• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Sustained long-term benefits of patient support program participation in immune-mediated diseases: improved medication-taking behavior and lower risk of a hospital visit.患者支持计划参与对免疫介导性疾病的长期持续获益:改善用药行为,降低住院风险。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Aug;27(8):1086-1095. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.20560. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
2
Patient Support Program Increased Medication Adherence with Lower Total Health Care Costs Despite Increased Drug Spending.患者支持计划提高了药物依从性,降低了总体医疗保健成本,尽管药物支出增加了。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Jul;25(7):770-779. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.18443. Epub 2019 May 11.
3
Impact of a Patient Support Program on Patient Adherence to Adalimumab and Direct Medical Costs in Crohn's Disease, Ulcerative Colitis, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriasis, Psoriatic Arthritis, and Ankylosing Spondylitis.患者支持计划对克罗恩病、溃疡性结肠炎、类风湿性关节炎、银屑病、银屑病关节炎和强直性脊柱炎患者阿达木单抗依从性和直接医疗费用的影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Aug;23(8):859-867. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.16272. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
4
CME/CNE Article: A Framework of Care in Multiple Sclerosis, Part 1: Updated Disease Classification and Disease-Modifying Therapy Use in Specific Circumstances.继续医学教育/继续护理学教育文章:多发性硬化症的护理框架,第1部分:更新的疾病分类及特定情况下疾病修正治疗的应用
Int J MS Care. 2016 Nov-Dec;18(6):314-323. doi: 10.7224/1537-2073.2016-051.
5
Health-related quality of life in GALAHAD: A multicenter, open-label, phase 2 study of niraparib for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and DNA-repair gene defects.GALAHAD 研究中的健康相关生活质量:尼拉帕利治疗伴有 DNA 修复基因缺陷的转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌患者的多中心、开放标签、2 期研究。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2023 Jul;29(7):758-768. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2023.29.7.758.
6
LBA02-09 EMBARK: A Phase 3 Randomized Study of Enzalutamide or Placebo Plus Leuprolide Acetate and Enzalutamide Monotherapy in High-risk Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer.LBA02-09:EMBARK 研究:恩扎卢胺或安慰剂联合醋酸亮丙瑞林与恩扎卢胺单药治疗高危生化复发前列腺癌的 3 期随机研究。
J Urol. 2023 Jul;210(1):224-226. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003518. Epub 2023 May 2.
7
Annual costs among patients with major depressive disorder and the impact of key clinical events.重度抑郁症患者的年度成本及其主要临床事件的影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022 Dec;28(12):1335-1343. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.12.1335.
8
Ketamine: stimulating antidepressant treatment?氯胺酮:一种刺激性抗抑郁治疗方法?
BJPsych Open. 2016 May 11;2(3):e5-e9. doi: 10.1192/bjpo.bp.116.002923. eCollection 2016 May.
9
Comparison of Health Care Costs Among Patients with Psoriasis Initiating Ixekizumab, Secukinumab, or Adalimumab.比较起始使用依奇珠单抗、司库奇尤单抗或阿达木单抗治疗银屑病患者的医疗费用。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Dec;25(12):1366-1376. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.12.1366.
10
Real-world persistence and costs among patients with chronic migraine treated with onabotulinumtoxinA or calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies.慢性偏头痛患者接受肉毒毒素 A 或降钙素基因相关肽单克隆抗体治疗的真实世界持久性和成本。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2023 Oct;29(10):1119-1128. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2023.29.10.1119.

