• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

原发大体肿瘤体积与预后相关,并提示上食管癌的治疗选择。

Primary gross tumor volume is prognostic and suggests treatment in upper esophageal cancer.

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, No. 420, Fuma Road, Fuzhou, 350014, China.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2021 Oct 21;21(1):1130. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08838-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12885-021-08838-w
PMID:34670513
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8529770/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To aid clinicians strategizing treatment for upper esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), this retrospective study investigated associations between primary gross tumor volume (GTVp) and prognosis in patients given surgical resection, radiotherapy, or both resection and radiotherapy.

METHODS

The population comprised 568 patients with upper ESCC given definitive treatment, including 238, 216, and 114 who underwent surgery, radiotherapy, or combined radiotherapy and surgery. GTVp as a continuous variable was entered into the multivariate Cox model using penalized splines (P-splines) to determine the optimal cutoff value. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust imbalanced characteristics among the treatment groups.

RESULTS

P-spline regression revealed a dependence of patient outcomes on GTVp, with 30 cm being an optimal cut-off for differences in overall and progression-free survival (OS, PFS). GTVp ≥30 cm was a negative independent prognostic factor for OS and PFS. PSM analyses confirmed the prognostic value of GTVp. For GTVp < 30 cm, no significant survival differences were observed among the 3 treatments. For GTVp ≥30 cm, the worst 5-year OS rate was experienced by those given surgery. The 5-year PFS rate of patients given combined radiotherapy and surgery was significantly better than that of patients given radiotherapy. The surgical complications of patients given the combined treatment were comparable to those who received surgery, but radiation side effects were significantly lower.

CONCLUSION

GTVp is prognostic for OS and PFS in upper ESCC. For patients with GTVp ≥30 cm, radiotherapy plus surgery was more effective than either treatment alone.

摘要

背景

为帮助临床医生制定治疗上食管鳞癌(ESCC)的策略,本回顾性研究调查了接受手术切除、放疗或手术联合放疗的患者原发肿瘤大体体积(GTVp)与预后之间的关系。

方法

该人群包括 568 例接受确定性治疗的上 ESCC 患者,其中 238 例、216 例和 114 例分别接受手术、放疗或联合放疗和手术。使用惩罚样条(P-splines)将 GTVp 作为连续变量输入多变量 Cox 模型,以确定最佳截断值。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)调整治疗组之间的不平衡特征。

结果

P-spline 回归显示患者结局与 GTVp 相关,GTVp 为 30cm 时,总生存(OS)和无进展生存(PFS)的差异具有最佳截断值。GTVp≥30cm 是 OS 和 PFS 的独立负预后因素。PSM 分析证实了 GTVp 的预后价值。对于 GTVp<30cm,3 种治疗方法之间的生存差异无统计学意义。对于 GTVp≥30cm,手术组患者的 5 年 OS 率最差。接受放化疗联合治疗的患者 5 年 PFS 率明显优于放疗组。联合治疗组患者的手术并发症与手术组相当,但放射副作用明显较低。

