Hospital for Small Animals, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK.
J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio). 2021 Nov;31(6):742-748. doi: 10.1111/vec.13149. Epub 2021 Oct 17.
To determine the in vitro compatibility of rabbit and canine blood using both a tube and slide agglutination crossmatch technique and to compare the results obtained from these 2 methods.
Prospective observational laboratory study from January to March 2020.
University veterinary teaching hospital.
Six client-owned rabbits ≥3.5 kg undergoing phlebotomy for a clinical reason. "Pigtail" blood samples from 3 dog erythrocyte antigen (DEA) 1-positive and 3 DEA 1-negative canine packed red blood cell units.
Blood from each rabbit was crossmatched with a single unit of canine blood using both a standard laboratory tube agglutination technique and a simple slide agglutination method with each rabbit/canine unit serving as its own intraassay control. Tube crossmatches were evaluated for agglutination both macro- and microscopically and assessed for hemolysis. Slide crossmatches were assessed for the presence of agglutination both macro- and microscopically. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: All crossmatches were incompatible. Varying degrees of agglutination were seen for all crossmatches. Hemolysis was observed with all minor tube crossmatches. Results of both crossmatch techniques were in close agreement. CONCLUSIONS: The crossmatch results in this present study strongly demonstrate in vitro incompatibility between canine and rabbit blood. Agreement between the 2 techniques in this study indicates that the slide agglutination technique may be quicker, require less blood, and provide reliable results in exclusively assessing the compatibility of canine and rabbit blood. Based on the results of this study, emergency xenotransfusion of canine blood to rabbits cannot be recommended.
使用管和玻片凝集交叉配血技术确定兔和犬血的体外相容性,并比较这两种方法的结果。
2020 年 1 月至 3 月进行的前瞻性观察性实验室研究。
大学兽医教学医院。
因临床原因接受采血的 6 只 ≥3.5kg 的患宠兔。来自 3 个犬红细胞抗原(DEA)1 阳性和 3 个 DEA 1 阴性犬浓缩红细胞单位的“猪尾”血样。
使用标准实验室管凝集技术和简单的玻片凝集方法,将每只兔子的血液与单一单位的犬血进行交叉配血,每个兔子/犬单位作为自身内试验对照。管交叉配血均进行宏观和微观凝集评估,并评估溶血。玻片交叉配血评估宏观和微观凝集。
所有交叉配血均不相容。所有交叉配血均出现不同程度的凝集。所有微小管交叉配血均观察到溶血。两种交叉配血技术的结果非常一致。
本研究中的交叉配血结果强烈表明犬血和兔血在体外不相容。本研究中两种技术的一致性表明,玻片凝集技术可能更快,所需血量更少,并可在专门评估犬血和兔血相容性时提供可靠结果。基于本研究的结果,不能推荐将犬血紧急异种输血给兔。