• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

失语症患者分享了他们对自我管理的看法,以及技术在支持失语症自我管理方面的作用。

People with aphasia share their views on self-management and the role of technology to support self-management of aphasia.

机构信息

Queensland Aphasia Research Centre, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Dec;44(24):7399-7412. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1989501. Epub 2021 Oct 17.

DOI:10.1080/09638288.2021.1989501
PMID:34657536
Abstract

PURPOSE

Self-management can lead to increased self-efficacy and improved quality of life for individuals with chronic conditions; however, there is little research exploring how self-management approaches can be used for chronic communication disorders, such as aphasia. Modifications to self-management approaches would be required to accommodate for aphasia; therefore, the input of people with aphasia (PwA) should be sought. The aims of the present study were: (1) To investigate and document the experiences and perspectives of PwA regarding self-management; (2) To explore how technology can be used to support aphasia self-management.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 26 PwA living in Australia. Qualitative content analysis was used to analyse interview data.

RESULTS

Analysis resulted in six themes: (1) In self-management, PwA take control of life with aphasia and assume responsibility for engaging in opportunities to improve overall communication; (2) Community aphasia groups are important enablers of self-management because they facilitate peer support; (3) Communication partners (CPs) provide multifaceted support in aphasia self-management; (4) SLPs provide integrated support and coordination in aphasia self-management; (5) Technology supports PwA to self-manage speech therapy and communication in daily life; (6) Psychological and physical health issues and societal factors may impact aphasia self-management abilities.

CONCLUSION

From the perspective of PwA, aphasia self-management involves enhancing skills enabling communication and life participation. PwA are central to aphasia self-management, with support provided by CPs, peers, and SLPs. Technology has a range of applications in aphasia self-management. PwA identified potential personal and contextual barriers that may impact self-management.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONFor people with aphasia, engaging in conversation and social interaction are primary means of managing/improving communicative life participation; therefore, this should be a key focus of aphasia self-management programs.Aphasia self-management approaches should maximise the use of available support and provide tailored information, education, and training in the area of self-management to key stakeholders (people with aphasia, communication partners, and speech-language pathologists).People with aphasia should be supported to use technology for aphasia self-management, encompassing communication specific and daily life use.People with aphasia should be heavily involved in the development of structured aphasia self-management approaches.

摘要

目的

自我管理可以提高慢性病患者的自我效能感和生活质量;然而,对于慢性交流障碍(如失语症),很少有研究探索如何使用自我管理方法。需要对自我管理方法进行修改以适应失语症;因此,应该征求失语症患者(PwA)的意见。本研究的目的是:(1)调查和记录 PwA 对自我管理的经验和看法;(2)探讨如何使用技术来支持失语症自我管理。

材料和方法

对 26 名居住在澳大利亚的 PwA 进行了深入的半结构化访谈。采用定性内容分析方法对访谈数据进行分析。

结果

分析产生了六个主题:(1)在自我管理中,PwA 控制着失语症的生活,并承担起参与改善整体沟通的机会的责任;(2)社区失语症小组是自我管理的重要推动者,因为它们促进了同伴支持;(3)沟通伙伴(CP)在失语症自我管理中提供多方面的支持;(4)言语治疗师在失语症自我管理中提供综合支持和协调;(5)技术支持 PwA 在日常生活中自我管理言语治疗和沟通;(6)心理和身体健康问题以及社会因素可能会影响失语症自我管理能力。

结论

从 PwA 的角度来看,失语症自我管理涉及增强沟通和生活参与的技能。PwA 是失语症自我管理的核心,得到 CP、同伴和言语治疗师的支持。技术在失语症自我管理中有多种应用。PwA 确定了可能影响自我管理的个人和背景障碍。