结论

GTVp 对上食管 ESCC 的 OS 和 PFS 具有预后价值。对于 GTVp≥30cm 的患者,放疗联合手术比单独治疗更有效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/577a/8529770/061331292e34/12885_2021_8838_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/577a/8529770/3795f5543d5d/12885_2021_8838_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/577a/8529770/1543f29f6779/12885_2021_8838_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/577a/8529770/fc5e0e360d8b/12885_2021_8838_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/577a/8529770/061331292e34/12885_2021_8838_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/577a/8529770/3795f5543d5d/12885_2021_8838_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/577a/8529770/1543f29f6779/12885_2021_8838_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/577a/8529770/fc5e0e360d8b/12885_2021_8838_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/577a/8529770/061331292e34/12885_2021_8838_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Primary gross tumor volume is prognostic and suggests treatment in upper esophageal cancer.原发大体肿瘤体积与预后相关,并提示上食管癌的治疗选择。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Oct 21;21(1):1130. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08838-w.
2
Optimal Time-to-Surgery Recommendations Based on Primary Tumor Volume Regression for Patients with Resectable Esophageal Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy: A Retrospective Study.新辅助放化疗后可切除食管癌患者基于原发肿瘤体积退缩的最佳手术时机推荐:一项回顾性研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Jun;31(6):3803-3812. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-14941-6. Epub 2024 Jan 27.
3
Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Combined Chemoimmunotherapy With or Without Radiation Therapy for Stage IVB Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Multicenter Propensity Score Matching Analysis.比较 IVB 期食管鳞癌联合化疗免疫治疗与单纯化疗免疫治疗的疗效和安全性:多中心倾向评分匹配分析。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2024 Nov 15;120(4):1084-1095. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.06.008. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
4
Benefit of chemotherapy based on platinum with definitive radiotherapy in older patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.含铂化疗联合根治性放疗治疗局部晚期食管鳞癌老年患者的获益。
Radiat Oncol. 2021 Oct 30;16(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s13014-021-01931-1.
5
[Prognostic analysis of definitive radiotherapy for early esophageal carcinoma(T1-2N0M0): a multi-center retrospective study of Jing-Jin-ji Esophageal and Esophagogastric Cancer Radiotherapy Oncology Group].早期食管癌(T1-2N0M0)根治性放疗的预后分析:京津冀食管癌和食管胃交界癌放射肿瘤学组多中心回顾性研究
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2020 Feb 23;42(2):139-144. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2020.02.010.
6
Relative tumor volume is a better independent prognostic factor in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Results of a retrospective study.相对肿瘤体积是食管鳞状细胞癌更好的独立预后因素:一项回顾性研究结果
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Apr;98(14):e14963. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014963.
7
[The efficacy and safety of high dose versus standard dose radiotherapy in concurrent chemoradiotherapy for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma].[高剂量与标准剂量放疗在食管鳞状细胞癌患者同步放化疗中的疗效与安全性]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2019 Feb 23;41(2):135-139. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2019.02.011.
8
Prognostic value of tumor length and diameter for esophageal squamous cell cancer patients treated with definitive (chemo)radiotherapy: Potential indicators for nonsurgical T staging.根治性放化疗治疗食管鳞癌患者的肿瘤长度和直径的预后价值:非手术 T 分期的潜在指标。
Cancer Med. 2019 Oct;8(14):6326-6334. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2532. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
9
Cardiac radiation dose predicts survival in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated by definitive concurrent chemotherapy and intensity modulated radiotherapy.心脏剂量预测根治性同步化疗和调强放疗治疗食管鳞癌的生存。
Radiat Oncol. 2020 Sep 22;15(1):221. doi: 10.1186/s13014-020-01664-7.
10
Programmed cell death-ligand 1 expression predicts poor treatment response and prognostic value in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients without esophagectomy.程序性细胞死亡配体 1 表达可预测未经手术切除的食管鳞癌患者治疗反应差和预后不良。
Aging (Albany NY). 2021 Jul 22;13(14):18827-18838. doi: 10.18632/aging.203326.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a prognostic nomogram and risk stratification system for elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma undergoing definitive radiotherapy: a multicenter retrospective analysis (3JECROG R-03 A).老年食管鳞状细胞癌患者根治性放疗预后列线图及风险分层系统的建立:一项多中心回顾性分析(3JECROG R - 03 A)
BMC Cancer. 2025 Jan 8;25(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-13414-z.
2
