Suppr超能文献

三维适形放疗/调强放疗根治性放化疗治疗颈胸上段食管癌的剂量递增:一项多中心回顾性研究。

Dose escalation in radical radio(chemo)therapy for cervical and upper thoracic esophageal cancer with 3DCRT/IMRT (ChC&UES): a multicenter retrospective study.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, No. 12 Jiankan Road, Chang'an District, Shijiazhuang, 050011, China.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Huanhuxi Road, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, China.

出版信息

Radiat Oncol. 2024 Sep 27;19(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s13014-024-02521-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cervical and upper thoracic esophageal cancer (ESCA) presents treatment challenges due to limited clinical evidence. This multi-center study (ChC&UES) explores radical radio(chemo)therapy efficacy and safety, especially focusing on radiation dose.

METHOD

We retrospectively analyzed clinical data from 1,422 cases across 8 medical centers. According to the radiation dose for primary gross tumor, patients were divided into standard dose radiotherapy (SD, 50-55 Gy) or high dose (HD, > 55 Gy) radiotherapy. HD was further subdivided into conventional- high-dose group (HD-conventional, 55-63 Gy) and ultra-high-dose group (HD-ultra, ≥ 63 Gy). Primary outcome was Overall Survival (OS).

RESULTS

The median OS was 33.0 months (95% CI: 29.401-36.521) in the whole cohort. Compared with SD, HD shown significant improved survival in cervical ESCA in Kaplan-Meier (P = 0.029) and cox multivariate regression analysis (P = 0.024) while shown comparable survival in upper thoracic ESCA (P = 0.735). No significant difference existed between HD-conventional and HD-ultra in cervical (P = 0.976) and upper thoracic (P = 0.610) ESCA. Incidences of radiation esophagitis and pneumonia from HD were comparable to SD (P = 0.097, 0.240), while myosuppression risk was higher(P = 0.039). The Bonferroni method revealed that, for both cervical and upper thoracic ESCA, HD-ultra enhance the objective response rate (ORR) compared to SD (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

HD radiotherapy benefits cervical but not upper thoracic ESCA, while increasing bone marrow suppression risk. Further dose escalating (≥ 63 Gy) doesn't improve survival but enhances ORR.

摘要

背景

由于临床证据有限,颈段和胸上段食管癌(ESCA)的治疗具有挑战性。本多中心研究(ChC&UES)探讨了根治性放化疗的疗效和安全性,尤其关注放射剂量。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 8 家医疗中心的 1422 例患者的临床数据。根据原发肿瘤大体靶区的放射剂量,患者分为标准剂量放疗(SD,50-55Gy)或高剂量放疗(HD,>55Gy)。HD 进一步分为常规高剂量组(HD-conventional,55-63Gy)和超高剂量组(HD-ultra,≥63Gy)。主要终点是总生存期(OS)。

结果

全队列的中位 OS 为 33.0 个月(95%CI:29.401-36.521)。与 SD 相比,HD 在颈段 ESCA 中显示出显著改善的生存,在 Kaplan-Meier 分析(P=0.029)和 Cox 多因素回归分析(P=0.024)中均有统计学意义,而上段 ESCA 中则无显著差异(P=0.735)。在颈段(P=0.976)和上胸段 ESCA(P=0.610)中,HD-conventional 和 HD-ultra 之间的放射性食管炎和肺炎发生率无显著差异。与 SD 相比,HD 的骨髓抑制风险更高(P=0.039),但放射性食管炎和肺炎的发生率相当(P=0.097,0.240)。Bonferroni 法显示,对于颈段和上胸段 ESCA,HD-ultra 均提高了客观缓解率(ORR),与 SD 相比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

HD 放疗有益于颈段 ESCA,但对上段 ESCA 无益,同时增加骨髓抑制风险。进一步增加剂量(≥63Gy)并不能提高生存率,但能提高客观缓解率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae89/11429629/e0b6ec646415/13014_2024_2521_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验