Kevin Syam, MBBS, FRCS, is Hip and Knee Fellow, Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Hospital, Gobowen, Oswestry, United Kingdom. Shaheer A. Joiya, MD, is Physician, SHO Orthopedics Department, Yeovil District Hospital, Somerset. Sumayyah Khan, BSc, is Medical Student, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Lasi, Romania. P. Nithin Unnikrishnan, MBBS, FRCS, is Consultant Adult Lower Limb Reconstruction Surgeon, Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Hospital. The authors have disclosed no financial relationships related to this article. Submitted November 8, 2020; accepted in revised form January 8, 2021.
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2021 Nov 1;34(11):603-607. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000792928.08722.ae.
To critically analyze the existing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the clinical, economic, and psychological implications of maggot debridement therapy (MDT).
An exhaustive literature search for English-language publications was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed.
Keywords used for the search were based on the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) framework. The titles, abstracts, and relevant full-text articles were screened. Seven RCTs were selected after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Data pertaining to the primary and secondary outcomes of each study were extracted.
The data extracted were evaluated and categorized into clinical, economic, and psychological outcomes pertaining to MDT. A judicious evaluation of these outcomes was made, and the following conclusions were drawn.
There exists heterogeneity in the extant RCTs, but MDT appears to be effective for a quick early debridement. For diabetic foot ulcers, MDT improves debridement, controls infection, and enhances wound healing. In chronic peripheral vascular disease ulcers, it aids in early debridement, but the final outcome is equivocal. Further robust integrated health economic and parallel qualitative assessment studies are recommended to understand the cost-effectiveness and patient acceptability and experience.
批判性分析蛆虫清创疗法(MDT)在临床、经济和心理方面影响的现有随机对照试验(RCT)。
使用 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 PubMed 进行了全面的英文文献检索。
搜索中使用的关键词基于 PICO(人群、干预、比较、结局)框架。筛选标题、摘要和相关全文文章。在应用纳入和排除标准后,选择了 7 项 RCT。
提取了每个研究的主要和次要结局的数据。
对提取的数据进行评估,并分为与 MDT 相关的临床、经济和心理结局。对这些结局进行了明智的评估,并得出以下结论。
现有 RCT 存在异质性,但 MDT 似乎对快速早期清创有效。对于糖尿病足溃疡,MDT 可改善清创、控制感染和促进伤口愈合。在慢性周围血管疾病溃疡中,它有助于早期清创,但最终结果存在争议。建议进一步开展稳健的综合健康经济和并行定性评估研究,以了解成本效益和患者的可接受性和体验。