Suppr超能文献

移植不适用的新诊断多发性骨髓瘤患者一线双联或三联方案起始治疗的预测因素

Predictors of frontline doublet or triplet regimen initiation in transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

作者信息

Pianko Matthew J, Gupta-Werner Niodita, Emond Bruno, Lefebvre Patrick, Lafeuille Marie-Hélène, Cortoos Annelore, Kaila Shuchita

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Johnson and Johnson Innovative Medicine, US Medical Affairs, Horsham, PA, USA.

出版信息

Future Sci OA. 2025 Dec;11(1):2528523. doi: 10.1080/20565623.2025.2528523. Epub 2025 Jul 12.

Abstract

AIMS

To identify predictors for initiation of frontline doublet versus triplet therapy for transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using Flatiron Health data, a random forest model was used to identify baseline predictors of frontline doublet or triplet use.

RESULTS

The random forest model had good predictive power, with 74% probability of successfully predicting the regimen received (doublets or triplets) for a given patient. Regression analyses found that patients treated with doublets were more likely to be older (age ≥80 versus <60 years: odds ratio [OR] = 0.15,  < 0.001) and frail (frail versus fit: OR = 0.73,  = 0.023). Predictors of triplet regimen use included Black race (Black versus white: OR = 1.31,  = 0.025), urban state (urban versus rural: OR = 1.38,  = 0.042), ≥1 form of trisomy (OR = 1.39,  < 0.001), del(17/17p) (OR = 1.87,  < 0.001), detectable M protein (OR = 1.33,  < 0.001), higher disease stage per International Staging System (stage 2 versus 1: OR = 1.42,  = 0.001; stage 3 versus 1: OR = 1.35,  = 0.005), and ≥1 diagnosis for musculoskeletal and connective tissue diseases (OR = 1.45,  = 0.002). Triplet regimen use increased in recent years.

CONCLUSIONS

While frontline triplet therapies have shown improved efficacy over doublets with tolerable safety, doublet use remains in older and frail patients, creating an opportunity to improve outcomes in this particular patient population.

摘要

目的

确定不适合移植的新诊断多发性骨髓瘤患者一线采用双药联合治疗与三药联合治疗的预测因素。

材料与方法

利用Flatiron Health数据,采用随机森林模型确定一线使用双药或三药的基线预测因素。

结果

随机森林模型具有良好的预测能力,对于给定患者成功预测其接受的治疗方案(双药或三药)的概率为74%。回归分析发现,接受双药治疗的患者年龄较大(年龄≥80岁与<60岁:比值比[OR]=0.15,P<0.001)且身体虚弱(虚弱与健康:OR=0.73,P=0.023)。使用三药方案的预测因素包括黑人种族(黑人与白人:OR=1.31,P=0.025)、城市州(城市与农村:OR=1.38,P=0.042)、≥1种三体形式(OR=1.39,P<0.001)、del(17/17p)(OR=1.87,P<0.001)、可检测到的M蛋白(OR=1.33,P<0.001)、根据国际分期系统疾病分期较高(2期与1期:OR=1.42,P=0.001;3期与1期:OR=1.35,P=0.005)以及≥1种肌肉骨骼和结缔组织疾病诊断(OR=1.45,P=0.002)。近年来三药方案的使用有所增加。

结论

虽然一线三药联合治疗已显示出比双药联合治疗疗效更佳且安全性可耐受,但双药联合治疗仍用于老年和体弱患者,这为改善这一特定患者群体的治疗效果创造了机会。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验