• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

促进生活方式支持和电子健康解决方案的因素及障碍:在心脏护理领域工作的医疗保健专业人员的访谈研究。

Facilitators of and Barriers to Lifestyle Support and eHealth Solutions: Interview Study Among Health Care Professionals Working in Cardiac Care.

机构信息

Health, Medical, and Neuropsychology Unit, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands.

Department of Human-Centered Design, Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Technical University of Delft, Delft, Netherlands.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 15;23(10):e25646. doi: 10.2196/25646.

DOI:10.2196/25646
PMID:34652280
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8556639/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) pose a significant health threat and reduce both people's life expectancy and quality of life. Healthy living is a key component in the effective prevention and treatment of CVD. However, health care professionals (HCPs) experience difficulties in supporting lifestyle changes among their patients. eHealth can provide a solution to these barriers.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to provide insights into the factors HCPs find important in the support of patients with CVD in the uptake of and adherence to a healthy lifestyle and the perceived facilitators of and barriers to using eHealth to provide lifestyle support to patients with CVD.

METHODS

In-depth interviews were conducted with 16 Dutch HCPs specializing in lifestyle support in cardiac care.

RESULTS

We identified 13 themes, of which the first 12 concerned lifestyle support in general and were related to intervention, patient, or health care. Throughout these themes, the use of eHealth reoccurred as a potential facilitator of or solution to barriers to lifestyle support. Our final theme specifically concerned barriers to the adoption and usability of eHealth.

CONCLUSIONS

HCPs do recognize the potential advantages of eHealth while experiencing barriers to using digital tools. Incorporating their needs and values in the development of lifestyle support programs, especially eHealth, could increase their use and lead to a more widespread adoption of eHealth into health care.

摘要

背景

心血管疾病(CVDs)对健康构成重大威胁,降低了人们的预期寿命和生活质量。健康生活是 CVD 有效预防和治疗的关键组成部分。然而,医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)在支持患者改变生活方式方面遇到了困难。电子健康(eHealth)可以为这些障碍提供解决方案。

目的

本研究旨在深入了解 HCPs 在支持 CVD 患者采用和坚持健康生活方式方面认为重要的因素,以及他们认为使用电子健康(eHealth)为 CVD 患者提供生活方式支持的促进因素和障碍。

方法

对 16 名专门从事心脏护理生活方式支持的荷兰 HCPs 进行了深入访谈。

结果

我们确定了 13 个主题,其中前 12 个主题与一般的生活方式支持有关,与干预、患者或医疗保健有关。在这些主题中,eHealth 的使用反复出现,作为生活方式支持的促进因素或障碍的解决方案。我们的最后一个主题专门涉及电子健康的采用和可用性障碍。

结论

HCPs 确实认识到 eHealth 的潜在优势,但同时也面临使用数字工具的障碍。在开发生活方式支持计划,特别是电子健康时,纳入他们的需求和价值观,可以增加其使用,并导致更广泛地将电子健康应用于医疗保健。

