• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

了解患者对疝手术的认知:一项定量研究。

Understanding patient-reported knowledge of hernia surgery: a quantitative study.

机构信息

Geriatric Service, Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain.

Abdominal Wall Surgery Unit, Department of General Surgery, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Passeig Vall d'Hebron 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Hernia. 2022 Jun;26(3):761-768. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02521-6. Epub 2021 Oct 20.

DOI:10.1007/s10029-021-02521-6
PMID:34669079
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9200871/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to gather information on patient-reported knowledge (PRK) in the field of hernia surgery.

METHODS

A prospective quantitative study was designed to explore different aspects of PRK and opinions regarding hernia surgery. Patients referred for the first time to a surgical service with a presumed diagnosis of hernia and eventual hernia repair were eligible, and those who gave consent completed a simple self-assessment questionnaire before the clinical visit.

RESULTS

The study population included 449 patients (72.8% men, mean age 61.5). Twenty (4.5%) patients did not have hernia on physical examination. The patient's perceived health status was "neither bad nor good" or "good" in 56.6% of cases. Also, more patients considered that hernia repair would be an easy procedure (35.1%) rather than a difficult one (9.8%). Although patients were referred by their family physicians, 32 (7.1%) answered negatively to the question of coming to the visit to assess the presence of a hernia. The most important reason of the medical visit was to receive medical advice (77.7%), to be operated on as soon as possible (40.1%) or to be included in the surgical waiting list (35.9%). Also, 46.1% of the patients considered that they should undergo a hernia repair and 56.8% that surgery will be a definitive solution.

CONCLUSION

PRK of patients referred for the first time to an abdominal wall surgery unit with a presumed diagnosis of hernia was quite limited and there is still a long way towards improving knowledge of hernia surgery.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在收集疝外科领域患者报告知识(PRK)的信息。

方法

设计了一项前瞻性定量研究,以探讨 PRK 的不同方面以及对疝手术的看法。首次因疑似疝并最终接受疝修补术而被转诊至外科服务的患者符合条件,同意的患者在就诊前完成了一份简单的自我评估问卷。

结果

研究人群包括 449 名患者(72.8%为男性,平均年龄 61.5 岁)。20 名(4.5%)患者体格检查未发现疝。56.6%的患者自我感觉健康状况“不差也不好”或“良好”。此外,更多的患者认为疝修补术将是一个简单的手术(35.1%),而不是困难的手术(9.8%)。尽管患者是由家庭医生转诊的,但 32 名(7.1%)患者对来就诊评估是否存在疝的问题回答是否定的。就诊的最重要原因是寻求医疗建议(77.7%)、尽快接受手术(40.1%)或被纳入手术等候名单(35.9%)。此外,46.1%的患者认为他们应该接受疝修补术,56.8%的患者认为手术将是一个明确的解决方案。

