Zhang Betty, Niroopan Gavinn, Gohal Chetan, Alolabi Bashar, Leroux Timothy, Khan Moin
DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Shoulder Elbow. 2021 Oct;13(5):509-517. doi: 10.1177/1758573220917653. Epub 2020 Apr 19.
Primary anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty can be challenging in patients with complex glenoid wear patterns and bone loss. Severe retroversion (>15°) or significant bone loss may require bone grafting. This review summarizes the rate of revision and long-term outcomes of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty with bone graft.
A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, and CENTRAL databases was conducted from the date of inception to 23 October 2018. Two reviewers independently screened articles for eligibility and extracted data for analysis. The primary outcome was rate of revision. The secondary outcomes were rate of component loosening, functional outcome, and range of motion.
Of the 1056 articles identified in the search, 26 underwent full-text screening and 7 articles were included in the analysis. All procedures were one-stage anatomic total shoulder arthroplasties. The rate of revision was 5.4% with component loosening and infection listed as indications over a weighted mean follow-up period of 6.3 years. Complications occurred in 12.6% of patients.
Glenoid bone grafting in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty results in comparable revision rates and improvement in pain compared to augmented glenoid components and reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Due to the low quality of evidence, further prospective studies should be conducted.
IV.
对于存在复杂肩胛盂磨损模式和骨质流失的患者,初次解剖型全肩关节置换术可能具有挑战性。严重的后倾(>15°)或明显的骨质流失可能需要植骨。本综述总结了采用植骨的解剖型全肩关节置换术的翻修率和长期疗效。
从数据库创建之日至2018年10月23日,对MEDLINE、Embase、PubMed和CENTRAL数据库进行了系统检索。两名 reviewers 独立筛选文章以确定其是否符合纳入标准,并提取数据进行分析。主要结局指标是翻修率。次要结局指标是假体松动率、功能结局和活动范围。
在检索到的1056篇文章中,26篇进行了全文筛选,7篇纳入分析。所有手术均为一期解剖型全肩关节置换术。在加权平均随访6.3年期间,翻修率为5.4%,翻修指征包括假体松动和感染。12.6%的患者发生了并发症。
与增强型肩胛盂假体和反式肩关节置换术相比,解剖型全肩关节置换术中进行肩胛盂植骨的翻修率相当,疼痛有所改善。由于证据质量低,应开展进一步的前瞻性研究。
IV级。