• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在三级转诊中心引入机器人辅助子宫切除术的临床和财务影响:连续十年子宫切除术的直接成本分析。

The clinical and financial impact of introducing robotic-assisted hysterectomy in a tertiary referral centre: A direct cost analysis of consecutive hysterectomies during a decade.

机构信息

Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, AZ Sint-Jan Brugge-Oostende AV, Brugge, Belgium.

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Int J Med Robot. 2022 Feb;18(1):e2343. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2343. Epub 2021 Oct 26.

DOI:10.1002/rcs.2343
PMID:34655461
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Economic data and the clinical impact of introducing robotic-assisted hysterectomy in a European setting are scarce with conflicting findings.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, the cost and complication rate of the different approaches of hysterectomy are investigated, both benign and (pre)malignant indications were included.

RESULTS

844 patients were included: 323 (38.3%) patients underwent robotic-assisted hysterectomy (RAH), 317 (37.5%) total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH), and 204 (24.2%) total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). TAH dropped from 67.2% to 25.5% of procedures, whilst RAH rose to 41.8% of cases. The total hospitalisation cost was for RAH €5208.39 (±€916.91), for TAH €5846.61 (±€4464.37) and for TLH €3790.06 (±€1267.05). The postoperative complication rate of TAH (9.1%) was significantly higher in comparison with TLH and RAH (5.4% and 3.1%, respectively, p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

RAH has replaced TAH in most cases, especially for large uteri, early-stage endometrial cancer and in selected endometriosis cases, resulting in reduced morbidity with lower hospitalisation costs. The indications for TLH remained, including menorrhagia, adenomyosis and persistent cervical dysplasia.

摘要

背景

在欧洲环境下,关于引入机器人辅助子宫切除术的经济数据和临床影响较为匮乏,且存在相互矛盾的发现。

方法

在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们研究了不同子宫切除术方法的成本和并发症发生率,包括良性和(前)恶性指征。

结果

共纳入 844 名患者:323 名(38.3%)患者接受了机器人辅助子宫切除术(RAH),317 名(37.5%)患者接受了全腹部子宫切除术(TAH),204 名(24.2%)患者接受了全腹腔镜子宫切除术(TLH)。TAH 的手术比例从 67.2%下降至 25.5%,而 RAH 的手术比例上升至 41.8%。RAH 的总住院费用为 5208.39 欧元(±916.91 欧元),TAH 的总住院费用为 5846.61 欧元(±4464.37 欧元),TLH 的总住院费用为 3790.06 欧元(±1267.05 欧元)。TAH 的术后并发症发生率(9.1%)明显高于 TLH 和 RAH(分别为 5.4%和 3.1%,p=0.005)。

结论

RAH 已取代 TAH 成为大多数情况下的首选术式,尤其是对于大子宫、早期子宫内膜癌和特定的子宫内膜异位症病例,降低了发病率并降低了住院费用。TLH 的适应证仍然存在,包括月经过多、子宫腺肌病和持续性宫颈发育不良。

相似文献

1
The clinical and financial impact of introducing robotic-assisted hysterectomy in a tertiary referral centre: A direct cost analysis of consecutive hysterectomies during a decade.在三级转诊中心引入机器人辅助子宫切除术的临床和财务影响:连续十年子宫切除术的直接成本分析。
Int J Med Robot. 2022 Feb;18(1):e2343. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2343. Epub 2021 Oct 26.
2
The learning curve of introduced robotic-assisted hysterectomy versus skilled laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign gynecologic diseases.引入的机器人辅助子宫切除术与熟练的腹腔镜子宫切除术治疗良性妇科疾病的学习曲线。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2023 Oct;49(10):2494-2500. doi: 10.1111/jog.15741. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
3
Approaches for hysterectomy and implementation of robot-assisted surgery in benign gynaecological disease: A cost analysis study in a large university hospital.良性妇科疾病的子宫切除术方法和机器人辅助手术的实施:大型大学医院的成本分析研究。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2024 Oct;301:105-113. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.07.060. Epub 2024 Jul 27.
4
Comparison of surgical outcomes between robot-assisted and conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy for large uterus.机器人辅助与传统腹腔镜子宫切除术治疗大子宫的手术效果比较。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Oct;17(5):2415-2419. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01673-0. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
5
Comparison of surgical outcomes between robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy and conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy in gynecologic benign disease: a single-center cohort study.机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫切除术与传统全腹腔镜子宫切除术治疗妇科良性疾病的手术效果比较:一项单中心队列研究
J Robot Surg. 2023 Oct;17(5):2221-2228. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01638-3. Epub 2023 Jun 6.
6
Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Benign Pathology Does Not Yield More Perioperative Complications than Abdominal or Vaginal Hysterectomies: Our Experience in Introducing Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.腹腔镜下良性病变子宫切除术的围手术期并发症并不比腹式或阴式子宫切除术更多:我们引入腹腔镜下子宫切除术的经验
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2020 Oct 15;9(4):215-219. doi: 10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_116_19. eCollection 2020 Oct-Dec.
7
Laparoscopic hysterectomy: the Kaiser Permanente San Diego experience.腹腔镜子宫切除术:凯撒医疗集团圣地亚哥分院的经验
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005 Jan-Feb;12(1):16-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2004.12.022.
8
Cost effectiveness analysis of total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for uterine fibroids in Western China: a societal perspective.中国西部地区腹腔镜全子宫切除术与腹式全子宫切除术治疗子宫肌瘤的成本效果分析:基于社会视角。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb 24;22(1):252. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07644-9.
9
Multicenter analysis comparing robotic, open, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomies performed by high-volume surgeons for benign indications.多中心分析:比较由高手术量外科医生进行的机器人辅助、开放、腹腔镜及经阴道子宫切除术治疗良性疾病的效果
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016 Jun;133(3):359-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.11.010. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
10
Abdominal, multi-port and single-port total laparoscopic hysterectomy: eleven-year trends comparison of surgical outcomes complications of 936 cases.腹部、多端口与单端口全腹腔镜子宫切除术:936例手术结果及并发症的11年趋势比较
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Jun;291(6):1313-9. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3576-y. Epub 2014 Dec 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of robotic surgery compared to conventional laparoscopy for the management of early-stage cervical cancer: a model-based economic evaluation in China.机器人手术与传统腹腔镜治疗早期宫颈癌的成本效益比较:基于模型的中国经济学评价。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 20;14(11):e087113. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087113.