Department of Hepatic Surgery II, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Department of Colorectal Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Cancer Med. 2021 Dec;10(23):8507-8517. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4361. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
To explore the differences between prolonged continuous Pringle maneuver (CPM) and prolonged intermittent Pringle maneuver (IPM) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), who underwent complex hepatectomy.
This retrospective cohort study performed between June 2014 and May 2016 included 142 patients who underwent complex hepatectomy for HCC and concomitant chronic liver disease but with good liver function. Patients were categorized into CPM (n = 69) and IPM groups (n = 73). The differences in these aspects were compared between the two groups which include operation time, intraoperative bleeding, perioperative transfusion, postoperative complications, liver function injury, postoperative overall survival (OS), and tumor recurrence.
The cumulative clamping time, operation time, intraoperative bleeding, and perioperative transfusion rates were 38.0, 132 min, 300 ml, and 17.4% in CPM and 40.0, 145 min, 400 ml, and 32.9% in IPM, respectively. There were significant intergroup differences in operation time (p = 0.018), intraoperative bleeding (p < 0.001), and perioperative transfusion rates (p = 0.034). Besides, the postoperative complications and postoperative liver function injury of the CPM group were better than those of IPM. There was no significant intergroup difference in OS (p = 0.908) and tumor recurrence (p = 0.671) between two groups.
Compared with IPM, CPM with a cumulative clamping time between 30 and 50 min can shorten operation time, reduce intraoperative bleeding and perioperative transfusion, and reduce postoperative complications and postoperative liver function injury in patients who underwent complex hepatectomy for HCC and concomitant liver disease but with good liver function. There was no significant difference in OS and tumor recurrence between two groups.
探讨在接受复杂肝切除术治疗合并慢性肝病但肝功能良好的肝细胞癌(HCC)患者中,长时间连续阻断(CPM)与长时间间断阻断(IPM)之间的差异。
本回顾性队列研究于 2014 年 6 月至 2016 年 5 月进行,纳入 142 例接受复杂肝切除术治疗 HCC 合并慢性肝病但肝功能良好的患者。患者分为 CPM(n=69)和 IPM 组(n=73)。比较两组之间的手术时间、术中出血量、围手术期输血、术后并发症、肝功能损伤、术后总生存期(OS)和肿瘤复发的差异。
CPM 组累积阻断时间、手术时间、术中出血量和围手术期输血率分别为 38.0、132 分钟、300ml 和 17.4%,IPM 组分别为 40.0、145 分钟、400ml 和 32.9%。CPM 组的手术时间(p=0.018)、术中出血量(p<0.001)和围手术期输血率(p=0.034)明显高于 IPM 组。此外,CPM 组的术后并发症和术后肝功能损伤均优于 IPM 组。两组之间 OS(p=0.908)和肿瘤复发(p=0.671)无显著差异。
与 IPM 相比,CPM 累积阻断时间为 30-50 分钟可缩短手术时间,减少术中出血量和围手术期输血,降低术后并发症和术后肝功能损伤,适用于接受复杂肝切除术治疗合并慢性肝病但肝功能良好的 HCC 患者。两组之间 OS 和肿瘤复发无显著差异。