School of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
Department of Economics, Cork University Business School, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 19;11(10):e051951. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051951.
Diabetic retinopathy screening (DRS) uptake is suboptimal in many countries with limited evidence available on interventions to enhance DRS uptake in primary care. We investigated the feasibility and preliminary effects of an intervention to improve uptake of Ireland's national DRS programme, Diabetic RetinaScreen, among patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes.
DESIGN/SETTING: We conducted a cluster randomised pilot trial, embedded process evaluation and cost analysis in general practice, July 2019 to January 2020.
Eight practices participated in the trial. For the process evaluation, surveys were conducted with 25 staff at intervention practices. Interviews were conducted with nine staff at intervention practices, and 10 patients who received the intervention.
The intervention comprised practice reimbursement, an audit of attendance, electronic prompts targeting professionals, General Practice-endorsed patient reminders and a patient information leaflet. Practices were randomly allocated to intervention (n=4) or wait-list control (n=4) (usual care).
Staff and patient interviews explored their perspectives on the intervention. Patient registration and attendance, including intention to attend, were measured at baseline and 6 months. Microcosting was used to estimate intervention delivery cost.
The process evaluation identified that enablers of feasibility included practice culture and capacity to protect time, systems to organise care, and staff skills, and workarounds to improve intervention 'fit'. At 6 months, 22/71 (31%) of baseline non-attenders in intervention practices subsequently attended screening compared with 15/87 (17%) in control practices. The total delivery cost across intervention practices (patients=363) was €2509, averaging €627 per practice and €6.91 per audited patient. Continuation criteria supported proceeding to a definitive trial.
The Improving Diabetes Eye screening Attendance intervention is feasible in primary care; however, consideration should be given to how best to facilitate local tailoring. A definitive trial of clinical and cost-effectiveness is required with preliminary results suggesting a positive effect on uptake.
NCT03901898.
在许多国家,糖尿病视网膜病变筛查(DRS)的参与率较低,而在初级保健中提高 DRS 参与率的干预措施的证据有限。我们调查了一种干预措施在提高爱尔兰国家 DRS 计划(糖尿病视网膜筛查)参与率方面的可行性和初步效果,该计划针对 1 型或 2 型糖尿病患者。
设计/设置:我们在 2019 年 7 月至 2020 年 1 月期间在全科医学中进行了一项集群随机试点试验、嵌入式过程评估和成本分析。
8 家诊所参加了该试验。对于过程评估,对干预实践中的 25 名工作人员进行了调查。对干预实践中的 9 名工作人员和 10 名接受干预的患者进行了访谈。
干预措施包括向诊所报销、对就诊情况进行审计、针对专业人员的电子提示、全科医生认可的患者提醒和患者信息传单。诊所被随机分配到干预组(n=4)或候补名单对照组(n=4)(常规护理)。
工作人员和患者访谈探讨了他们对干预措施的看法。在基线和 6 个月时测量了患者的注册和就诊情况,包括就诊意向。微成本用于估计干预措施的交付成本。
过程评估确定了可行性的促成因素包括实践文化和保护时间的能力、组织护理的系统、员工技能以及改善干预措施“适应性”的解决办法。在 6 个月时,干预实践中 22/71(31%)的基线未就诊者随后接受了筛查,而对照组中为 15/87(17%)。干预实践中(患者=363)的总交付成本为 2509 欧元,平均每个实践为 627 欧元,每个经审计的患者为 6.91 欧元。持续标准支持进行确定性试验。
改善糖尿病眼病筛查参与度的干预措施在初级保健中是可行的;然而,应考虑如何最好地促进本地定制。需要进行临床和成本效益的确定性试验,初步结果表明该干预措施对参与度有积极影响。
NCT03901898。