Suppr超能文献

评估用于 NTRK 融合检测的靶向下一代测序检测方法和参考材料。

Evaluating Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing Assays and Reference Materials for NTRK Fusion Detection.

机构信息

Genentech Research and Early Development, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California.

Division of Hematology/Oncology, Samsung Medical Center Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Mol Diagn. 2022 Jan;24(1):18-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2021.09.008. Epub 2021 Oct 15.

Abstract

Neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK1/2/3) fusions are oncogenic drivers in approximately 0.3% of solid tumors. High-quality testing to identify patients with NTRK fusion-positive tumors who could benefit from tropomyosin receptor kinase inhibitors is recommended, but the current NTRK testing landscape, including next-generation sequencing (NGS), is fragmented and availability of assays varies widely. The analytical and clinical performance of four commonly available RNA-based NGS assays, Archer's FusionPlex Lung panel (AFL), Illumina's TruSight Oncology 500 (TSO500), Thermo Fisher's Oncomine Precision Assay and Oncomine Focus Assay (OFA), were evaluated. Experiments were conducted using contrived samples [formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded cell lines and SeraSeq formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded reference material], NTRK fusion-negative clinical samples, and NTRK fusion-positive clinical samples, according to local assays. Estimated limit of detection varied across the four assays: 30 to 620 fusion copies for AFL (cell lines), versus approximately 30 to 290 copies for TSO500 and approximately 1 to 28 copies for OFA and Oncomine Precision Assay. All assays showed 100% specificity for NTRK fusions detection, but quality control pass rate was variable (AFL, 43%; TSO500, 77%; and OFA, 83%). The NTRK fusion detection rate in quality control-validated clinical samples was 100% for all assays. This comparison of the strengths and limitations of four RNA-based NGS assays will inform physicians and pathologists regarding optimal assay selection to identify patients with NTRK fusion-positive tumors.

摘要

神经酪氨酸受体激酶(NTRK1/2/3)融合是约 0.3%实体肿瘤中的致癌驱动因素。建议进行高质量的检测,以确定可能受益于原肌球蛋白受体激酶抑制剂的 NTRK 融合阳性肿瘤患者,但目前的 NTRK 检测格局,包括下一代测序(NGS),是分散的,检测方法的可用性差异很大。评估了四种常用的基于 RNA 的 NGS 检测方法,即 Archer 的 FusionPlex Lung 面板(AFL)、Illumina 的 TruSight Oncology 500(TSO500)、Thermo Fisher 的 Oncomine Precision Assay 和 Oncomine Focus Assay(OFA)的分析和临床性能。根据当地的检测方法,使用人工样本(福尔马林固定、石蜡包埋的细胞系和 SeraSeq 福尔马林固定、石蜡包埋的参考材料)、NTRK 融合阴性的临床样本和 NTRK 融合阳性的临床样本进行了实验。四个检测方法的估计检测限各不相同:AFL(细胞系)为 30 到 620 个融合拷贝,而 TSO500 大约为 30 到 290 个拷贝,OFA 和 Oncomine Precision Assay 大约为 1 到 28 个拷贝。所有检测方法对 NTRK 融合检测的特异性均为 100%,但质量控制通过率不同(AFL,43%;TSO500,77%;OFA,83%)。所有检测方法在经过质量控制验证的临床样本中 NTRK 融合检测率均为 100%。本研究比较了四种基于 RNA 的 NGS 检测方法的优缺点,为医生和病理学家选择最佳检测方法来识别 NTRK 融合阳性肿瘤患者提供了信息。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验