Dose escalation in radical radio(chemo)therapy for cervical and upper thoracic esophageal cancer with 3DCRT/IMRT (ChC&UES): a multicenter retrospective study.三维适形放疗/调强放疗根治性放化疗治疗颈胸上段食管癌的剂量递增:一项多中心回顾性研究。
Radiat Oncol. 2024 Sep 27;19(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s13014-024-02521-7.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Definitive Chemoradiotherapy Compared to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy With Esophagectomy for Locoregional Esophageal Cancer: National Population-based Cohort Study.局部区域性食管癌的根治性放化疗与新辅助放化疗加手术治疗的比较:全国基于人群的队列研究。
Ann Surg. 2022 Mar 1;275(3):526-533. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003941.
2
Treatment of Locally Advanced Esophageal Carcinoma: ASCO Guideline.局部晚期食管癌的治疗:ASCO 指南。
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Aug 10;38(23):2677-2694. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.00866. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
3
Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Cancers, Version 2.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.
Exploring the significance of tumor volume in endometrial cancer: Clinical pathological features, prognosis, and adjuvant therapies.
探讨肿瘤体积在子宫内膜癌中的意义:临床病理特征、预后和辅助治疗。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Dec 15;102(50):e36442. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036442.
4
The Prognostic Significance of Nomogram-Based Pretreatment Inflammatory Indicators in Patients With Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Receiving Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy.基于列线图的预处理炎症指标对接受调强放疗的食管鳞癌患者的预后意义。
Cancer Control. 2023 Jan-Dec;30:10732748231185025. doi: 10.1177/10732748231185025.
5
Influence of age as a continuous variable on survival outcomes and treatment options in patients with upper thoracic esophageal carcinoma.年龄作为连续变量对上段食管癌患者生存结局及治疗选择的影响。
J Cancer. 2023 Apr 9;14(6):1039-1048. doi: 10.7150/jca.83490. eCollection 2023.
6
Development of a prognostic nomogram and risk stratification system for upper thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.胸段上段食管鳞状细胞癌预后列线图及风险分层系统的开发
Front Oncol. 2023 Apr 12;13:1059539. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1059539. eCollection 2023.
7
A Study on Risk Factors Associated with Reflux Esophagitis in Patients Undergoing Esophageal Cancer Surgery.食管癌手术患者反流性食管炎相关危险因素的研究。
J Healthc Eng. 2022 Mar 27;2022:3409693. doi: 10.1155/2022/3409693. eCollection 2022.
食管和胃食管交界处癌,2019 年第 2 版,NCCN 肿瘤学临床实践指南。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 Jul 1;17(7):855-883. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.0033.
4
Nomogram to Predict Overall Survival for Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients After Radical Esophagectomy.列线图预测根治性食管切除术后胸段食管鳞癌患者的总生存。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Sep;26(9):2890-2898. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07393-w. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
5
Relative tumor volume is a better independent prognostic factor in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Results of a retrospective study.相对肿瘤体积是食管鳞状细胞癌更好的独立预后因素:一项回顾性研究结果
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Apr;98(14):e14963. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014963.
6
Influence of Neoadjuvant Therapy on Poor Long-Term Outcomes of Postoperative Complications in Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study.新辅助治疗对食管鳞癌患者术后并发症不良长期结局的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Jul;26(7):2081-2089. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07312-z. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
7
Proposed revision of the 8th edition AJCC clinical staging system for esophageal squamous cell cancer treated with definitive chemo-IMRT based on CT imaging.基于 CT 影像学的根治性放化疗治疗食管鳞癌第 8 版 AJCC 临床分期系统的修订建议。
Radiat Oncol. 2019 Mar 28;14(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s13014-019-1258-4.
8
Elective nodal irradiation or involved-field irradiation in definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell cancer: a retrospective analysis in clinical N0 patients.食管鳞状细胞癌根治性放化疗中选择性淋巴结照射或累及野照射:临床N0患者的回顾性分析
Curr Oncol. 2018 Oct;25(5):e423-e429. doi: 10.3747/co.25.3895. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
9
Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.全球癌症统计数据 2018:GLOBOCAN 对全球 185 个国家/地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率的估计。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
10
Definitive chemoradiotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for stage II to III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.根治性放化疗对比新辅助放化疗后手术治疗 II 期到 III 期食管鳞癌。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Jun;155(6):2710-2721.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.01.086. Epub 2018 Feb 15.