• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

晚期癌症患者的症状发生率和死亡地点偏好:与实现居家死亡相关的因素。

Symptom Prevalence and Place of Death Preference in Advanced Cancer Patients: Factors Associated With the Achievement of Home Death.

机构信息

Supportive & Palliative Care Department, Sunway Medical Centre, Selangor, Malaysia.

Clinical Research Centre, Sunway Medical Centre, Selangor, Malaysia.

出版信息

Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2022 Jul;39(7):762-771. doi: 10.1177/10499091211048767. Epub 2021 Oct 17.

DOI:10.1177/10499091211048767
PMID:34657488
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9210115/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Achievement of patients' preferred place of death is recognized as a component of a good death. This study aimed to investigate the symptom burden in advanced cancer patients, achievement of their place of death preferences and factors associated with home death.

METHODS

In this retrospective review of 287 patient deaths, we examined patients' symptom prevalence, preferred and actual place of death and achievement of their place of death preferences using descriptive statistics. Associations between patient factors, home death preference and actual home death were further analyzed using multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

The most prevalent symptoms were weakness, pain and poor appetite, with a mean of 5.77(SD: 2.37) symptoms per patient. The median interval from palliative care referral to death was 21 (IQR: 74) days. Of the 253 patients with documented place of death preference, 132 (52.1%) preferred home death, 111(43.9%) preferred hospital death, 1 (0.4%) preferred to die at a temple and 9(3.6%) expressed no preference. Overall, 221 of 241(91.7%) patients with known actual place of death achieved their preference. Older patients were more likely to prefer home death (OR 1.021; 95% CI 1.004-1.039, p = 0.018) and die at home (OR 1.023; 95% CI 1.005-1.041, p = 0.014). Gender, marital status, cancer diagnosis and symptoms were not associated with preference for or actual home death.

CONCLUSION

Despite a high symptom burden, most patients preferred and achieved a home death. Late palliative care referral and difficult symptom management contributed to failure to fulfill home death preference. Preference for home death should be considered when managing terminally ill geriatric patients.

摘要

目的

实现患者首选的死亡地点被认为是善终的一个组成部分。本研究旨在调查晚期癌症患者的症状负担,以及他们对死亡地点偏好的实现情况,并分析与在家中死亡相关的因素。

方法

在这项对 287 例患者死亡的回顾性研究中,我们使用描述性统计方法检查了患者的症状发生率、首选和实际死亡地点以及他们对死亡地点偏好的实现情况。进一步使用多变量逻辑回归分析了患者因素、在家中死亡偏好与实际在家中死亡之间的关联。

结果

最常见的症状是虚弱、疼痛和食欲不振,每位患者平均有 5.77(SD:2.37)种症状。从姑息治疗转介到死亡的中位时间为 21(IQR:74)天。在有记录的死亡地点偏好的 253 名患者中,132 名(52.1%)首选在家中死亡,111 名(43.9%)首选在医院死亡,1 名(0.4%)首选在寺庙中死亡,9 名(3.6%)表示没有偏好。总的来说,241 名已知实际死亡地点的患者中有 221 名(91.7%)实现了他们的偏好。年龄较大的患者更有可能选择在家中死亡(OR 1.021;95%CI 1.004-1.039,p = 0.018)并在家中死亡(OR 1.023;95%CI 1.005-1.041,p = 0.014)。性别、婚姻状况、癌症诊断和症状与在家中死亡偏好或实际死亡无关。