引用本文的文献

1
Getting to specialty treatment in dermatologic inflammatory conditions: Treatment requirements and patient journey.通往皮肤科炎症性疾病专科治疗之路:治疗需求与患者就医过程
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2025 Feb 1;31(2):147-156. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.2.147.
2
An Access-Focused Patient-Centric Value Assessment Framework for Medication Formulary Decision-Making in Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases.一种以免疫介导炎症性疾病药物处方集决策为重点的以患者为中心的价值评估框架。
Adv Ther. 2025 Feb;42(2):568-578. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-03076-5. Epub 2024 Dec 20.
3
Impact of a Patient Support Program on time to discontinuation of adalimumab in Australian adult patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases-an observational study.一项患者支持项目对澳大利亚成年免疫介导性炎症疾病患者停用阿达木单抗时间的影响——一项观察性研究
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 13;19(6):e0300624. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300624. eCollection 2024.
4
Impact of patient support programmes among patients with severe asthma treated with biological therapies: a systematic literature review and indirect treatment comparison.生物疗法治疗重度哮喘患者的患者支持计划的影响:系统文献回顾和间接治疗比较。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2024 May 2;11(1):e001799. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2023-001799.
5
Characteristics and outcomes of patients enrolled in the Connect 360 benralizumab patient support programme in the UK: a retrospective cohort study.在英国参加 Connect 360 贝那鲁肽患者支持计划的患者的特征和结局:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2024 Jan 23;11(1):e001734. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2023-001734.
6
Expanding the Catalog of Patient and Caregiver Out-of-Pocket Costs: A Systematic Literature Review.扩大患者和照护者自付费用目录:系统文献回顾。
Popul Health Manag. 2024 Feb;27(1):70-83. doi: 10.1089/pop.2023.0238. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
7
The association between cost sharing, prior authorization, and specialty drug utilization: A systematic review.费用分担、事先授权与专科药物使用之间的关联:系统评价。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2023 May;29(5):449-463. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2023.29.5.449.
8
Continuity of Care Within a Single Patient Support Program for Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Prescribed Second or Later Line Advanced Therapy.类风湿关节炎患者二线及以上高级治疗药物处方的单一患者支持项目内的连续性护理。
Adv Ther. 2023 Mar;40(3):990-1004. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02413-w. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
9
Digital Transformation in Medical Affairs Sparked by the Pandemic: Insights and Learnings from COVID-19 Era and Beyond.疫情推动医疗事务数字化转型:COVID-19 时代及以后的洞察与经验。
Pharmaceut Med. 2022 Feb;36(1):1-10. doi: 10.1007/s40290-021-00412-w. Epub 2021 Dec 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Educating Patients by Providing Timely Information Using Smartphone and Tablet Apps: Systematic Review.通过使用智能手机和平板电脑应用程序提供及时信息来教育患者:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Apr 13;22(4):e17342. doi: 10.2196/17342.
2
National Health Expenditure Projections, 2019-28: Expected Rebound In Prices Drives Rising Spending Growth.《2019 - 2028年国家卫生支出预测:价格预期反弹推动支出增长上升》
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Apr;39(4):704-714. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00094. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
3
What impact do chronic disease self-management support interventions have on health inequity gaps related to socioeconomic status: a systematic review.慢性病自我管理支持干预对与社会经济地位相关的健康不平等差距有何影响:系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Feb 27;20(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-5010-4.
4
Waste in the US Health Care System: Estimated Costs and Potential for Savings.美国医疗体系中的浪费:估计成本和节约潜力。
JAMA. 2019 Oct 15;322(15):1501-1509. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.13978.
5
Participation in an innovative patient support program reduces prescription abandonment for adalimumab-treated patients in a commercial population.参与一项创新的患者支持计划可减少商业人群中接受阿达木单抗治疗患者的处方弃用情况。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2019 Sep 13;13:1545-1556. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S215037. eCollection 2019.
6
Helping patients help themselves: A systematic review of self-management support strategies in primary health care practice.帮助患者自助:初级卫生保健实践中自我管理支持策略的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 1;14(8):e0220116. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220116. eCollection 2019.
7
Impact of Online Prescription Management Systems on Biologic Treatment Initiation.在线处方管理系统对生物制剂治疗起始的影响。
Adv Ther. 2019 Aug;36(8):2021-2033. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-01000-w. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
8
The Cost of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: An Initiative From the Crohn's & Colitis Foundation.炎症性肠病的成本:来自克罗恩病和结肠炎基金会的倡议。
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2020 Jan 1;26(1):1-10. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izz104.
9
Patient Support Program Increased Medication Adherence with Lower Total Health Care Costs Despite Increased Drug Spending.患者支持计划提高了药物依从性,降低了总体医疗保健成本,尽管药物支出增加了。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Jul;25(7):770-779. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.18443. Epub 2019 May 11.
10
Hospital Prices Grew Substantially Faster Than Physician Prices For Hospital-Based Care In 2007-14.2007-14 年,医院为基础的护理中,医院价格的增长速度大大快于医生价格的增长速度。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Feb;38(2):184-189. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05424.

