Voser Tanja M, Campbell Max D, Carroll Anthony R
School of Environment and Science, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.
Griffith Institute for Drug Discovery, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.
Nat Prod Rep. 2022 Jan 26;39(1):7-19. doi: 10.1039/d1np00051a.
Covering: 1877 to 2020A key challenge in natural products research is the selection of biodiversity to yield novel chemistry. Recently, marine microorganisms have become a preferred source. But how novel are marine microorganism natural products compared to those reported from terrestrial microbes? Cluster analysis of chemical fingerprints and molecular scaffold analysis of 55 817 compounds reported from marine and terrestrial microorganisms, and marine macro-organisms showed that 76.7% of the compounds isolated from marine microorganisms are closely related to compounds isolated from terrestrial microorganisms. Only 14.3% of marine microorganism natural products are unique when marine macro-organism natural products are also considered. Studies targeting marine specific and understudied microbial phyla result in a higher likelihood of finding marine specific compounds, whereas the depth and geographic location of microorganism collection have little influence. We recommend marine targeted strain isolation, incorporating early use of genomic sequencing to guide strain selection, innovation in culture media and cultivation techniques and the application of cheminformatics tools to focus on unique natural product diversity, rather than the dereplication of known compounds.
1877年至2020年
天然产物研究中的一个关键挑战是选择能产生新化学物质的生物多样性。最近,海洋微生物已成为首选来源。但是,与陆地微生物报道的天然产物相比,海洋微生物天然产物有多新颖呢?对海洋和陆地微生物以及海洋大型生物报道的55817种化合物进行化学指纹聚类分析和分子支架分析表明,从海洋微生物中分离出的化合物有76.7%与从陆地微生物中分离出的化合物密切相关。如果也考虑海洋大型生物天然产物,那么只有14.3%的海洋微生物天然产物是独特的。针对海洋特定且研究不足的微生物门类进行研究,发现海洋特定化合物的可能性更高,而微生物采集的深度和地理位置影响较小。我们建议进行海洋靶向菌株分离,包括早期使用基因组测序来指导菌株选择、创新培养基和培养技术以及应用化学信息学工具来关注独特的天然产物多样性,而不是对已知化合物进行重复排除。