School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University and.
Department of Rheumatology, Monash Health, Clayton, Vic., Australia.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2022 Apr 11;61(4):1341-1353. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab777.
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in SLE (lupus) typically adopt composite responder definitions as primary efficacy endpoints; however, outcomes within individual organ domains are also important to understand. The aim of this scoping review was to evaluate how organ-specific disease activity and therapeutic responses have been measured and reported in lupus RCTs.
We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane registry and clinicaltrials.gov. Eligible studies were RCTs investigating efficacy of an immune-directed drug therapy in active SLE, published January 2000-March 2021, excluding studies limited to lupus nephritis. Data were extracted independently in duplicate into a template and summarized descriptively.
Thirty-four RCTs were included, of which 32 (94%) reported activity and/or responses in at least one organ domain. Study populations had a high, although variable, frequency of baseline musculoskeletal and mucocutaneous activity and low, but also variable, representation of other domains. Definitions of organ-specific responses were inconsistent, even within individual instruments. Response in most organ domains were evaluated using BILAG and SLEDAI components but meaningful comparison between treatment arms was limited by small subgroups analysed in a post hoc fashion. Specific mucocutaneous and arthritis instruments were also used, including within pre-specified organ-specific endpoints, which discriminated between treatment arms in some studies.
Mucocutaneous and musculoskeletal manifestations predominate in SLE RCTs. Organ-specific outcome measures are commonly reported, but definitions of involvement and response are inconsistent. Research into the development of new outcome measures for key organ domains, and validation and comparison of response definitions using existing instruments, is needed.
系统性红斑狼疮(狼疮)的随机对照试验(RCT)通常采用复合应答定义作为主要疗效终点;然而,了解各个器官领域的结局也很重要。本范围综述的目的是评估在狼疮 RCT 中,如何测量和报告器官特异性疾病活动度和治疗反应。
我们检索了 MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane 注册库和 clinicaltrials.gov。纳入的研究是 RCT,研究对象为活性系统性红斑狼疮患者,接受免疫靶向药物治疗,发表日期为 2000 年 1 月至 2021 年 3 月,不包括仅限于狼疮肾炎的研究。数据由两名独立人员使用模板重复提取,并进行描述性总结。
共纳入 34 项 RCT,其中 32 项(94%)至少报告了一个器官领域的活动度和/或应答情况。研究人群基线时肌肉骨骼和黏膜皮肤活动度高,但变异性大,其他器官的基线活动度低,但变异性也大。器官特异性应答的定义不一致,甚至在个别仪器内也是如此。大多数器官领域的应答使用 BILAG 和 SLEDAI 成分评估,但由于事后以亚组分析方式进行,治疗组之间的比较受到限制。还使用了特定的黏膜皮肤和关节炎仪器,包括在预先指定的器官特异性终点内,这些仪器在一些研究中区分了治疗组。
黏膜皮肤和肌肉骨骼表现是狼疮 RCT 的主要表现。常见报告器官特异性结局指标,但参与和应答的定义不一致。需要研究开发关键器官领域的新结局指标,并使用现有仪器验证和比较应答定义。