患者支持计划参与对免疫介导性疾病的长期持续获益:改善用药行为,降低住院风险。

Sustained long-term benefits of patient support program participation in immune-mediated diseases: improved medication-taking behavior and lower risk of a hospital visit.

机构信息

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

University of Utah College of Pharmacy, Salt Lake City.

出版信息

J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Aug;27(8):1086-1095. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.20560. Epub 2021 Apr 12.

DOI:10.18553/jmcp.2021.20560
PMID:33843252
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10394214/
Abstract

Patient support programs (PSPs) improve medication-taking behavior in the first 12 months of treatment for patients with immune-mediated diseases, but it is unknown if these benefits are sustained. As immune-mediated diseases continue to increase in prevalence and economic burden, understanding the potential value of PSPs in helping patients adhere to their long-term treatment plan and avoid costly hospital visits is crucial. Launched nationally in 2015, HUMIRA Complete (a PSP for adalimumab patients) provides an opportunity to study long-term effects of PSP participation, including the impact on medication-taking behavior and hospital visits. To evaluate the sustained relationship between PSP participation, long-term medication-taking behavior, and hospital visits. A longitudinal, retrospective matched-cohort study was conducted of patients initiating adalimumab between January 2015 and February 2016 with or without enrolling in the PSP, using patient-level data from the HUMIRA Complete PSP linked with Symphony Health claims. The sample included adult, commercially insured patients diagnosed with an indicated disease who were biologic-naive and had data available for ≥ 6 months before and ≥ 12 months after initiating adalimumab. Adherence (proportion of days covered) and hospital visits were assessed at 12, 24, and 36 months for patients with sufficient follow-up data. Multivariable generalized models estimated differences between cohorts, controlling for baseline characteristics and hospital visits. Duration of persistence and time to a hospital visit were compared using Kaplan-Meier analyses. Hazard ratios were estimated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. The matched cohort included 2,268 patients (1,134 per cohort), and patient attrition was similar across cohorts. The PSP cohort consistently demonstrated higher adalimumab adherence than the non-PSP cohort at 12 (64.8% vs. 50.1%, < 0.0001; 29% greater), 24 (49.4% vs. 38.4%; < 0.0001; 29% greater), and 36 (39.4% vs. 35.1%; = 0.02; 12% greater) months. PSP participation was associated with a 30% lower hazard of discontinuation ( < 0.0001), and median duration of persistence was 4.8 months longer for the PSP cohort (13.2 vs. 8.4 months; < 0.0001). The PSP cohort had lower rates of hospital visits at 12 (30% vs. 37%; < 0.001; 19% lower), 24 (44% vs. 53%; = 0.01; 17% lower), and 36 (55% vs. 65%; < 0.01; 16% lower) months, and PSP participation was associated with a 25% lower hazard of a hospital visit ( < 0.0001). Median time to a hospital visit was 10.8 months longer for the PSP cohort (32.7 vs. 21.9 months; < 0.0001). Findings were consistent across therapeutic areas: hazard of a hospital visit was 28%, 27%, and 37% lower for rheumatology, gastroenterology, and dermatology patients participating in the PSP (all < 0.05). Patients with immune-mediated diseases receiving adalimumab and utilizing this PSP had improved long-term medication-taking behavior and lower risk of hospital visits, demonstrating the potential of PSPs to improve patient outcomes and lower the burden to the health care system. Design, study conduct, and financial support for the study were provided by AbbVie Inc., which participated in the interpretation of data, review, and approval of the manuscript. Fendrick has received personal fees from Merck, AstraZeneca, Trizetto, Amgen, Lilly, AbbVie, Johnson & Johnson, and Sanofi; grants from the National Pharmaceutical Council, PhRMA, the Gary and Mary West Health Foundation, the states of New York and Michigan, the Laura and John Arnold Foundation, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; and equity in Zansors, Sempre Health, Wellth, and V-BID Health. Brixner has received consulting fees from AbbVie, Novartis, Xcenda, Elevar Therapeutics, Sanofi, UCB Pharma, and the Millcreek Outcomes Group. Rubin has received consulting fees from AbbVie, Abgenomics, Allergan Inc., Amgen, Celgene Corporation, Forward Pharma, Genentech/Roche, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Merck & Co., Miraca Life Sciences, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Development America, Napo Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, Salix Pharmaceuticals Inc., Samsung Bioepis, Sandoz Pharmaceuticals, Shire, Takeda, and Target Pharmaceuticals; and research support from AbbVie, Genentech/Roche, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Prometheus Laboratories, Shire, Takeda, and UCB Pharma. Mease has received grant/research support from AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, SUN Pharma, and UCB; consulting fees from AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Galapagos, Genentech, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, SUN Pharma, and UCB; and has served on the speakers bureau for AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB. Liu has no financial conflict of interest. Davis is an employee of Medicus Economics, which received payment from AbbVie to participate in this research. Mittal is an employee and stockholder of AbbVie. This study used a cohort of patients previously described in Brixner D, Rubin DT, Mease P, et al. Patient support program increased medication adherence with lower total health care costs despite increased drug spending. 2019 Jul;25(7):770-79 (doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.18443). As such, the sample selection and select baseline characteristics and 12-month outcomes have been published previously; however, the hospital visit outcomes and the longer-term medication-taking behavior outcomes have not been previously published or presented.

