Suppr超能文献

中国西部地区腹腔镜全子宫切除术与腹式全子宫切除术治疗子宫肌瘤的成本效果分析:基于社会视角。

Cost effectiveness analysis of total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for uterine fibroids in Western China: a societal perspective.

机构信息

School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, 710061, People's Republic of China.

School of Public Policy and Administration, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710049, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb 24;22(1):252. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07644-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

As a common female pelvic tumor, uterine fibroids remain the leading cause for hysterectomy in China. Hysterectomy provides a good surgical treatment of uterine fibroids, and it guarantees the removal of all uterine fibroids without lower risk of recurrence. This study compares the cost effectiveness of total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) versus total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) for women with uterine fibroids from a societal perspective.

METHODS

An economic analysis was conducted in 392 patients (TLH n = 75; TAH n = 317), including all relevant costs over a 12-month time horizon. Primary outcome was major surgical complications; secondary outcomes were postoperative discomfort symptoms and time of return to normal activities. Clinical, outcomes and costs data were collected from medical records, telephone survey and financial information system. Generalized linear models were used to assess costs and outcomes differences between the two groups. Incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) was used to estimate the cost effectiveness.

RESULTS

Mean direct costs were $2,925.71 for TLH, $2,436.24 for TAH, respectively. Mean indirect costs were $1,133.22 for TLH, $1,394.85 for TAH, respectively. Incremental societal costs were $256.86 (95%CI: 249.03-264.69). Mean differences in outcome were: 4.53% (95%CI: 4.35-4.71) for major surgical complications; 6.75% (95%CI: 6.45-7.05) for postoperative discomfort symptoms; 1.27 (95%CI: 1.23-1.30) weeks for time to return to normal activities. ICER of TLH was $5,669.16 (95%CI: 5,384.76-5,955.56) per complication averted, $3,801.54 (95%CI: 3,634.81-3,968.28) per postoperative discomfort symptoms averted and $202.96 (95%CI: 194.97-210.95) per week saved to return to normal activities.

CONCLUSIONS

TLH is cost effective compared with TAH in preventing additional complications based on our estimated conservative threshold in China. The findings provide useful information for researchers to conduct further cost effectiveness analysis based on prospective study which can provide stronger and more evidence, in China. In addition, the data may be useful for Chinese health care policy-makers and medical insurance payers to make related health care decisions.

摘要

背景

作为一种常见的女性盆腔肿瘤,子宫肌瘤仍然是中国子宫切除术的主要原因。子宫切除术为子宫肌瘤提供了良好的手术治疗,它可以保证所有子宫肌瘤的切除,复发风险较低。本研究从社会角度比较了全腹腔镜子宫切除术(TLH)与全腹部子宫切除术(TAH)治疗子宫肌瘤的成本效果。

方法

对 392 名患者(TLH 组 n=75;TAH 组 n=317)进行了经济分析,包括 12 个月时间内的所有相关成本。主要手术并发症为主要结局;次要结局为术后不适症状和恢复正常活动时间。临床、结局和成本数据来自病历、电话调查和财务信息系统。使用广义线性模型评估两组间成本和结局差异。增量成本效果比(ICER)用于估计成本效果。

结果

TLH 的直接成本均值为 2925.71 美元,TAH 的直接成本均值为 2436.24 美元。TLH 的间接成本均值为 1133.22 美元,TAH 的间接成本均值为 1394.85 美元。社会增量成本为 256.86 美元(95%CI:249.03-264.69)。结果差异的平均值为:主要手术并发症 4.53%(95%CI:4.35-4.71);术后不适症状 6.75%(95%CI:6.45-7.05);恢复正常活动时间 1.27 周(95%CI:1.23-1.30)。TLH 的 ICER 为避免每例并发症 5669.16 美元(95%CI:5384.76-5955.56)、避免每例术后不适症状 3801.54 美元(95%CI:3634.81-3868.28)和避免每周恢复正常活动 202.96 美元(95%CI:194.97-210.95)。

结论

基于我们在中国的保守阈值估计,TLH 在预防额外并发症方面比 TAH 更具成本效果。研究结果为研究人员提供了有用的信息,以便在中国进行进一步的成本效果分析,提供更强有力的证据。此外,这些数据可能对中国医疗保健政策制定者和医疗保险支付者做出相关医疗保健决策有用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c158/8867663/a0c29c4400a1/12913_2022_7644_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验