Suppr超能文献

重组酶聚合酶扩增结合侧向流动试纸条读数法对秘鲁亚马逊雨林地区皮肤利什曼病患者的诊断效能

Diagnostic Efficacy of Recombinase-Polymerase-Amplification Coupled with Lateral Flow Strip Reading in Patients with Cutaneous Leishmaniasis from the Amazonas Rainforest of Perú.

作者信息

Travi Bruno L, Delos Santos Maxy B, Shelite Thomas R, Santos Rocio P, Rosales Luis A, Castellanos-Gonzalez Alejandro, Saldarriaga Omar, Melby Peter C

机构信息

Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA.

Center for Tropical Diseases, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA.

出版信息

Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2021 Dec;21(12):941-947. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2021.0038. Epub 2021 Oct 19.

Abstract

Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is highly prevalent in rural and sylvatic regions of Latin America, with an estimated 55,000 annual cases. Diagnosis in resource-limited areas still relies on microscopy of dermal scrapings, while more sensitive methods like PCR are not attainable due to costs and lack of adequate health infrastructure. Isothermal amplification of DNA can be performed without sophisticated equipment and training and may become a point of care (POC) test for health care centers with scarce resources. We evaluated the efficacy of recombinase-polymerase-amplification (RPA-LF) to diagnose CL in 226 patients attending a clinic in Puerto Maldonado within the Peruvian Amazon basin. Conventional PCR targeting kinetoplast DNA (kDNA-PCR) was used as the gold standard. Eight of 226 patients were considered true negatives (microscopy, kDNA-PCR, and RPA-LF negative), while RPA-LF resulted positive in 186 of 204 kDNA-PCR positive patients, yielding 91.2% (confidence interval [CI] = 86.5-94.4%) sensitivity and 93% (CI 88.6-95.8%) positive predictive value. There were 14% (32/226) discrepant samples alternating positive and negative results in similar proportions between both tests. Quantitative PCR used to resolve the discrepancies suggested that they occurred in samples with scarce parasite numbers as determined by high cycle threshold (Ct) values (≥32; cutoff 35.5). Microscopy had the lowest sensitivity of all methods (45.4%). Nested real-time PCR performed in 71 samples determined that () was highly prevalent (69/71), and () was present in only two isolates. Results indicated that RPA-LF has POC potential for CL endemic areas, yet further simplification and optimization coupled with field validation will be necessary to confirm its broad applicability.

摘要

皮肤利什曼病(CL)在拉丁美洲的农村和森林地区高度流行,估计每年有55000例病例。在资源有限的地区,诊断仍依赖于皮肤刮片显微镜检查,而由于成本和缺乏足够的卫生基础设施,像PCR这样更敏感的方法无法实现。DNA等温扩增无需复杂设备和培训即可进行,对于资源稀缺的医疗中心可能会成为一种即时检测(POC)方法。我们评估了重组酶聚合酶扩增(RPA-LF)在秘鲁亚马逊盆地马尔多纳多港一家诊所就诊的226例患者中诊断CL的效果。以靶向动基体DNA的常规PCR(kDNA-PCR)作为金标准。226例患者中有8例被视为真正的阴性(显微镜检查、kDNA-PCR和RPA-LF均为阴性),而在204例kDNA-PCR阳性患者中,RPA-LF有186例呈阳性,敏感性为91.2%(置信区间[CI]=86.5-94.4%),阳性预测值为93%(CI 88.6-95.8%)。有14%(32/226)的样本结果不一致,两种检测方法的阳性和阴性结果比例相似。用于解决差异的定量PCR表明,这些差异发生在寄生虫数量稀少的样本中,这由高循环阈值(Ct)值(≥32;临界值35.5)确定。显微镜检查是所有方法中敏感性最低的(45.4%)。对71个样本进行的巢式实时PCR检测确定,()高度流行(69/71),而()仅在两个分离株中存在。结果表明,RPA-LF在CL流行地区具有即时检测的潜力,但需要进一步简化和优化并结合现场验证,以确认其广泛适用性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验