• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社交焦虑与二元互动中的积极性产生:好奇心和真实性是成功的关键。

Social Anxiety and the Generation of Positivity During Dyadic Interaction: Curiosity and Authenticity Are the Keys to Success.

机构信息

University of Waterloo; University of Manitoba.

University of Waterloo.

出版信息

Behav Ther. 2021 Nov;52(6):1418-1432. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2021.03.011. Epub 2021 Mar 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.beth.2021.03.011
PMID:34656196
Abstract

What drives positive affective and interpersonal experiences during social interaction? Undergraduates with high (n = 63) or low (n = 56) trait social anxiety (SA) were paired with unfamiliar low SA partners in a 45-minute conversation task. Throughout the task, participants and their conversation partners completed measures of affiliative goals, affect, curiosity, authenticity, and attentional focus. Both affective and interpersonal outcomes were assessed. Dyadic analyses revealed that participants' affiliative goals during the social interaction predicted positive outcomes for both themselves and their partners, although the link between affiliative goals and positive affect was weaker for participants with high SA. Mediation analyses demonstrated that adopting affiliative goals may promote more positive outcomes by increasing participants' curiosity and felt authenticity. Taken together, results illuminate the pathways through which people with varying levels of trait SA may derive interpersonally generated positive affect and positive social outcomes, with implications for clinical theory and practice.

摘要

在社交互动中,是什么驱动积极的情感和人际体验?将具有高(n=63)或低(n=56)特质社交焦虑(SA)的大学生与不熟悉的低 SA 伙伴配对,进行 45 分钟的对话任务。在整个任务中,参与者及其对话伙伴完成了亲和目标、情感、好奇心、真实性和注意力焦点的测量。评估了二元结果。对偶分析表明,参与者在社交互动过程中的亲和目标预测了他们自己和他们的伙伴的积极结果,尽管对于高 SA 的参与者来说,亲和目标与积极情感之间的联系较弱。中介分析表明,通过增加参与者的好奇心和真实感,采用亲和目标可能会促进更积极的结果。总之,这些结果阐明了具有不同特质 SA 水平的人可能从人际产生的积极情感和积极的社会结果中获得积极影响的途径,对临床理论和实践具有启示意义。

相似文献

1
Social Anxiety and the Generation of Positivity During Dyadic Interaction: Curiosity and Authenticity Are the Keys to Success.社交焦虑与二元互动中的积极性产生:好奇心和真实性是成功的关键。
Behav Ther. 2021 Nov;52(6):1418-1432. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2021.03.011. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
2
Conflicting patterns of cardiovascular reactivity, self-report, and behavior associated with social anxiety during a conversation with a close friend.在与亲密朋友交谈过程中,与社交焦虑相关的心血管反应、自我报告和行为表现出相互矛盾的模式。
Psychophysiology. 2024 Oct;61(10):e14629. doi: 10.1111/psyp.14629. Epub 2024 Jun 17.
3
Psychometric Evaluation of a Controlled Social Affiliation Paradigm: Findings From Anxiety, Depressive Disorder, and Healthy Samples.控制社会关联范式的心理计量学评估:来自焦虑症、抑郁症和健康样本的研究结果。
Behav Ther. 2021 Nov;52(6):1464-1476. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2021.04.003. Epub 2021 May 1.
4
Childhood Trauma Predicts Positive Expressive Suppression During Social Affiliation in Adults With Anxiety and/or Depression: Implications for Social Functioning.童年创伤预测焦虑和/或抑郁成年人在社交联系中积极表达抑制:对社交功能的影响。
Behav Ther. 2023 Mar;54(2):375-385. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2022.10.003. Epub 2022 Nov 2.
5
The neglected relationship between social interaction anxiety and hedonic deficits: differentiation from depressive symptoms.社交互动焦虑与享乐缺陷之间被忽视的关系:与抑郁症状的区分。
J Anxiety Disord. 2004;18(5):719-30. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2003.08.001.
6
Coping with social wounds: How social pain and social anxiety influence access to social rewards.应对社会创伤:社会痛苦和社会焦虑如何影响社会奖励的获取。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2020 Sep;68:101572. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2020.101572. Epub 2020 Apr 11.
7
Social goals as predictors of children's in vivo emotional responses to social challenges.作为儿童对社会挑战的实际情绪反应预测指标的社会目标
Child Dev. 2023 Mar;94(2):424-438. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13869. Epub 2022 Oct 29.
8
How real do you feel? Self- and partner-authenticity in social anxiety disorder.你感觉有多真实?社交焦虑障碍中的自我和伴侣真实性。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2021 Feb;130(2):166-176. doi: 10.1037/abn0000622. Epub 2020 Dec 21.
9
Electrophysiological evidence for the importance of interpersonal curiosity.人际好奇心的重要性的电生理学证据。
Brain Res. 2013 Mar 15;1500:45-54. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.12.046. Epub 2013 Jan 16.
10
Hedonic Benefits of Close and Distant Interaction Partners: The Mediating Roles of Social Approval and Authenticity.近距离和远距离互动伙伴的享乐效益:社会认可和真实性的中介作用。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2017 Sep;43(9):1255-1267. doi: 10.1177/0146167217711917. Epub 2017 Jun 15.

引用本文的文献

1
The effects of listening on speaker and listener while talking about character strengths: an open science school-wide collaboration.在谈论性格优势时倾听对说话者和倾听者的影响:一项全校范围的开放科学合作。
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Dec 18;11(12):221342. doi: 10.1098/rsos.221342. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Interpersonal curiosity as a tool to foster safe relational spaces: a narrative literature review.将人际好奇心作为营造安全关系空间的工具:一项叙述性文献综述
Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 13;15:1379330. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1379330. eCollection 2024.
3
Neurocognitive Model of Schema-Congruent and -Incongruent Learning in Clinical Disorders: Application to Social Anxiety and Beyond.
临床障碍中模式一致和不一致学习的神经认知模型:在社交焦虑及其他方面的应用。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2023 Nov;18(6):1412-1435. doi: 10.1177/17456916221141351. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
4
Are people with social anxiety disorder happier alone?社交焦虑障碍患者独处时更快乐吗?
J Anxiety Disord. 2021 Dec;84:102474. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2021.102474. Epub 2021 Sep 1.