• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家族性与散发性颅内动脉瘤破裂风险的差异:一项个体患者数据荟萃分析。

Difference in Rupture Risk Between Familial and Sporadic Intracranial Aneurysms: An Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis.

作者信息

Zuurbier Charlotte C M, Mensing Liselore A, Wermer Marieke J H, Juvela Seppo, Lindgren Antti E, Koivisto Timo, Jääskeläinen Juha E, Yamazaki Tomosato, Molenberg Rob, van Dijk J Marc C, Uyttenboogaart Maarten, Aalbers Marlien, Morita Akio, Tominari Shinjiro, Arai Hajime, Nozaki Kazuhiko, Murayama Yuichi, Ishibashi Toshihiro, Takao Hiroyuki, Rinkel Gabriel J E, Greving Jacoba P, Ruigrok Ynte M

机构信息

From the Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center (C.C.M.Z., L.A.M., G.J.E.R., Y.M.R.), and Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care (J.P.G.), University Medical Center Utrecht; Department of Neurology (M.J.H.W.), Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands; Department of Clinical Neurosciences (S.J.), University of Helsinki; Neurosurgery of NeuroCenter (A.E.L., T.K., J.E.J.), University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland; Department of Neurosurgery (T.Y.), National Hospital Organization, Mito Medical Center, Japan; Departments of Neurosurgery (R.M., J.M.C.v.D., M.U., M.A.), University Medical Center Groningen, the Netherlands; University of Tokyo-Nippon Medical School (A.M.); Department of Health Informatics, School of Public Health (S.T.), Kyoto University; Department of Neurosurgery (H.A.), Juntendo University Medical School, Tokyo; Department of Neurosurgery (K.N.), Shiga University of Medical Science; and Department of Endovascular Neurosurgery (Y.M., T.I., H.T.), Tokyo Jikei University School of Medicine, Japan.

出版信息

Neurology. 2021 Nov 30;97(22):e2195-e2203. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012885. Epub 2021 Oct 20.

DOI:10.1212/WNL.0000000000012885
PMID:34670818
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

We combined individual patient data (IPD) from prospective cohorts of patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) to assess to what extent patients with familial UIA have a higher rupture risk than those with sporadic UIA.

METHODS

For this IPD meta-analysis, we performed an Embase and PubMed search for studies published up to December 1, 2020. We included studies that (1) had a prospective study design; (2) included 50 or more patients with UIA; (3) studied the natural course of UIA and risk factors for aneurysm rupture including family history for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage and UIA; and (4) had aneurysm rupture as an outcome. Cohorts with available IPD were included. All studies included patients with newly diagnosed UIA visiting one of the study centers. The primary outcome was aneurysmal rupture. Patients with polycystic kidney disease and moyamoya disease were excluded. We compared rupture rates of familial vs sporadic UIA using a Cox proportional hazard regression model adjusted for PHASES score and smoking. We performed 2 analyses: (1) only studies defining first-degree relatives as parents, children, and siblings and (2) all studies, including those in which first-degree relatives are defined as only parents and children, but not siblings.

RESULTS

We pooled IPD from 8 cohorts with a low and moderate risk of bias. First-degree relatives were defined as parents, siblings, and children in 6 cohorts (29% Dutch, 55% Finnish, 15% Japanese), totaling 2,297 patients (17% familial, 399 patients) with 3,089 UIAs and 7,301 person-years follow-up. Rupture occurred in 10 familial cases (rupture rate: 0.89%/person-year; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45-1.59) and 41 sporadic cases (0.66%/person-year; 95% CI 0.48-0.89); adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for familial cases 2.56 (95% CI 1.18-5.56). After adding the 2 cohorts excluding siblings as first-degree relatives, resulting in 9,511 patients, the adjusted HR was 1.44 (95% CI 0.86-2.40).

DISCUSSION

The risk of rupture of UIA is 2.5 times higher, with a range from a 1.2 to 5 times higher risk, in familial than in sporadic UIA. When assessing the risk of rupture in UIA, family history should be taken into account.

摘要

背景与目的

我们合并了未破裂颅内动脉瘤(UIA)患者前瞻性队列的个体患者数据(IPD),以评估家族性UIA患者的破裂风险比散发性UIA患者高多少。

方法

对于这项IPD荟萃分析,我们在Embase和PubMed上检索了截至2020年12月1日发表的研究。我们纳入的研究需满足以下条件:(1)具有前瞻性研究设计;(2)纳入50名或更多UIA患者;(3)研究UIA的自然病程和动脉瘤破裂的危险因素,包括动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血和UIA的家族史;(4)以动脉瘤破裂作为结局。纳入有可用IPD的队列。所有研究均纳入了在其中一个研究中心就诊的新诊断UIA患者。主要结局是动脉瘤破裂。排除多囊肾病和烟雾病患者。我们使用调整了PHASES评分和吸烟情况的Cox比例风险回归模型比较家族性和散发性UIA的破裂率。我们进行了两项分析:(1)仅纳入将一级亲属定义为父母、子女和兄弟姐妹的研究;(2)所有研究,包括那些将一级亲属仅定义为父母和子女但不包括兄弟姐妹的研究。