对康复的影响

对于失语症患者来说,进行对话和社交互动是管理/改善交流生活参与的主要手段;因此,这应该是失语症自我管理计划的重点。

失语症自我管理方法应最大限度地利用现有支持,并为关键利益相关者(失语症患者、沟通伙伴和言语治疗师)提供自我管理领域的定制信息、教育和培训。

应支持失语症患者使用技术进行失语症自我管理,包括沟通特定用途和日常生活用途。

失语症患者应广泛参与制定结构化的失语症自我管理方法。

相似文献

1
People with aphasia share their views on self-management and the role of technology to support self-management of aphasia.失语症患者分享了他们对自我管理的看法,以及技术在支持失语症自我管理方面的作用。
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Dec;44(24):7399-7412. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1989501. Epub 2021 Oct 17.
2
Communication partner perspectives of aphasia self-management and the role of technology: an in-depth qualitative exploration.沟通伙伴视角下的失语症自我管理及技术的作用:一项深入的定性探索。
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Nov;44(23):7199-7216. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1988153. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
3
"There are endless areas that they can use it for": speech-language pathologist perspectives of technology support for aphasia self-management.“他们可以在无数领域使用它”:言语语言病理学家对失语症自我管理的技术支持的观点。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2023 Nov;18(8):1473-1488. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2022.2037758. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
4
"Self-management has to be the way of the future": Exploring the perspectives of speech-language pathologists who work with people with aphasia.“自我管理必须成为未来的趋势”:探索言语病理学家在与失语症患者合作时的观点。
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2023 Apr;25(2):327-341. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2022.2055144. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
5
Communication strategies to support decision-making by persons with aphasia: A scoping review.支持失语症患者决策的沟通策略:范围综述。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2023 Nov-Dec;58(6):1955-1976. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12925. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
6
'I've got to get something out of it. And so do they': experiences of people with aphasia and university students participating in a communication partner training programme for healthcare professionals.“我得从中有所收获。他们也一样”:失语症患者和大学生参与医疗保健专业人员沟通伙伴培训项目的经历
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2018 Sep;53(5):919-928. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12402. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
7
Regulating emotional responses to aphasia to re-engage in life: a qualitative interview study.调节对失语症的情绪反应以重新投入生活:一项定性访谈研究。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2022 Mar;57(2):352-365. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12702. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
8
A study on the reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Scenario Test for people with chronic stroke-induced aphasia: A cross-sectional study.一项关于慢性脑卒中性失语症患者情景测试日语版的信度和效度的研究:一项横断面研究。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 Sep-Oct;59(5):1878-1892. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.13040. Epub 2024 May 1.
9
The confidence of speech-language pathology students regarding communicating with people with aphasia.言语病理学专业学生与失语症患者交流的信心。
BMC Med Educ. 2013 Jun 27;13:92. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-92.
10
Validating the Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB) for use with people with aphasia: an analysis of Differential Item Function (DIF).验证失语症患者使用的沟通参与项目库(CPIB):差异项目功能(DIF)分析。
Aphasiology. 2017;31(8):861-878. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2016.1225274. Epub 2016 Sep 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Treatment of aphasia in linguistically diverse populations: current and future directions.语言多样化人群失语症的治疗:现状与未来方向。
Front Psychol. 2025 Aug 14;16:1612413. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1612413. eCollection 2025.
2
Bridging the digital divide for people with aphasia: a study protocol for codesigning web accessibility tools and guidelines.弥合失语症患者的数字鸿沟:一项关于共同设计网络可及性工具和指南的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 10;15(8):e099273. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099273.
3
How accessible are the websites of health services for people who have had a stroke?
中风患者获取医疗服务网站的途径如何?
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Apr 24;24(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02459-6.
4
Creating opportunities to communicate and connect in a global pandemic: Exploring the experiences of people with aphasia of an online conversation partner scheme.在全球大流行期间创造交流与联系的机会:探索失语症患者参与在线对话伙伴计划的经历。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 May-Jun;60(3):e70027. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.70027.
5
Priorities for post-stroke aphasia service development: Prioritisation phase of an experience-based co-design study.中风后失语症服务发展的优先事项:基于经验的协同设计研究的优先级确定阶段
Clin Rehabil. 2025 Mar;39(3):353-365. doi: 10.1177/02692155241310579. Epub 2025 Feb 18.
6
The Adaptation of the Communicative Effectiveness Index (CETI) into Greek: A Reliability and Validity Study.《沟通有效性指数(CETI)的希腊语改编:一项信效度研究》
Brain Sci. 2024 Jul 10;14(7):689. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14070689.
7
Understanding experiences, unmet needs and priorities related to post-stroke aphasia care: stage one of an experience-based co-design project.理解与卒中后失语症护理相关的体验、未满足的需求和重点:基于体验的共同设计项目的第一阶段。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 20;14(5):e081680. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081680.
8
Research hotspots and frontiers of post-stroke aphasia rehabilitation: a bibliometric study and visualization analysis.脑卒中后失语症康复的研究热点与前沿:一项文献计量学研究与可视化分析
Front Hum Neurosci. 2023 May 11;17:1176923. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1176923. eCollection 2023.
9
Motivation as a Predictor of Aphasia Treatment Outcomes: A Scoping Review.动机作为失语症治疗结果的预测指标:一项范围综述
Top Lang Disord. 2022 Jul;43(3):252-265. doi: 10.1097/TLD.0000000000000286.