University of Lille, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille, Service des Maladies du Sang, Lille, France.
Department of Hematology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, USA.
Lancet Oncol. 2021 Nov;22(11):1582-1596. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00466-6. Epub 2021 Oct 13.
BACKGROUND: In the primary analysis of the phase 3 MAIA trial (median follow-up 28·0 months), a significant improvement in progression-free survival was observed with daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone in transplantation-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Here, we report the updated efficacy and safety results from a prespecified interim analysis for overall survival. METHODS: MAIA is an ongoing, multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial that enrolled patients at 176 hospitals in 14 countries across North America, Europe, the Middle East, and the Asia-Pacific region. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, had newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0-2, and were ineligible for high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation because of their age (≥65 years) or comorbidities. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using randomly permuted blocks (block size 4) by an interactive web response system to receive 28-day cycles of intravenous daratumumab (16 mg/kg, once per week during cycles 1-2, once every 2 weeks in cycles 3-6, and once every 4 weeks thereafter) plus oral lenalidomide (25 mg on days 1-21 of each cycle) and oral dexamethasone (40 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of each cycle; daratumumab group) or lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone (control group). Randomisation was stratified by International Staging System disease stage, geographical region, and age. Neither patients nor investigators were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, which was centrally assessed, and a secondary endpoint was overall survival (both assessed in the intention-to-treat population). The safety population included patients who received at least one dose of the study treatment. The results presented here are from a prespecified interim analysis for overall survival, for which the prespecified stopping boundary was p=0·0414. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02252172. FINDINGS: Between March 18, 2015, and Jan 15, 2017, 952 patients were assessed for eligibility, of whom 737 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the daratumumab group (n=368) or the control group (n=369). At a median follow-up of 56·2 months (IQR 52·7-59·9), median progression-free survival was not reached (95% CI 54·8-not reached) in the daratumumab group versus 34·4 months (29·6-39·2) in the control group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·53 [95% CI 0·43-0·66]; p<0·0001). Median overall survival was not reached in either group (daratumumab group, 95% CI not reached-not reached; control group, 95% CI 55·7-not reached; HR 0·68 [95% CI 0·53-0·86]; p=0·0013). The most common (>15%) grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events were neutropenia (197 [54%] patients in the daratumumab group vs 135 [37%] patients in the control group), pneumonia (70 [19%] vs 39 [11%]), anaemia (61 [17%] vs 79 [22%]), and lymphopenia (60 [16%] vs 41 [11%]). Serious adverse events occurred in 281 (77%) patients in the daratumumab group and 257 (70%) patients in the control group. Treatment-related deaths occurred in 13 (4%) patients in the daratumumab group and ten (3%) patients in the control group. INTERPRETATION: Daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone increased overall survival and progression-free survival in patients ineligible for stem-cell transplantation with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. There were no new safety concerns. Our results support the frontline use of daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone for patients with multiple myeloma who are ineligible for transplantation. FUNDING: Janssen Research & Development.
背景:在 3 期 MAIA 试验的主要分析中(中位随访 28.0 个月),与来那度胺和地塞米松单用相比,达雷妥尤单抗联合来那度胺和地塞米松治疗不适合移植的新诊断多发性骨髓瘤患者,在无进展生存期方面有显著改善。在此,我们报告了针对总生存期的预先指定中期分析的更新疗效和安全性结果。
方法:MAIA 是一项正在进行的、多中心、随机、开放性、3 期试验,在北美、欧洲、中东和亚太地区的 176 家医院招募了患者。入组患者年龄为 18 岁及以上,患有新诊断的多发性骨髓瘤,东部肿瘤协作组体能状态评分为 0-2 分,由于年龄(≥65 岁)或合并症而不适合大剂量化疗联合自体干细胞移植。患者使用交互式网络应答系统,以 1:1 的比例随机分配(1 个随机区组 4 例),接受 28 天周期的静脉注射达雷妥尤单抗(第 1-2 周期 16mg/kg,第 3-6 周期每 2 周 1 次,之后每 4 周 1 次)联合口服来那度胺(每周期第 1-21 天 25mg)和口服地塞米松(每周期第 1、8、15 和 22 天 40mg;达雷妥尤单抗组)或来那度胺和地塞米松单用(对照组)。随机分组根据国际分期系统疾病分期、地理位置和年龄进行分层。患者和研究者均未对治疗分配设盲。主要终点为无进展生存期,由中心评估,次要终点为总生存期(均在意向治疗人群中评估)。安全性人群包括至少接受过一次研究治疗的患者。这里报告的结果是来自针对总生存期的预先指定中期分析,其预先指定的停止边界为 p=0.0414。该试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册,编号为 NCT02252172。
结果:在 2015 年 3 月 18 日至 2017 年 1 月 15 日期间,共有 952 名患者接受了入选评估,其中 737 名患者入组并随机分配到达雷妥尤单抗组(n=368)或对照组(n=369)。在中位随访 56.2 个月(IQR 52.7-59.9)时,达雷妥尤单抗组中位无进展生存期未达到(95%CI 54.8-未达到),而对照组为 34.4 个月(29.6-39.2)(HR 0.53[95%CI 0.43-0.66];p<0.0001)。两组均未达到中位总生存期(达雷妥尤单抗组 95%CI 未达到-未达到;对照组 95%CI 55.7-未达到;HR 0.68[95%CI 0.53-0.86];p=0.0013)。最常见(>15%)的 3 级或更高级别的治疗相关不良事件为中性粒细胞减少症(达雷妥尤单抗组 197 例[54%],对照组 135 例[37%])、肺炎(70 例[19%] vs 39 例[11%])、贫血(61 例[17%] vs 79 例[22%])和淋巴细胞减少症(60 例[16%] vs 41 例[11%])。达雷妥尤单抗组有 281 例(77%)患者和对照组有 257 例(70%)患者发生严重不良事件。达雷妥尤单抗组有 13 例(4%)患者和对照组有 10 例(3%)患者发生治疗相关死亡。
解释:对于不适合干细胞移植的新诊断多发性骨髓瘤患者,达雷妥尤单抗联合来那度胺和地塞米松可提高总生存期和无进展生存期。没有新的安全性问题。我们的结果支持达雷妥尤单抗联合来那度胺和地塞米松用于不适合移植的多发性骨髓瘤患者的一线治疗。
资金来源:杨森研发公司。
Cell Biol Toxicol. 2025-8-1
Immunotargets Ther. 2025-6-24