结论

首次因疑似疝而被转诊至腹壁外科单位的患者的 PRK 相当有限,在提高对疝手术的认识方面还有很长的路要走。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b615/9200871/bf913941a5b1/10029_2021_2521_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b615/9200871/e0513f945940/10029_2021_2521_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b615/9200871/79794bd6963c/10029_2021_2521_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b615/9200871/3a16ffc59b01/10029_2021_2521_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b615/9200871/bf913941a5b1/10029_2021_2521_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b615/9200871/e0513f945940/10029_2021_2521_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b615/9200871/79794bd6963c/10029_2021_2521_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b615/9200871/3a16ffc59b01/10029_2021_2521_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b615/9200871/bf913941a5b1/10029_2021_2521_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Understanding patient-reported knowledge of hernia surgery: a quantitative study.了解患者对疝手术的认知:一项定量研究。
Hernia. 2022 Jun;26(3):761-768. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02521-6. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
2
Recovery after abdominal wall reconstruction.腹壁重建后的恢复
Dan Med J. 2017 Mar;64(3).
3
Single hospital visit day case laparoscopic hernia repair without prior outpatient consultation is safe and acceptable to patients.单次住院日间腹腔镜疝修补术,无需术前门诊咨询,对患者来说是安全且可接受的。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Dec;30(12):5565-5571. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4929-3. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
4
Interposition of the omentum and/or the peritoneum in the emergency repair of large ventral hernias with polypropylene mesh.网膜和/或腹膜在聚丙烯网片急诊修补大型腹壁疝中的应用。
Int J Surg. 2014;12(6):578-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.04.009. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
5
Patient-reported outcomes after incisional hernia repair.切口疝修补术后的患者报告结局。
Hernia. 2021 Dec;25(6):1677-1684. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02477-7. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
6
Waiting for surgery: is waiting bad for anyone or everyone?等待手术:等待对任何人或所有人都不利吗?
Hernia. 2017 Dec;21(6):933-940. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1684-x. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
7
Patient perceptions on mesh use in hernia repair: A prospective, questionnaire-based study.患者对疝修补术中使用网片的看法:一项前瞻性、基于问卷的研究。
Surgery. 2020 Apr;167(4):751-756. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.12.005. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
8
Incisional hernia recurrence after open elective repair: expertise in abdominal wall surgery matters.开放择期修补术后切口疝复发:腹壁手术专业技能至关重要。
BMC Surg. 2019 Aug 7;19(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12893-019-0569-6.
9
Clinical outcome and quality of life in 100 consecutive laparoscopic totally extra-peritoneal (TEP) groin hernia repairs using fibrin glue (Tisseel™): a United Kingdom experience.100 例连续腹腔镜完全腹膜外(TEP)腹股沟疝修补术使用纤维蛋白胶(Tisseel™)的临床结果和生活质量:英国经验。
Hernia. 2012 Dec;16(6):647-53. doi: 10.1007/s10029-012-0936-z. Epub 2012 Jul 4.
10
A modified laparoscopic hernioplasty (TAPP) is the standard procedure for inguinal and femoral hernias: a retrospective 17-year analysis with 1,123 hernia repairs.改良腹腔镜疝修补术(TAPP)是腹股沟疝和股疝的标准手术:一项对1123例疝修补术的17年回顾性分析。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Feb;28(2):671-82. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3208-9. Epub 2013 Sep 17.

引用本文的文献

1
ENGINE-An EHS Project for Future Guidelines.ENGINE——一项面向未来指南的环境、健康与安全项目。
J Abdom Wall Surg. 2024 Jul 12;3:13007. doi: 10.3389/jaws.2024.13007. eCollection 2024.
2
Ventral Hernia in the Al-Ahsa Region, Saudi Arabia: Risk Factor Knowledge Assessment.沙特阿拉伯艾哈萨地区的腹疝:风险因素知识评估
Cureus. 2022 Dec 16;14(12):e32581. doi: 10.7759/cureus.32581. eCollection 2022 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Patients Undergoing Inguinal Hernia Repair.接受腹股沟疝修补术患者的患者报告结局指标
Front Surg. 2020 Apr 16;7:17. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2020.00017. eCollection 2020.
2
Evidence based medicine manifesto for better healthcare.基于证据的医学宣言,以实现更好的医疗保健。
BMJ. 2017 Jun 20;357:j2973. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j2973.
3
Patients' Perspectives of Surgical Safety: Do They Feel Safe?患者对手术安全的看法:他们感觉安全吗?
Ochsner J. 2015 Summer;15(2):143-8.
4
Patient-reported disease knowledge and educational needs in Lynch syndrome: findings of an interactive multidisciplinary patient conference.林奇综合征患者报告的疾病知识和教育需求:一次交互式多学科患者会议的结果
Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2014 Feb 5;12(1):1. doi: 10.1186/1897-4287-12-1.
5
Exploring patient values in medical decision making: a qualitative study.探讨医学决策中的患者价值观:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 25;8(11):e80051. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080051. eCollection 2013.
6
What patients really want from health care.患者真正从医疗保健中想要得到的东西。
JAMA. 2011 Dec 14;306(22):2500-1. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1819.
7
A pilot study to investigate patients reported knowledge, awareness, and beliefs on health care-associated infection.一项关于调查患者报告的与医疗保健相关感染的知识、意识和信念的试点研究。
Am J Infect Control. 2008 Feb;36(1):63-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2007.01.008.
8
Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't.循证医学:它是什么以及不是什么。
BMJ. 1996 Jan 13;312(7023):71-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71.