Suppr超能文献

不同形式鼻窦膜穿孔在侧开窗鼻窦提升术中的发生率、危险因素和修复机制:一项回顾性队列研究。

Prevalence, risk factors, and repair mechanism of different forms of sinus membrane perforations in lateral window sinus lift procedure: A retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medical (JKU) University, Linz, Austria.

Department of Prosthodontics, Sigmund Freud Private-University, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2021 Dec;23(6):821-832. doi: 10.1111/cid.13016. Epub 2021 Oct 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate prevalences, affecting risk factors and efforts for repair mechanism for different forms of sinus membrane perforations (SMP) during sinus floor elevation (SFE) using the lateral window technique (LWT).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

For 334/434 patients, SFE undergoing LWT prevalence of SMP was retrospectively evaluated including a subselection based on membrane perforation size (<10 mm: small-moderate/≥10 mm: large) and biotype (BT; thick BT/thin BT) into four subgroups (SMP1: thick BT/small-moderate; SMP2: thin BT/small-moderate; SMP3: thick BT/large; SMP4: thin BT/large). For the various subgroups, patient- and surgery-related/anatomic risk factors affecting SMP were evaluated and the scope of sinus membrane repair (SSMR) mechanisms rated with 1 (easy) to 5 (complex) was compared.

RESULTS

For 103/434 SMP (27.6%) in 93/334 patients (30.8%) the prevalence of various forms of SMP differed significantly (p < 0.001) among the four subgroups. SMP4 with a prevalence of 45.6% (n = 47) was the most frequent type, while SMP3 had low prevalence with 4.85% (n = 5). Small/moderate SMPs with thick (SMP1: n = 26) or thin BT (SMP2: n = 23) were seen in 26.2% and 23.3%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed significant differences between subgroups with large perforations (SMP3/SMP4) and those with small/moderate perforations (SMP1/SMP2) regarding anatomic risk factors such as residual ridge height (p = 0.023) and history of previous oral surgical interventions (OSI; p = 0.026). Most evidently, multivariate analysis showed that induction of large SMP with thin biotype (SMP4) was significantly affected by the presence of sinus septa (p < 0.022, OR: 2.415), reduced residual ridge height (p < 0.001, OR: 1.842), and previous OSI (p < 0.001, OR: 4.545). SSMR differed significantly (p < 0.001) between SMP4 (4.62 ± 0.49) and the subgroups SMP1 (1.11 ± 0.32), SMP2 (1.08 ± 028), and SMP3 (2.2 ± 0.55).

CONCLUSION

The most frequently found type of SMP had characteristics of thin biotype and large size associated with risk factors such as sinus septa, reduced residual ridge, and previous surgical interventions and required challenging repair mechanisms assessing clinical impact.

摘要

目的

使用外侧壁开窗术(LWT)评估鼻窦底提升(SFE)过程中不同类型鼻窦膜穿孔(SMP)的发生率、影响修复机制的风险因素。

材料与方法

对 334/434 例患者进行回顾性研究,评估 LWT 中 SMP 的发生率,包括基于膜穿孔大小(<10mm:小/中-≥10mm:大)和生物型(BT;厚 BT/薄 BT)的亚选择,将患者分为四个亚组(SMP1:厚 BT/小/中;SMP2:薄 BT/小/中;SMP3:厚 BT/大;SMP4:薄 BT/大)。对于各种亚组,评估了影响 SMP 的患者和手术相关/解剖风险因素,并比较了鼻窦膜修复(SSMR)机制的评分(1(简单)-5(复杂))。

结果

在 93/334 例(30.8%)患者的 103/434 例 SMP(27.6%)中,四种亚组之间 SMP 的各种类型存在显著差异(p<0.001)。发生率最高的是 SMP4,占 45.6%(n=47),而发生率最低的是 SMP3,占 4.85%(n=5)。厚 BT(SMP1:n=26)或薄 BT(SMP2:n=23)的小/中 SMP 分别占 26.2%和 23.3%。单因素分析显示,大穿孔亚组(SMP3/SMP4)与小/中穿孔亚组(SMP1/SMP2)之间在解剖风险因素方面存在显著差异,如残余牙槽嵴高度(p=0.023)和既往口腔手术干预史(OSI;p=0.026)。多因素分析显示,诱导薄 BT 大 SMP(SMP4)显著受鼻窦隔存在(p<0.022,OR:2.415)、残余牙槽嵴高度降低(p<0.001,OR:1.842)和既往 OSI(p<0.001,OR:4.545)的影响。SSMR 在 SMP4(4.62±0.49)和 SMP1(1.11±0.32)、SMP2(1.08±0.28)和 SMP3(2.2±0.55)亚组之间有显著差异(p<0.001)。

结论

最常见的 SMP 类型为薄 BT 且穿孔较大,与鼻窦隔、残余牙槽嵴高度降低以及既往手术干预等风险因素相关,需要采用有挑战性的修复机制,评估其临床影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验