Transition Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Spina Bifida Transition Clinic, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2021;14(4):631-641. doi: 10.3233/PRM-200758.
To determine characteristics associated with self-management independence and quality of life (QOL) among adolescents and young adults with spina bifida (AYASB) engaged in a spina bifida (SB) health care transition clinic.
During SB transition visits, Eighty-eight AYASB ages 14-20 completed the Adolescent/Young Adult Self-management and Independence Scale II Self-Report/SB (AMIS II-SR/SB), scores ranging from 1-7 with 7 indicating full independence in activities, and the QUAlity of Life Assessment in Spina bifida for Teens (QUALAS-T), which has two subscales, family/independence (QFI) and bowel/bladder (QBB), with scores ranging from 0-100 with 100 indicating maximal QOL score. Demographic and clinical variables were collected from the electronic medical record.
The baseline AMIS II-SR/SB score was 3.3 (SD 1.0). Baseline scores for QUALAS-T QFI and QBB subscales were 73.8 (SD 19.9) and 63.8 (SD 25.8). Older age was associated with a higher baseline AMIS II-SR/SB score (p = 0.017). Over time, AMIS II-SR/SB total significantly improved (p < 0.001), but QFI and QBB did not. AYASB not on chronic intermittent catheterization (CIC) and those using urethral CIC significantly improved in AMIS II-SR/SB total scores (p = 0.001), but those using abdominal channel CIC did not.
Baseline bladder management method was associated with self-management improvement for AYASB engaged in a SB-specific transition clinic.
确定在参与脊髓裂健康护理过渡诊所的青少年和年轻成人(AYASB)中,与自我管理独立性和生活质量(QOL)相关的特征。
在脊髓裂过渡访问期间,88 名年龄在 14-20 岁的 AYASB 完成了青少年/年轻成人自我管理和独立性量表 II 自我报告/脊髓裂(AMIS II-SR/SB),得分范围为 1-7,7 表示在活动中完全独立,以及青少年脊髓裂生活质量评估(QUALAS-T),它有两个子量表,家庭/独立性(QFI)和肠/膀胱(QBB),得分范围为 0-100,100 表示最大 QOL 得分。从电子病历中收集人口统计学和临床变量。
基线 AMIS II-SR/SB 评分为 3.3(SD 1.0)。QUALAS-T QFI 和 QBB 子量表的基线评分分别为 73.8(SD 19.9)和 63.8(SD 25.8)。年龄较大与基线 AMIS II-SR/SB 评分较高相关(p=0.017)。随着时间的推移,AMIS II-SR/SB 总分显著改善(p<0.001),但 QFI 和 QBB 没有。未接受慢性间歇性导尿(CIC)和使用尿道 CIC 的 AYASB 在 AMIS II-SR/SB 总分方面显著改善(p=0.001),但使用腹部通道 CIC 的 AYASB 没有。
参与脊髓裂特定过渡诊所的 AYASB 的基线膀胱管理方法与自我管理改善相关。