Canfield Matthew C, Duncan Jessica, Claeys Priscilla
Van Vollenhoven Institute, Leiden Law School, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Rural Sociology Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Development (Rome). 2021;64(3-4):181-191. doi: 10.1057/s41301-021-00312-1. Epub 2021 Oct 13.
The UN Food Systems Summit was an ambitious and hotly contested event that brought competing approaches to global food governance into relief. In this article, we unpack the rival visions that circulate around how food systems should be governed, focusing on two issues that we feel are at the heart of these divergences: authority and legitimacy. We illustrate how both corporate-philanthropic and food sovereignty networks are struggling to establish epistemic authority of food systems as well as produce legitimacy through very different approaches to participation and accountability.
联合国粮食系统峰会是一项雄心勃勃且备受争议的活动，它使全球粮食治理的相互竞争的方法凸显出来。在本文中，我们剖析了围绕粮食系统应如何治理流传的相互对立的愿景，重点关注我们认为是这些分歧核心的两个问题：权威性和合法性。我们阐述了企业慈善网络和粮食主权网络如何都在努力通过截然不同的参与和问责方法来确立粮食系统的认知权威并产生合法性。
