PRECISIONheor, Los Angeles, CA.
Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Titusville, NJ.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Oct;27(10-a Suppl):S2-S13. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.10-aa.s2.
Despite therapeutic advances for patients with schizophrenia, improving patient outcomes and reducing the cost of care continue to challenge formulary decision makers. To (1) understand the perspectives of formulary decision makers on challenges to optimal schizophrenia population management and (2) identify best practices and recommendations for mitigating these challenges. This mixed-methods study, conducted in a double-blind manner, comprised in-depth telephone interviews with formulary decision makers from February through May 2020, and a web-based follow-on survey that was sent to all participants in October 2020. US-based formulary decision makers were recruited if they were directly involved in schizophrenia drug formulary or coverage decision making for national or regional payers, health systems, or behavioral health centers. Formulary decision makers' perceptions of challenges, policies, and programs related to schizophrenia population health management were assessed generally and in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. 19 formulary decision makers participated in the interviews and 18 (95%) completed the survey. Participants reported a spectrum of patient- and payer-driven challenges in schizophrenia population health management, including medication nonadherence, high pharmacy and medical costs, and frequent hospitalizations and emergency department visits. Participants noted that COVID-19 had worsened all identified challenges, although patient unemployment (mean score of 2.00 on a scale of 1 [made much worse] to 5 [made much better]) and reduced access to psychiatric care (mean score, 2.12) were most negatively affected. The most common strategies implemented in order to improve schizophrenia population health management included case management (89%), telemedicine (83%), care coordination programs (72%), strategies to mitigate barriers to accessing medication (61%), and providing nonmedical services to address social determinants of health (56%). Participants noted that, ideally, all treatments for schizophrenia would be available on their formularies without utilization management policies in place in order to increase accessibility to medication, but cost to the health plans made that difficult. Whereas 61% of respondents believed that long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) were currently underused in their organizations, only 28% represented organizations with open access policies for LAIs. Participants believed that among patients with schizophrenia, LAIs were most beneficial for those with a history of poor or uncertain adherence to oral medications (mean score of 4.50 on a scale of 1 [not at all beneficial] to 5 [extremely beneficial]) and those with recurring emergency department visits and inpatient stays (mean score, 3.94). Study participants reported slightly increased use of LAIs (mean score of 3.17 on a scale of 1 [negatively impacted] to 5 [positively impacted]) among their patients with schizophrenia in response to the COVID-19 pandemic; 29% of participants reported easing access restrictions for LAIs. Participants described persisting challenges and various approaches intended to improve schizophrenia population health management. They also recommended strategies to optimize future health management for this population, including expanding programs to address social determinants of health and mitigating barriers to accessing treatment. This study was funded by Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC. Roach, Graf, Pednekar, and Chou are employees of PRECISIONheor, which received financial support from Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, to conduct this study. Chou owns equity in Precision Medicine Group, the parent company of PRECISIONheor. Lin and Benson are employees of Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC. Doshi has served as a consultant, advisory board member, or both, for Acadia, Allergan, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Merck, Otsuka, and Sage Therapeutics and has received research funding from AbbVie, Biogen, Humana, Janssen, Novartis, Merck, Pfizer, PhRMA, Regeneron, Sanofi, and Valeant.
尽管针对精神分裂症患者的治疗方法有所进步,但改善患者的预后和降低医疗成本仍然是处方决策者面临的挑战。本研究旨在:(1) 了解处方决策者在优化精神分裂症人群管理方面面临的挑战的观点;(2) 确定缓解这些挑战的最佳实践和建议。这是一项混合方法研究,采用双盲方式,于 2020 年 2 月至 5 月对来自全国或地区支付者、卫生系统或行为健康中心的精神分裂症药物处方或覆盖决策的处方决策者进行深入的电话访谈,并于 2020 年 10 月向所有参与者发送了在线后续调查。如果处方决策者直接参与了国家或地区的精神分裂症药物处方或覆盖决策,就有资格参与研究。评估了处方决策者对与精神分裂症人群健康管理相关的政策和项目的看法,包括一般看法和在 COVID-19 大流行背景下的看法。19 名处方决策者参加了访谈,18 名(95%)完成了调查。参与者报告了一系列患者和支付者驱动的精神分裂症人群健康管理挑战,包括药物不依从、高药房和医疗成本以及频繁住院和急诊就诊。参与者指出,COVID-19 加剧了所有已确定的挑战,尽管患者失业(评分均值为 1 分制中的 2.00 分,从“变得更糟”到 5 分“变得更好”)和获得精神科护理的机会减少(评分均值为 2.12 分)受到的影响最大。为改善精神分裂症人群健康管理而实施的最常见策略包括病例管理(89%)、远程医疗(83%)、护理协调计划(72%)、减轻获取药物障碍的策略(61%)和提供非医疗服务以解决健康决定因素(56%)。参与者指出,理想情况下,他们的处方中应提供所有治疗精神分裂症的药物,而无需实施使用管理政策,以增加药物的可及性,但这对健康计划的成本造成了困难。虽然 61%的受访者认为长效注射抗精神病药物(LAls)在他们的机构中使用不足,但只有 28%的受访者所在机构对 LAls 有开放获取政策。参与者认为,在精神分裂症患者中,LAls 对那些口服药物依从性差或不确定的患者(评分均值为 4.50 分制中的 1 分“没有益处”至 5 分“非常有益”)和那些经常急诊就诊和住院的患者最有益(评分均值为 3.94 分)。研究参与者报告称,在 COVID-19 大流行期间,他们的精神分裂症患者中 LAls 的使用略有增加(评分均值为 3.17 分制中的 1 分“负面影响”至 5 分“积极影响”);29%的参与者报告称放宽了 LAls 的获取限制。参与者描述了持续存在的挑战和各种旨在改善精神分裂症人群健康管理的方法。他们还建议了优化该人群未来健康管理的策略,包括扩大解决健康决定因素的计划和减轻获取治疗的障碍。本研究由杨森科学事务有限责任公司资助。Roach、Graf、Pednekar 和 Chou 是 PRECISIONheor 的员工,该公司从杨森科学事务有限责任公司获得资金支持开展了这项研究。Chou 拥有 Precision Medicine Group 的股权,该公司是 PRECISIONheor 的母公司。Lin 和 Benson 是杨森科学事务有限责任公司的员工。Doshi 曾担任 Acadia、Allergan、Boehringer Ingelheim、Janssen、Merck、Otsuka 和 Sage Therapeutics 的顾问、顾问委员会成员或兼而有之,并从 AbbVie、Biogen、Humana、Janssen、Novartis、Merck、Pfizer、PhRMA、Regeneron、Sanofi 和 Valeant 获得了研究资金。