Suppr超能文献

RPPH1 实时定量 PCR 对照检测结合位点的罕见变异导致拷贝数错误调用。

Rare Variants in RPPH1 Real-Time Quantitative PCR Control Assay Binding Sites Result in Incorrect Copy Number Calls.

机构信息

Division of Genetics, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York.

Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.

出版信息

J Mol Diagn. 2022 Jan;24(1):33-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2021.09.007. Epub 2021 Oct 15.

Abstract

Real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) using RPPH1 as a reference gene is a standard method for assessment and validation of genomic copy number variations. However, variants in the reference amplicon may cause errors, which was investigated herein. While conducting copy number variation validations for birth defects research studies, 13 of 1634 specimens with multiple loci that appeared to be present as three copies were unexpectedly detected. This apparent trisomy was hypothesized to be an amplification artifact caused by a variant in the RPPH1 amplicon. Sequencing revealed all 13 individuals carried one of the four different variants within the RPPH1 amplicon. These variants could produce allelic dropout or altered reaction efficiency, causing an inaccurate measurement of copy number. Additional genotyping predicted a low frequency of the most common variant (rs3093876; 14/3562 alleles; minor allele frequency, 0.39%). Laboratories should recognize the potential for inaccurate results when using a single qPCR control assay. Overestimated CFTR and SMN2 copy numbers identified during newborn screening that otherwise would have been incorrectly called were also detected. Variants in reference loci may produce false-negative normal results for test loci when real deletions are present. For clinical laboratories screening for heterozygous deletions for diagnostic testing or prenatal/carrier screening via qPCR, the most cost-effective solution to maximize sensitivity is to run triplex reactions targeting the region of interest with two control genes.

摘要

实时定量 PCR(qPCR)使用 RPPH1 作为参考基因是评估和验证基因组拷贝数变异的标准方法。然而,参考扩增子中的变体可能会导致错误,本文对此进行了研究。在进行出生缺陷研究中拷贝数变异的验证时,1634 个多个位点的样本中,有 13 个样本出乎意料地被检测为三倍体。这种明显的三体被假设为 RPPH1 扩增子中的变异引起的扩增假象。测序显示,这 13 个人都携带 RPPH1 扩增子内的四个不同变体之一。这些变体可能导致等位基因缺失或反应效率改变,从而导致拷贝数的不准确测量。额外的基因分型预测最常见变体(rs3093876;14/3562 个等位基因;次要等位基因频率,0.39%)的低频率。当使用单一 qPCR 对照测定时,实验室应认识到结果不准确的可能性。在新生儿筛查中识别出的 CFTR 和 SMN2 拷贝数过高,否则这些拷贝数会被错误地判断。当存在实际缺失时,参考基因座中的变体可能会导致测试基因座的假阴性正常结果。对于通过 qPCR 进行杂合缺失诊断检测或产前/携带者筛查的临床实验室,为了最大限度地提高灵敏度,最具成本效益的解决方案是运行三重复应,针对感兴趣的区域,使用两个对照基因。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

6
Discrepancy in redetermination of copy numbers in children with SMA.脊髓性肌萎缩症患儿拷贝数重新测定中的差异。
Neurology. 2019 Aug 6;93(6):267-269. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000007836. Epub 2019 Jun 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验