摘要

患者支持计划(PSP)可改善免疫介导性疾病患者在治疗的头 12 个月内的服药行为,但尚不清楚这些益处是否可持续。随着免疫介导性疾病的患病率和经济负担不断增加,了解 PSP 帮助患者坚持长期治疗计划和避免昂贵的医院就诊的潜在价值至关重要。2015 年在全国推出的 HUMIRA Complete(阿达木单抗患者的 PSP)为研究 PSP 参与的长期影响提供了机会,包括对服药行为和医院就诊的影响。

评估 PSP 参与、长期服药行为和医院就诊之间的持续关系。采用患者层面的数据,对 2015 年 1 月至 2016 年 2 月期间接受阿达木单抗治疗的患者进行了一项全国性、回顾性、匹配队列研究,无论是否参加 PSP,均使用了 Humira Complete PSP 链接的 Symphony Health 索赔数据。该样本包括被诊断为有指征疾病的成年商业保险患者,这些患者在开始使用阿达木单抗前至少有 6 个月的数据,并且在开始使用阿达木单抗后至少有 12 个月的数据。对于有足够随访数据的患者,在 12、24 和 36 个月时评估了依从性(覆盖天数比例)和医院就诊情况。使用 Kaplan-Meier 分析比较了队列之间的差异,控制了基线特征和医院就诊情况。使用多变量 Cox 比例风险模型比较了持续时间和到医院就诊的时间。

