扫描仪参数的 CAD/CAM 数字化印模的准确性。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Feb 20;20(4):1157. doi: 10.3390/s20041157.
10
Complete-arch accuracy of intraoral scanners.口内扫描仪的全牙弓精度。
J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Sep;120(3):382-388. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.01.005. Epub 2018 Apr 30.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparative study based on the mandibular movement track and the movement parameters of the virtual articulator in simulating occlusal adjustment.基于下颌运动轨迹和虚拟𬌗架运动参数模拟咬合调整的对比研究。
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2023 Jun 1;41(3):254-259. doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2023.2022452.
2
Morphometric analysis of tooth morphology among different malocclusion groups in a hispanic population.不同错颌畸形组人群的牙形态测量分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Apr 3;23(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-02882-7.
3
A new digital evaluation protocol applied in a retrospective analysis of periodontal plastic surgery of gingival recessions.

本文引用的文献

1
The Accuracy of Digital Face Scans Obtained from 3D Scanners: An In Vitro Study.数字面部扫描的准确性:来自 3D 扫描仪的体外研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 12;16(24):5061. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16245061.
2
Trueness and Precision of Three-Dimensional Digitizing Intraoral Devices.三维数字化口腔内装置的准确性和精确性。
Int J Dent. 2018 Nov 26;2018:5189761. doi: 10.1155/2018/5189761. eCollection 2018.
3
Accuracy of Intraoral Scanners: A Systematic Review of Influencing Factors.口腔内扫描仪的准确性:影响因素的系统评价
一种新的数字化评估方案在牙龈退缩牙周整形手术的回顾性分析中的应用。
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 14;11(1):20399. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99573-6.
4
Comparison of Accuracy of Current Ten Intraoral Scanners.当前十种口内扫描仪的准确性比较。
Biomed Res Int. 2021 Sep 13;2021:2673040. doi: 10.1155/2021/2673040. eCollection 2021.
5
Comparison of the accuracy of intraoral digital impression system and conventional impression techniques for multiple implants in the full-arch edentulous mandible.全牙列无牙下颌骨多颗种植体的口内数字印模系统与传统印模技术准确性的比较。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2021 May 1;13(5):e487-e492. doi: 10.4317/jced.57926. eCollection 2021 May.
6
Three-dimensional analysis of the root canal preparation with Reciproc Blue®, WaveOne Gold® and XP EndoShaper®: a new method in vivo.Reciproc Blue®、WaveOne Gold® 和 XP EndoShaper® 根管预备的三维分析:一种新的体内方法。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Feb 25;21(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01450-1.
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2018 Aug 30;26(3):101-121. doi: 10.1922/EJPRD_01752Abduo21.
4
A comparison of the accuracy of intraoral scanners using an intraoral environment simulator.使用口腔内环境模拟器对口腔内扫描仪的准确性进行比较。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2018 Feb;10(1):58-64. doi: 10.4047/jap.2018.10.1.58. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
5
Intraoral scanners in dentistry: a review of the current literature.牙科中的口内扫描仪:当前文献综述
BMC Oral Health. 2017 Dec 12;17(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12903-017-0442-x.
6
Intraoral Scanner Technologies: A Review to Make a Successful Impression.口腔内扫描仪技术:制作成功印模的综述。
J Healthc Eng. 2017;2017:8427595. doi: 10.1155/2017/8427595. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
7
Comparison of digital intraoral scanners by single-image capture system and full-color movie system.通过单图像捕获系统和全彩动态影像系统对数字口腔内扫描仪进行比较。
Biomed Mater Eng. 2017;28(3):305-314. doi: 10.3233/BME-171676.
8
Evaluation of the accuracy of 7 digital scanners: An in vitro analysis based on 3-dimensional comparisons.评估 7 种数字扫描仪的准确性:基于三维比较的体外分析。
J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Jul;118(1):36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.09.024. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
9
Accuracy of impression scanning compared with stone casts of implant impressions.种植体印模扫描与石膏模型的准确性比较
J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Apr;117(4):507-512. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.07.026. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
10
Nepalese Esthetic Dental (NED) Proportion in Nepalese Population.尼泊尔人口中的尼泊尔美学牙科(NED)比例。
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2015 Jul-Sep;13(51):244-9. doi: 10.3126/kumj.v13i3.16816.