结论

尽管存在较高的症状负担,但大多数患者首选并实现了在家中死亡。姑息治疗的延迟转介和难以控制的症状管理导致无法满足在家中死亡的偏好。在管理晚期老年患者时,应考虑在家中死亡的偏好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a185/9210115/f8e9628c947e/10.1177_10499091211048767-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a185/9210115/6a39b54fbb20/10.1177_10499091211048767-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a185/9210115/b71797cf857a/10.1177_10499091211048767-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a185/9210115/21f5dac22316/10.1177_10499091211048767-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a185/9210115/f8e9628c947e/10.1177_10499091211048767-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a185/9210115/6a39b54fbb20/10.1177_10499091211048767-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a185/9210115/b71797cf857a/10.1177_10499091211048767-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a185/9210115/21f5dac22316/10.1177_10499091211048767-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a185/9210115/f8e9628c947e/10.1177_10499091211048767-fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
Symptom Prevalence and Place of Death Preference in Advanced Cancer Patients: Factors Associated With the Achievement of Home Death.晚期癌症患者的症状发生率和死亡地点偏好:与实现居家死亡相关的因素。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2022 Jul;39(7):762-771. doi: 10.1177/10499091211048767. Epub 2021 Oct 17.
2
Social and clinical determinants of preferences and their achievement at the end of life: prospective cohort study of older adults receiving palliative care in three countries.社会和临床决定因素对生命终末期偏好及其实现的影响:对三个国家接受姑息治疗的老年患者的前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Nov 23;17(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0648-4.
3
Predictors of the final place of care of patients with advanced cancer receiving integrated home-based palliative care: a retrospective cohort study.接受综合家庭姑息治疗的晚期癌症患者最终护理地点的预测因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Oct 18;20(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00865-5.
4
Congruence between Preferred and Actual Place of Death for Those in Receipt of Home-Based Palliative Care.接受居家姑息治疗人群的期望死亡地点与实际死亡地点的一致性。
J Palliat Med. 2020 Nov;23(11):1460-1467. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0582. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
5
Place-of-death preferences among patients with cancer and family caregivers in inpatient and outpatient palliative care.癌症患者和门诊及住院姑息治疗患者家属的临终关怀地点选择偏好。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2022 Oct;12(e4):e501-e504. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-002019. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
6
Hospice assist at home: does the integration of hospice care in primary healthcare support patients to die in their preferred location - A retrospective cross-sectional evaluation study.居家临终关怀:初级医疗保健中临终关怀的整合是否有助于支持患者在其首选地点离世——一项回顾性横断面评估研究。
Palliat Med. 2016 Jun;30(6):580-6. doi: 10.1177/0269216315626353. Epub 2016 Jan 26.
7
Place of Death for Adults Receiving Specialist Palliative Care in Their Last 3 Months of Life: Factors Associated With Preferred Place, Actual Place, and Place of Death Congruence.成年人在生命的最后 3 个月接受专科姑息治疗后的死亡地点:与首选地点、实际地点和死亡地点一致性相关的因素。
J Palliat Care. 2024 Jul;39(3):184-193. doi: 10.1177/08258597241231042. Epub 2024 Feb 25.
8
Preferred place of death in paediatric, teenage and young adult haemato-oncology patients: a retrospective review.儿科、青少年和成年轻度血液肿瘤患者的首选死亡地点:回顾性研究。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2022 Nov;12(e5):e650-e653. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-002005. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
9
Family preference for place of death mediates the relationship between patient preference and actual place of death: a nationwide retrospective cross-sectional study.家庭对死亡地点的偏好调节了患者偏好与实际死亡地点之间的关系:一项全国性回顾性横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e56848. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056848. Epub 2013 Mar 8.
10
Insights into the factors associated with achieving the preference of home death in terminal cancer: A national population-based study.深入探讨与晚期癌症患者选择在家中离世相关的因素:一项基于全国人口的研究。
Palliat Support Care. 2018 Dec;16(6):749-755. doi: 10.1017/S1478951517000876. Epub 2017 Nov 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors affecting the place of death in patients with liver cancer in China, 2013-2020: A population-based study.2013 - 2020年中国肝癌患者死亡地点的影响因素:一项基于人群的研究