相似文献

1
Facilitators of and Barriers to Lifestyle Support and eHealth Solutions: Interview Study Among Health Care Professionals Working in Cardiac Care.促进生活方式支持和电子健康解决方案的因素及障碍:在心脏护理领域工作的医疗保健专业人员的访谈研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 15;23(10):e25646. doi: 10.2196/25646.
2
Determinants of Successful eHealth Coaching for Consumer Lifestyle Changes: Qualitative Interview Study Among Health Care Professionals.消费者生活方式改变的成功电子健康指导的决定因素:医疗保健专业人员的定性访谈研究
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jul 5;20(7):e237. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9791.
3
Digital tools/eHealth to support CKD self-management: A qualitative study of perceptions, attitudes and needs of patients and health care professionals in China.数字工具/电子健康支持慢性肾脏病自我管理:对中国患者和医疗保健专业人员的认知、态度和需求的定性研究。
Int J Med Inform. 2022 Sep;165:104811. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104811. Epub 2022 Jun 10.
4
The Barriers and Facilitators of eHealth-Based Lifestyle Intervention Programs for People With a Low Socioeconomic Status: Scoping Review.社会经济地位较低人群基于电子健康的生活方式干预项目的障碍与促进因素:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Aug 24;24(8):e34229. doi: 10.2196/34229.
5
Perspectives of Policy Makers and Service Users Concerning the Implementation of eHealth in Sweden: Interview Study.政策制定者和服务使用者对瑞典电子健康实施的看法:访谈研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 28;24(1):e28870. doi: 10.2196/28870.
6
Financial Incentives for Healthy Living for Patients With Cardiac Disease From the Perspective of Health Care Professionals: Interview Study.从医疗保健专业人员视角看针对心脏病患者健康生活的经济激励措施:访谈研究
JMIR Cardio. 2021 Aug 30;5(2):e27867. doi: 10.2196/27867.
7
eHealth Technologies, Multimorbidity, and the Office Visit: Qualitative Interview Study on the Perspectives of Physicians and Nurses.电子健康技术、多重疾病与门诊诊疗:关于医生和护士观点的定性访谈研究
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jan 26;20(1):e31. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8983.
8
Health Care Professionals' Experiences and Views of eHealth in Pediatric Care: Qualitative Interview Study Applying a Theoretical Framework for Implementation.医疗保健专业人员在儿科护理中对电子健康的体验与看法:运用实施理论框架的定性访谈研究
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2023 Oct 18;6:e47663. doi: 10.2196/47663.
9
A multi-stakeholder approach to eHealth development: Promoting sustained healthy living among cardiovascular patients.多利益相关者方法促进电子健康发展:促进心血管病患者的持续健康生活。
Int J Med Inform. 2021 Mar;147:104364. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104364. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
10
An eHealth Application in Head and Neck Cancer Survivorship Care: Health Care Professionals' Perspectives.头颈癌幸存者护理中的电子健康应用:医疗保健专业人员的观点。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Oct 21;17(10):e235. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4870.

引用本文的文献

1
Adherence to eHealth Interventions Among Patients With Heart Failure: Scoping Review.心力衰竭患者对电子健康干预措施的依从性:范围综述
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025 Jun 27;13:e63409. doi: 10.2196/63409.
2
Health Care Professionals' Use of Digital Technology in the Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Austria: Online Survey Study.奥地利医疗保健专业人员在心血管疾病二级预防中对数字技术的使用:在线调查研究
JMIR Cardio. 2025 Jun 25;9:e71366. doi: 10.2196/71366.
3
Beyond motivation: Creating supportive healthcare environments for engaging in therapeutic patient education according to healthcare providers.

