School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
BMC Med Educ. 2013 Jun 27;13:92. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-92.
Aphasia is an acquired language disorder that can present a significant barrier to patient involvement in healthcare decisions. Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) are viewed as experts in the field of communication. However, many SLP students do not receive practical training in techniques to communicate with people with aphasia (PWA) until they encounter PWA during clinical education placements.
This study investigated the confidence and knowledge of SLP students in communicating with PWA prior to clinical placements using a customised questionnaire. Confidence in communicating with people with aphasia was assessed using a 100-point visual analogue scale. Linear, and logistic, regressions were used to examine the association between confidence and age, as well as confidence and course type (graduate-entry masters or undergraduate), respectively. Knowledge of strategies to assist communication with PWA was examined by asking respondents to list specific strategies that could assist communication with PWA.
SLP students were not confident with the prospect of communicating with PWA; reporting a median 29-points (inter-quartile range 17-47) on the visual analogue confidence scale. Only, four (8.2%) of respondents rated their confidence greater than 55 (out of 100). Regression analyses indicated no relationship existed between confidence and students' age (p = 0.31, r-squared = 0.02), or confidence and course type (p = 0.22, pseudo r-squared = 0.03). Students displayed limited knowledge about communication strategies. Thematic analysis of strategies revealed four overarching themes; Physical, Verbal Communication, Visual Information and Environmental Changes. While most students identified potential use of resources (such as images and written information), fewer students identified strategies to alter their verbal communication (such as reduced speech rate).
SLP students who had received aphasia related theoretical coursework, but not commenced clinical placements with PWA, were not confident in their ability to communicate with PWA. Students may benefit from an educational intervention or curriculum modification to incorporate practical training in effective strategies to communicate with PWA, before they encounter PWA in clinical settings. Ensuring students have confidence and knowledge of potential communication strategies to assist communication with PWA may allow them to focus their learning experiences in more specific clinical domains, such as clinical reasoning, rather than building foundation interpersonal communication skills.
失语症是一种后天获得的语言障碍,会严重影响患者参与医疗决策的能力。言语语言病理学家(SLP)被视为沟通领域的专家。然而,许多 SLP 学生直到在临床教育实习中遇到失语症患者(PWA)时,才接受有关与 PWA 沟通的实用培训。
本研究使用定制问卷调查了 SLP 学生在临床实习前与 PWA 沟通的信心和知识。使用 100 分视觉模拟量表评估与 PWA 沟通的信心。线性和逻辑回归分别用于检查信心与年龄以及信心与课程类型(研究生入学硕士或本科)之间的关联。通过要求受访者列出有助于与 PWA 沟通的具体策略,来检查他们对协助与 PWA 沟通的策略的了解。
SLP 学生对与 PWA 沟通的前景没有信心;在视觉模拟量表的信心得分中,中位数为 29 分(四分位距 17-47)。只有 4 名(8.2%)受访者的评分大于 55 分(满分 100 分)。回归分析表明,信心与学生的年龄(p = 0.31,r-squared = 0.02)或信心与课程类型(p = 0.22,伪 r-squared = 0.03)之间不存在关系。学生对沟通策略的了解有限。对策略的主题分析揭示了四个总体主题;身体、言语沟通、视觉信息和环境变化。虽然大多数学生都能识别潜在的资源使用(如图片和书面信息),但较少的学生能识别改变言语沟通的策略(如降低语速)。
接受过失语症相关理论课程但尚未与 PWA 一起进行临床实习的 SLP 学生对自己与 PWA 沟通的能力没有信心。在学生在临床环境中遇到 PWA 之前,他们可能会受益于教育干预或课程修改,以纳入与 PWA 有效沟通的实用培训。确保学生对潜在沟通策略有信心和了解,以协助与 PWA 沟通,可能使他们能够将学习经验集中在更具体的临床领域,如临床推理,而不是建立基础的人际沟通技巧。