Cancer Pathog Ther. 2024 Apr 12;3(2):163-172. doi: 10.1016/j.cpt.2024.04.001. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Telehealth-facilitated palliative care enables more people to die at home: An analysis of clinical outcomes and service activity data.远程医疗辅助的姑息治疗使更多人能够在家中离世:临床结果与服务活动数据分析
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Jan 24;24(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01622-0.
3
Factors Influencing the Quality of Life (QOL) of Advanced Cancer Patients in Home-based Palliative Care (HBPC): A Systematic Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring the meaning of dignity at end of life for Chinese Canadians caregivers: A qualitative cross-cultural study.探索加拿大华裔临终关怀照顾者尊严的意义:一项定性的跨文化研究。
Palliat Med. 2021 Jan;35(1):142-150. doi: 10.1177/0269216320956809. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
2
Adult palliative care 2004-2030 population study: estimates and projections in Malaysia.2004-2030 年马来西亚成人姑息治疗人口研究:估计数和预测。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2022 May;12(e1):e129-e136. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002283. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
3
What Variables Contribute to the Achievement of a Preferred Home Death for Cancer Patients in Receipt of Home-Based Palliative Care in Canada?
影响居家姑息治疗中晚期癌症患者生活质量(QOL)的因素:系统评价。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2024 Nov 1;25(11):3789-3797. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.11.3789.
4
Influencing factors of home hospice care needs of family caregivers of the older adult with chronic diseases at the end of life in China: a cross-sectional study.中国终末期慢性病老年患者家庭照护者居家 Hospice 照护需求的影响因素:一项横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 May 2;12:1348285. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1348285. eCollection 2024.
5
Trends and determinants of place of death among Chinese lymphoma patients: a population-based study from 2013-2021.中国淋巴瘤患者死亡地点的趋势及决定因素:一项基于2013 - 2021年人口的研究
Am J Cancer Res. 2023 Sep 15;13(9):4246-4258. eCollection 2023.
6
Preferred place of death and end-of-life care for adult cancer patients in Iran: A cross-sectional study.伊朗成年癌症患者的首选死亡地点及临终关怀:一项横断面研究。
Front Oncol. 2022 Aug 3;12:911397. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.911397. eCollection 2022.
哪些变量有助于在加拿大接受居家姑息治疗的癌症患者实现首选的居家死亡?
Cancer Nurs. 2021;44(3):214-222. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000863.
4
Morphine use for cancer pain: A strong analgesic used only at the end of life? A qualitative study on attitudes and perceptions of morphine in patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers.吗啡在癌痛治疗中的应用:生命末期才使用的强效镇痛药?一项对晚期癌症患者及其照护者对吗啡的态度和认知的定性研究。
Palliat Med. 2020 May;34(5):619-629. doi: 10.1177/0269216320904905. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
5
Expectation of the place of care and place of death of terminal cancer patients in Hong Kong: a hospital based cross-sectional questionnaire survey.香港晚期癌症患者对护理地点和死亡地点的期望:一项基于医院的横断面问卷调查
Ann Palliat Med. 2020 Nov;9(6):4534-4548. doi: 10.21037/apm.2019.09.17. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
6
Death at home: predictive factors in a medical home care unit.家中死亡:医疗居家护理单元中的预测因素。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2019 Sep 19. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-001932.
7
A brief, patient- and proxy-reported outcome measure in advanced illness: Validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS).一种简明的、针对晚期疾病患者及其代理人的结局测量工具:综合性姑息治疗结局量表(IPOS)的有效性、信度和反应度。
Palliat Med. 2019 Sep;33(8):1045-1057. doi: 10.1177/0269216319854264. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
8
Socioeconomic factors affecting access to preferred place of death: A qualitative evidence synthesis.影响选择死亡地点的社会经济因素:定性证据综合分析。
Palliat Med. 2019 Jun;33(6):607-617. doi: 10.1177/0269216319835146. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
9
Retrospective cohort analysis of real-life decisions about end-of-life care preferences in a Southeast Asian country.对东南亚一个国家临终关怀偏好的现实生活决策进行回顾性队列分析。
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 19;9(2):e024662. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024662.
10
A Prospective Cohort Study of Factors Associated With Place of Death Among Patients With Late-Stage Cancer in Southern Africa.一项在南非开展的与晚期癌症患者死亡地点相关因素的前瞻性队列研究。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 May;57(5):923-932. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.01.014. Epub 2019 Jan 30.