本文引用的文献

1
Health System Stakeholders' Perspective on the Role of Mobile Health and Its Adoption in the Swiss Health System: Qualitative Study.卫生系统利益相关者对移动医疗的作用及其在瑞士卫生系统中应用的看法:定性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 May 11;8(5):e17315. doi: 10.2196/17315.
2
Toward Integration of mHealth in Primary Care in the Netherlands: A Qualitative Analysis of Stakeholder Perspectives.荷兰移动健康融入初级医疗保健的研究:利益相关者观点的定性分析
Front Public Health. 2020 Jan 15;7:407. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00407. eCollection 2019.
3
Lifestyle and impact on cardiovascular risk factor control in coronary patients across 27 countries: Results from the European Society of Cardiology ESC-EORP EUROASPIRE V registry.
超越动机:根据医疗服务提供者的要求,营造支持性的医疗环境以开展治疗性患者教育。
PEC Innov. 2025 May 25;6:100405. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2025.100405. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
Design Requirements for Cardiac Telerehabilitation Technologies Supporting Athlete Values: Qualitative Interview Study.支持运动员价值观的心脏远程康复技术的设计要求:定性访谈研究
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2025 Apr 17;12:e62986. doi: 10.2196/62986.
5
Health Care Professionals' Perspectives on Using eHealth Tools in Advanced Home Care: Qualitative Interview Study.医疗保健专业人员对在高级家庭护理中使用电子健康工具的看法:定性访谈研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Mar 24;12:e60582. doi: 10.2196/60582.
6
How the Plants for Joints multidisciplinary lifestyle intervention achieved its effects: a mixed methods process evaluation.关节植物多学科生活方式干预如何产生效果:混合方法过程评估。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Apr 13;24(1):1034. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18554-2.
7
Patient-reported preferences in eHealth-based cardiac rehabilitation: A qualitative investigation of behavior change techniques, barriers and facilitators.基于电子健康的心脏康复中患者报告的偏好:行为改变技术、障碍和促进因素的定性研究。
Internet Interv. 2024 Feb 16;35:100728. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2024.100728. eCollection 2024 Mar.
8
A web-based intervention for patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator - A qualitative study of nurses' experiences (Data from the ACQUIRE-ICD study).一项针对植入式心脏复律除颤器患者的基于网络的干预措施——护士经验的定性研究(来自ACQUIRE-ICD研究的数据)
PEC Innov. 2022 Nov 28;2:100110. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100110. eCollection 2023 Dec.
9
Lifestyle support preferences of patients with cardiovascular diseases: What lifestyle support might work best for whom?心血管疾病患者的生活方式支持偏好:哪种生活方式支持可能对谁最有效?
PEC Innov. 2022 Aug 17;1:100071. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100071. eCollection 2022 Dec.
10
Experiences of Using an Electronic Health Tool Among Health Care Professionals Involved in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Management: Qualitative Analysis.参与慢性阻塞性肺疾病管理的医疗保健专业人员使用电子健康工具的经验:定性分析
JMIR Hum Factors. 2023 Mar 30;10:e43269. doi: 10.2196/43269.
27 个国家的冠心病患者生活方式及对心血管危险因素控制的影响:欧洲心脏病学会 ESC-EORP EUROASPIRE V 注册研究结果。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2019 May;26(8):824-835. doi: 10.1177/2047487318825350. Epub 2019 Feb 10.
4
Cardiac Rehabilitees' Technology Experiences Before Remote Rehabilitation: Qualitative Study Using a Grounded Theory Approach.心脏康复患者在远程康复前的技术体验:基于扎根理论方法的定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Feb 7;21(2):e10985. doi: 10.2196/10985.
5
BENEFIT for all: An ecosystem to facilitate sustained healthy living and reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease.全民受益:一个促进持续健康生活并减轻心血管疾病负担的生态系统。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2019 Apr;26(6):606-608. doi: 10.1177/2047487318816388. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
6
Determinants of Successful eHealth Coaching for Consumer Lifestyle Changes: Qualitative Interview Study Among Health Care Professionals.消费者生活方式改变的成功电子健康指导的决定因素:医疗保健专业人员的定性访谈研究
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jul 5;20(7):e237. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9791.
7
Electronic Health Physical Activity Behavior Change Intervention to Self-Manage Cardiovascular Disease: Qualitative Exploration of Patient and Health Professional Requirements.用于自我管理心血管疾病的电子健康身体活动行为改变干预:对患者和健康专业人员需求的定性探索
J Med Internet Res. 2018 May 8;20(5):e163. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9181.
8
The Effectiveness of Smartphone Apps for Lifestyle Improvement in Noncommunicable Diseases: Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses.智能手机应用程序对改善非传染性疾病生活方式的有效性:系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2018 May 4;20(5):e162. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9751.
9
'Physical activity, that's a tricky subject.' Experiences of health care professionals with physical activity in type 2 diabetes care.“体育活动,这是个棘手的话题。” 医疗保健专业人员在2型糖尿病护理中开展体育活动的经验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr 23;18(1):297. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3102-1.
10
General Practitioners' Perspective on eHealth and Lifestyle Change: Qualitative Interview Study.全科医生对电子健康与生活方式改变的看法:定性访谈研究
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Apr 17;6(4):e88. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.8988.