结果

我们汇总了8个偏倚风险低和中等的队列的IPD。在6个队列(29%为荷兰人、55%为芬兰人、15%为日本人)中,一级亲属被定义为父母、兄弟姐妹和子女,共有2297例患者(17%为家族性,399例患者),有3089个UIA,随访7301人年。10例家族性病例发生破裂(破裂率:0.89%/人年;95%置信区间[CI]0.45 - 1.59),41例散发性病例发生破裂(0.66%/人年;95%CI 0.48 - 0.89);家族性病例的调整风险比(HR)为2.56(95%CI 1.18 - 5.56)。在加入另外2个不将兄弟姐妹视为一级亲属的队列后,患者总数达到9511例,调整后的HR为1.44(95%CI 0.86 - 2.40)。

讨论

家族性UIA的破裂风险比散发性UIA高2.5倍,风险范围为高1.2至5倍。在评估UIA的破裂风险时,应考虑家族史。

相似文献

1
Difference in Rupture Risk Between Familial and Sporadic Intracranial Aneurysms: An Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis.家族性与散发性颅内动脉瘤破裂风险的差异:一项个体患者数据荟萃分析。
Neurology. 2021 Nov 30;97(22):e2195-e2203. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012885. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
2
Comparison of Rupture Risk of Intracranial Aneurysms Between Familial and Sporadic Patients.颅内动脉瘤患者中家族性与散发性动脉瘤破裂风险的比较。
Stroke. 2019 Jun;50(6):1380-1383. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.023783. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
3
Sex Difference and Rupture Rate of Intracranial Aneurysms: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis.颅内动脉瘤的性别差异和破裂率:一项个体患者数据荟萃分析。
Stroke. 2022 Feb;53(2):362-369. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.035187. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
4
Growth and rupture of unruptured intracranial aneurysms.颅内未破裂动脉瘤的生长与破裂。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Sep 14;131(3):843-851. doi: 10.3171/2018.4.JNS18687. Print 2019 Sep 1.
5
Carotid intima-media thickness--a potential predictor for rupture risk of intracranial aneurysms.颈动脉内膜中层厚度——颅内动脉瘤破裂风险的潜在预测指标。
Int J Stroke. 2014 Oct;9(7):866-72. doi: 10.1111/ijs.12159. Epub 2013 Oct 22.
6
Aneurysm Prevalence and Quality of Life During Screening in Relatives of Patients With Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Prospective Study.未破裂颅内动脉瘤患者亲属的动脉瘤患病率和筛查期间的生活质量:一项前瞻性研究。
Neurology. 2023 Aug 29;101(9):e904-e912. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207475. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
7
Lifelong rupture risk of intracranial aneurysms depends on risk factors: a prospective Finnish cohort study.颅内动脉瘤终身破裂风险取决于危险因素:一项前瞻性芬兰队列研究。
Stroke. 2014 Jul;45(7):1958-63. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.005318. Epub 2014 May 22.
8
Screening for intracranial aneurysms? Prevalence of unruptured intracranial aneurysms in Hong Kong Chinese.颅内动脉瘤筛查?香港华人未破裂颅内动脉瘤的患病率。
J Neurosurg. 2016 May;124(5):1245-9. doi: 10.3171/2015.4.JNS142938. Epub 2015 Oct 16.
9
Visit-to-visit variability in systolic blood pressure is a novel risk factor for the growth of intracranial aneurysms.收缩压的变异性是颅内动脉瘤生长的一个新的危险因素。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013;36(5-6):401-6. doi: 10.1159/000356217. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
10
Treatment Scoring of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms.颅内未破裂动脉瘤的治疗评分。
Stroke. 2019 Sep;50(9):2344-2350. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025599. Epub 2019 Jul 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and external validation of the SMASHERS risk prediction model for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage in the general population: a population-based prospective cohort study.一般人群中动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血的SMASHERS风险预测模型的开发与外部验证:一项基于人群的前瞻性队列研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 15;15(1):e091756. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091756.
2
Risk factor synergism in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a cross-sectional study.动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血中的危险因素协同作用:一项横断面研究。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023 Dec;165(12):3665-3676. doi: 10.1007/s00701-023-05852-8. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
3
European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines on management of unruptured intracranial aneurysms.
欧洲卒中组织(ESO)关于未破裂颅内动脉瘤管理的指南。
Eur Stroke J. 2022 Sep;7(3):V. doi: 10.1177/23969873221099736. Epub 2022 Jun 3.