Suppr超能文献

用于评估不同圆锥位置圆锥角膜中角膜交联效果的ABCD分级系统。

The ABCD grading system in assessment of corneal cross-linking effect in keratoconus with different cone locations.

作者信息

Krolo Iva, Kasumović Aida, Matoc Ines, Sabol Ivan, Radman Ivana, Ratković Mirko

机构信息

University Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Center Sestre milosrdnice, Vinogradska cesta 29, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia.

University Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Center Sestre milosrdnice, Vinogradska cesta 29, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia.

出版信息

J Optom. 2023 Jan-Mar;16(1):74-80. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2021.09.002. Epub 2021 Oct 15.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to analyse the postoperative corneal cross-linking results of corneal parameters and the ABCD grading system, depending on the cone location.

METHODS

Thirty eyes of 25 patients with keratoconus (KC), who received the corneal cross-linking (CXL) treatment, were included in this study. The exclusion criteria were: patients under 18 years of age, corneal pachymetry less than 400 μm, corneal scarring, history of ocular trauma, history of ocular surgery, and corneal pathology other than KC. Patients were examined at the baseline visit, and followed-up at three, six, and twelve months after the CXL. All patients underwent visual acuity and Scheimpflug tomography at all visits. Progression parameters, keratometries, and ABCD grading were compared between the visits. Patients were classified into two groups: central and paracentral cones group (within the central 5 mm corneal zone) and peripheral cones group (outside the central 5 mm corneal zone), based on X-Y coordinates of maximal keratometry (Kmax).

RESULTS

Parameter A remained relatively stable throughout the follow-up period in both groups. Parameter B and parameter C showed a significant increase in both groups postoperatively. Parameter D showed stability at the 6-month post-CXL visit in the peripheral KC group, while the central and paracentral KC group showed improvement at the 12-month post-CXL visit.

CONCLUSION

There was no significant difference in the postoperative response between different cone locations in the ABCD grading system, when classifying according to the Kmax, except an earlier recovery of the parameter D in peripherally located cones.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在根据圆锥角膜的位置,分析角膜交联术后角膜参数及ABCD分级系统的结果。

方法

本研究纳入了25例接受角膜交联(CXL)治疗的圆锥角膜(KC)患者的30只眼。排除标准为:年龄小于18岁、角膜厚度小于400μm、角膜瘢痕、眼外伤史、眼部手术史以及除KC以外的角膜病变。患者在基线检查时进行检查,并在CXL术后3个月、6个月和12个月进行随访。所有患者在每次就诊时均进行视力检查和眼前节光学相干断层扫描。比较各次就诊之间的进展参数、角膜曲率测量值和ABCD分级。根据最大角膜曲率(Kmax)的X-Y坐标,将患者分为两组:中央和旁中央圆锥角膜组(在中央5mm角膜区域内)和周边圆锥角膜组(在中央5mm角膜区域外)。

结果

两组在整个随访期间参数A均保持相对稳定。参数B和参数C在两组术后均显著增加。参数D在周边KC组CXL术后6个月时保持稳定,而中央和旁中央KC组在CXL术后12个月时有所改善。

结论

在根据Kmax进行分类时,ABCD分级系统中不同圆锥角膜位置的术后反应无显著差异,只是周边圆锥角膜的参数D恢复较早。

相似文献

1
The ABCD grading system in assessment of corneal cross-linking effect in keratoconus with different cone locations.
J Optom. 2023 Jan-Mar;16(1):74-80. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2021.09.002. Epub 2021 Oct 15.
3
Prospective, randomized contralateral eye study of accelerated and conventional corneal cross-linking in pediatric keratoconus.
Int Ophthalmol. 2019 May;39(5):971-979. doi: 10.1007/s10792-018-0898-y. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
5
Analysis of pseudoprogression after corneal cross-linking in children with progressive keratoconus.
Acta Ophthalmol. 2016 Nov;94(7):e592-e599. doi: 10.1111/aos.13060. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
6
Clinical Results of Repeated Corneal Collagen Cross-linking in Progressive Keratoconus.
Cornea. 2020 Jan;39(1):84-87. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002128.
7
Customised Peripheral Corneal Cross-linking (P-CXL) for Ultra-thin Corneas with Stage III and IV Keratoconus.
Semin Ophthalmol. 2023 Oct;38(7):630-637. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2023.2179407. Epub 2023 Mar 7.
8
Central versus paracentral cone location and outcomes of accelerated cross-linking in keratoconus patients.
Eye (Lond). 2021 Dec;35(12):3311-3317. doi: 10.1038/s41433-021-01404-5. Epub 2021 Jan 29.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Progression Analysis with ABCD Grading System following Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking in Keratoconus.
Beyoglu Eye J. 2019 Oct 14;4(3):156-162. doi: 10.14744/bej.2019.49469. eCollection 2019.
2
The Role of Corneal Biomechanics for the Evaluation of Ectasia Patients.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 23;17(6):2113. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17062113.
3
Correlation Between Corneal Biomechanical Indices and the Severity of Keratoconus.
Cornea. 2020 Feb;39(2):215-221. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002129.
4
Two-year changes in corneal stiffness parameters after accelerated corneal cross-linking.
J Biomech. 2019 Aug 27;93:209-212. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.06.011. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
5
Impact of classifying keratoconus location based on keratometry or pachymetry on progression parameters.
Clin Exp Optom. 2020 May;103(3):312-319. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12927. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
6
A Review of Structural and Biomechanical Changes in the Cornea in Aging, Disease, and Photochemical Crosslinking.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2019 Mar 29;7:66. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00066. eCollection 2019.
7
Updates on corneal collagen cross-linking: Indications, techniques and clinical outcomes.
J Curr Ophthalmol. 2017 Sep 12;29(4):235-247. doi: 10.1016/j.joco.2017.07.003. eCollection 2017 Dec.
8
In Vivo Early Corneal Biomechanical Changes After Corneal Cross-linking in Patients With Progressive Keratoconus.
J Refract Surg. 2017 Dec 1;33(12):840-846. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20170922-02.
9
Keratoconus Screening Indices and Their Diagnostic Ability to Distinguish Normal From Ectatic Corneas.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2017 Sep;181:140-148. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2017.06.031. Epub 2017 Jul 4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验