Lenart Brett A, Namdari Surena, Williams Gerald R
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Metropolitan Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Mar;25(3):398-405. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.08.012. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
Glenoid bone loss is a challenging problem when performing total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Posterior glenoid bone deficiency is more common than anterior deficiency, and so the literature on methods to treat anterior glenoid deficiency in the setting of TSA is not common. The purpose of this case series was to describe preoperative factors, surgical technique, and clinical outcomes in select patients who underwent placement of an anteriorly augmented glenoid component during TSA.
This was a retrospective case series of 5 patients who underwent TSA with an anteriorly augmented component. The medical records were reviewed, including preoperative demographics, clinical examination, radiographs, Penn Shoulder Score and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score.
Preoperative diagnoses were anterior glenoid erosion in 2 patients, and 1 patient each with malunited glenoid fracture, nonunited glenoid fracture, and post-traumatic arthritis. The mean age at the time of surgery was 67.4 years (range, 53-75 years). No patient demonstrated radiographic or clinical signs of glenoid component loosening at final follow-up. Postoperative Penn Shoulder Scores averaged 84.4 points (range, 58-100 points), and postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores averaged 88.0 points (range, 68-100 points). Average postoperative active forward elevation was 140° (range, 80°-170°), and active external rotation was 29° (range 10°-45°). There were no dislocations or revision surgeries at an average of 33.2 months (range, 21.9-43.2 months) after surgery.
In the short term, glenohumeral arthrosis in the setting of anterior glenoid deficiency can be treated with an anteriorly augmented glenoid component. Further follow-up and a larger series of patients are necessary to determine the long-term outcomes and complications associated with this technique.
在进行全肩关节置换术(TSA)时,肩胛盂骨丢失是一个具有挑战性的问题。肩胛盂后方骨缺损比前方缺损更常见,因此关于在TSA背景下治疗肩胛盂前方缺损方法的文献并不常见。本病例系列的目的是描述在TSA期间接受前方增强型肩胛盂假体植入的特定患者的术前因素、手术技术和临床结果。
这是一项对5例行TSA并植入前方增强型假体的患者的回顾性病例系列研究。回顾了病历,包括术前人口统计学资料、临床检查、X线片、宾夕法尼亚肩关节评分和美国肩肘外科医生评分。
术前诊断为2例肩胛盂前方侵蚀,1例肩胛盂骨折畸形愈合,1例肩胛盂骨折不愈合,1例创伤后关节炎。手术时的平均年龄为67.4岁(范围53 - 75岁)。在最后随访时,没有患者出现肩胛盂假体松动的影像学或临床体征。术后宾夕法尼亚肩关节评分平均为84.4分(范围58 - 100分),术后美国肩肘外科医生评分平均为88.0分(范围68 - 100分)。术后平均主动前屈上举角度为140°(范围80° - 170°),主动外旋角度为29°(范围10° - 45°)。术后平均33.2个月(范围21.9 - 43.2个月)无脱位或翻修手术。
短期内,肩胛盂前方缺损情况下的盂肱关节病可用前方增强型肩胛盂假体治疗。需要进一步随访和更大规模的患者系列研究来确定该技术的长期结果和并发症。