匹配队列包括 2268 名患者(每组 1134 名),各队列的患者流失情况相似。PSP 队列在 12 个月(64.8% vs. 50.1%,<0.0001;29%更高)、24 个月(49.4% vs. 38.4%;<0.0001;29%更高)和 36 个月(39.4% vs. 35.1%;=0.02;12%更高)时的阿达木单抗依从性始终高于非 PSP 队列。PSP 参与与停药的风险降低 30%相关(<0.0001),PSP 队列的持续时间中位数长 4.8 个月(13.2 个月 vs. 8.4 个月;<0.0001)。PSP 队列在 12 个月(30% vs. 37%;<0.001;19%更低)、24 个月(44% vs. 53%;=0.01;17%更低)和 36 个月(55% vs. 65%;<0.01;16%更低)时的医院就诊率较低,PSP 参与与医院就诊的风险降低 25%相关(<0.0001)。PSP 队列的首次就诊时间中位数长 10.8 个月(32.7 个月 vs. 21.9 个月;<0.0001)。在治疗领域中均发现了相似的结果:参与 PSP 的风湿科、胃肠病科和皮肤科患者的就诊风险降低了 28%、27%和 37%(均<0.05)。

接受阿达木单抗治疗并使用该 PSP 的免疫介导性疾病患者改善了长期服药行为,降低了医院就诊的风险,表明 PSP 有可能改善患者的预后并降低医疗保健系统的负担。AbbVie Inc. 提供了研究的设计、研究的进行和研究的资金支持,该公司参与了数据的解释、审查和手稿的批准。芬德雷克拥有 Merck、AstraZeneca、Trizetto、Amgen、Lilly、AbbVie、Johnson & Johnson 和 Sanofi 的个人酬金;从国家制药理事会、PhRMA、加里和玛丽·韦斯特健康基金会、纽约州和密歇根州、劳拉和约翰·阿诺德基金会、罗伯特·伍德·约翰逊基金会和医疗保健研究和质量署获得赠款;并在 Zansors、Sempre Health、Wellth 和 V-BID Health 中拥有股权。布里克斯纳从 AbbVie、Novartis、Xcenda、Elevar Therapeutics、Sanofi、UCB Pharma 和 Millcreek Outcomes Group 获得咨询费。鲁宾从 AbbVie、Abgenomics、Allergan Inc.、Amgen、Celgene Corporation、Forward Pharma、Genentech/Roche、Janssen Pharmaceuticals、Merck & Co.、Miraca Life Sciences、 Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Development America、Napo Pharmaceuticals、Pfizer、Salix Pharmaceuticals Inc.、Samsung Bioepis、Sandoz Pharmaceuticals、Shire、Takeda 和 Target Pharmaceuticals 获得咨询费;并从 AbbVie、Genentech/Roche、Janssen Pharmaceuticals、Prometheus Laboratories、Shire、Takeda 和 UCB Pharma 获得研究支持。米泽斯从 AbbVie、Amgen、BMS、Celgene、Janssen、Lilly、Merck、Novartis、Pfizer、SUN Pharma 和 UCB 获得研究资金/研究支持;从 AbbVie、Amgen、BMS、Boehringer Ingelheim、Celgene、Galapagos、Genentech、Gilead、GlaxoSmithKline、Janssen、Lilly、Novartis、Pfizer、SUN Pharma 和 UCB 获得咨询费;并在 AbbVie、Amgen、Celgene、Janssen、Lilly、Novartis、Pfizer 和 UCB 担任演讲者。刘没有财务利益冲突。戴维斯是 Medicus Economics 的员工,该公司从 AbbVie 获得报酬参与这项研究。米塔尔是 AbbVie 的员工和股东。这项研究使用了以前在 Brixner D、Rubin DT、Mease P 等人的研究中描述过的患者队列。患者支持计划增加了药物治疗的依从性,尽管药物支出增加,但总体医疗成本降低。2019 年 7 月;25(7):770-79(doi:10.18553/jmcp.2019.18443)。因此,样本选择和一些基线特征和 12 个月的结果以前已经发表过;然而,医院就诊结果和长期服药行为结果以前没有发表过或呈现过。