Swansea Bay University Health Board, Singleton Hospital, Swansea, United Kingdom.
Institute of Life Science, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021 Sep 30;11:752275. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.752275. eCollection 2021.
To investigate whether women with overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms and no evidence of clinical infection by conventional clean-catch midstream urine cultures have alternative indicators of sub-clinical infection.
PATIENTS/SUBJECTS MATERIALS & METHODS: The study was a prospective, blinded case-control study with 147 participants recruited, including 73 OAB patients and 74 controls. The OAB group comprised female patients of at least 18 years of age who presented with OAB symptoms for more than 3 months. Clean-catch midstream urine samples were examined for pyuria by microscopy; subjected to routine and enhanced microbiological cultures and examined for the presence of 10 different cytokines, chemokines, and prostaglandins by ELISA.
The mean age and BMI of participants in both groups were similar. No significant difference in the number of women with pyuria was observed between OAB and control groups (p = 0.651). Routine laboratory cultures were positive in three (4%) of women in the OAB group, whereas the enhanced cultures isolated bacteria in 17 (23.2%) of the OAB patients. In the control group, no positive cultures were observed using routine laboratory cultures, whereas enhanced culture isolated bacteria in 8 (10.8%) patients. No significant differences were observed in the concentrations of PGE2, PGF2α, MCP-1, sCD40L, MIP-1β, IL12p70/p40, IL12/IL-23p40, IL-5, EGF and GRO-α between the OAB and control groups.
Patients with OAB symptoms have significant bacterial growth on enhanced culture of the urine, which is often not detectable through routine culture, suggesting a subclinical infection. Enhanced culture techniques should therefore be used routinely for the effective diagnosis and management of OAB.
研究是否有症状性膀胱过度活动症(OAB)且无临床感染证据的女性患者存在亚临床感染的替代指标。
患者/材料和方法:这是一项前瞻性、盲法病例对照研究,共纳入 147 名参与者,包括 73 名 OAB 患者和 74 名对照。OAB 组由年龄至少 18 岁且有 3 个月以上 OAB 症状的女性患者组成。用显微镜检查清洁中段尿样本中的脓尿;进行常规和增强微生物培养,并通过 ELISA 检查 10 种不同的细胞因子、趋化因子和前列腺素。
两组参与者的平均年龄和 BMI 相似。OAB 组和对照组中脓尿女性数量无显著差异(p = 0.651)。OAB 组有 3 名(4%)女性常规实验室培养阳性,而增强培养则分离出 17 名(23.2%)OAB 患者的细菌。在对照组中,常规实验室培养未分离出阳性细菌,而增强培养分离出 8 名(10.8%)患者的细菌。OAB 组和对照组之间 PGE2、PGF2α、MCP-1、sCD40L、MIP-1β、IL12p70/p40、IL12/IL-23p40、IL-5、EGF 和 GRO-α 的浓度无显著差异。
有 OAB 症状的患者尿液增强培养有显著细菌生长,而常规培养通常无法检测到,提示存在亚临床感染。因此,应常规使用增强培养技术来有效诊断和管理 OAB。