Chattopadhyay Samir, Mukherjee Manjistha, Kandemir Banu, Bowman Sarah E J, Bren Kara L, Dey Abhishek
School of Chemical Sciences, Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science 2A Raja SC Mullick Road Kolkata WB 700032 India
Department of Chemistry, University of Rochester Rochester NY 14627-0216 USA
Chem Sci. 2021 Aug 6;12(35):11894-11913. doi: 10.1039/d1sc02865k. eCollection 2021 Sep 15.
Cytochromes are small water-soluble proteins that catalyze electron transfer in metabolism and energy conversion processes. cytochrome presents a curious case in displaying fluxionality of its heme axial methionine ligand; this behavior is altered by single point mutation of the Q64 residue to N64 or V64, which fixes the ligand in a single configuration. The reorganization energy () of these cytochrome variants is experimentally determined using a combination of rotating disc electrochemistry, chronoamperometry and cyclic voltammetry. The differences between the determined from these complementary techniques helps to deconvolute the contribution of the active site and its immediate environment to the overall ( ). The experimentally determined values in conjunction with DFT calculations indicate that the differences in among the protein variants are mainly due to the differences in contributions from the protein environment and not just inner-sphere . DFT calculations indicate that the position of residue 64, responsible for the orientation of the axial methionine, determines the geometric relaxation of the redox active molecular orbital (RAMO). The orientation of the RAMO with respect to the heme is key to determining electron transfer coupling ( ) which results in higher ET rates in the wild-type protein relative to the Q64V mutant despite a 150 mV higher in the former.
细胞色素是一类小的水溶性蛋白质,在新陈代谢和能量转换过程中催化电子转移。细胞色素在其血红素轴向甲硫氨酸配体的流动性方面呈现出一个奇特的例子;将Q64残基单点突变为N64或V64会改变这种行为,从而将配体固定在单一构型。这些细胞色素变体的重组能()通过旋转圆盘电化学、计时电流法和循环伏安法相结合的方式进行实验测定。这些互补技术所测定的之间的差异有助于剖析活性位点及其紧邻环境对整体()的贡献。实验测定的 值与密度泛函理论(DFT)计算结果表明,蛋白质变体之间的差异主要源于蛋白质环境贡献的不同,而不仅仅是内球层的差异。DFT计算表明,负责轴向甲硫氨酸取向的64位残基的位置决定了氧化还原活性分子轨道(RAMO)的几何弛豫。RAMO相对于血红素的取向是决定电子转移耦合()的关键,这导致野生型蛋白质中的电子转移速率高于Q64V突变体,尽管前者的更高150 mV。