Fernández-Delgado Marina, Del Amo-Mateos Esther, Lucas Susana, García-Cubero M Teresa, Coca Mónica
Department of Chemical Engineering and Environmental Technology, University of Valladolid, Dr. Mergelina s/n, 47011 Valladolid, Spain; Institute of Sustainable Processes, Dr. Mergelina s/n, 47011 Valladolid, Spain.
Department of Chemical Engineering and Environmental Technology, University of Valladolid, Dr. Mergelina s/n, 47011 Valladolid, Spain.
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Feb 1;806(Pt 4):150904. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150904. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
The use of mineral fertilizers in agriculture has significantly increased to support the growing global food demand. Organic fertilizers are produced from renewable waste materials to overcome the drawbacks of inorganic fertilizers. The development of novel production processes of organic fertilizers entails a significant advance towards the circular economy that reincorporates waste materials into the production cycle. In this work, the economic and environmental feasibility of an industrial plant with a treatment capacity of 300 kg/h of organic waste for the production of liquid fertilizers has been performed. Two extraction technologies (conventional and microwave) and two solvents (water and alkaline) have been compared to select the most sustainable and profitable scenario for scaling-up. The extraction process consists of 2 steps: extraction followed by a concentration stage (necessary only if water extraction is applied). The resolution of the mass balances shows that the fertilizer production under alkaline conditions is ten times higher than for water-based extraction. The economic analysis demonstrated that the total investment cost of microwave technology (>3.5 M€) is three times higher compared to the conventional extraction technology (<1.5 M€), mainly due to the higher complexity of the equipment. These facts directly impact the minimum selling price, because the fertilizers obtained by conventional extraction with alkaline solvent would have a lower selling price (about 1 €/L). As for environmental assessment, the indicators show that the environmental impact produced by water-based extraction is higher than alkaline-solvent extraction, mainly due to the necessity of a concentration stage of the liquid extract to meet the requirements of European regulations. In view of the results obtained in the economic and environmental evaluation, it could be concluded that the most favourable scenario for scaling up the production of liquid fertilizers from organic waste is the conventional extraction under alkaline conditions.
为满足全球不断增长的粮食需求,农业中矿物肥料的使用量显著增加。有机肥料由可再生废料生产而来,以克服无机肥料的缺点。新型有机肥料生产工艺的发展朝着循环经济迈出了重要一步,即将废料重新纳入生产周期。在这项工作中,对一座处理能力为每小时300千克有机废物以生产液体肥料的工厂进行了经济和环境可行性分析。比较了两种提取技术(传统和微波)以及两种溶剂(水和碱性溶剂),以选择最具可持续性和盈利性的扩大生产方案。提取过程包括两个步骤:提取,随后是浓缩阶段(仅在采用水提取时才需要)。物料平衡的结果表明,碱性条件下的肥料产量比水基提取法高十倍。经济分析表明,微波技术的总投资成本(超过350万欧元)是传统提取技术(低于150万欧元)的三倍,主要是因为设备的复杂性更高。这些因素直接影响最低销售价格,因为采用碱性溶剂传统提取法获得的肥料销售价格会更低(约1欧元/升)。至于环境评估,指标显示水基提取产生的环境影响高于碱性溶剂提取,主要是因为液体提取物需要浓缩阶段以满足欧洲法规的要求。鉴于在经济和环境评估中获得的结果,可以得出结论,从有机废物扩大生产液体肥料最有利的方案是碱性条件下的传统提取法。