Wang Hong-Liang, Lu Wei-Jie, Zhang Yue-Lin, Nie Chun-Hui, Zhou Tan-Yang, Zhou Guan-Hui, Zhu Tong-Yin, Wang Bao-Quan, Chen Sheng-Qun, Yu Zi-Niu, Jing Li, Sun Jun-Hui
Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Interventional Treatment Center, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Zhejiang Provincial Research Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Hepatobiliary Diseases, Hangzhou, China.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Oct 4;8:737984. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.737984. eCollection 2021.
The purpose of our study was to conduct a retrospective analysis to compare the effectiveness of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) in the treatment of patients with cirrhosis with or without portal vein thrombosis (PVT). We included a total of 203 cirrhosis patients successfully treated with TIPS between January 2015 and January 2018, including 72 cirrhosis patients with PVT (35.5%) and 131 without PVT (64.5%). Our subjects were followed for at least 1 year after treatment with TIPS. Data were collected to estimate the mortality, shunt dysfunction, and complication rates after TIPS creation. During the mean follow-up time of 19.5 ± 12.8 months, 21 (10.3%) patients died, 15 (7.4%) developed shunt dysfunction, and 44 (21.6%) experienced overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE). No significant differences in mortality ( = 0.134), shunt dysfunction ( = 0.214), or OHE ( = 0.632) were noted between the groups. Age, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, and refractory ascites requiring TIPS were risk factors for mortality. A history of diabetes, percutaneous transhepatic variceal embolization (PTVE), 8-mm diameter stent, and platelet (PLT) increased the risk of shunt dysfunction. The prevalence of variceal bleeding and recurrent ascites was comparable between the two groups (16.7 vs. 16.7% = 0.998 and 2.7 vs. 3.8% = 0.678, respectively). Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts are feasible in the management of cirrhosis with PVT. No significant differences in survival or shunt dysfunction were noted between the PVT and no-PVT groups. The risk of recurrent variceal bleeding, recurrent ascites, and OHE in the PVT group was generally similar to that in the no-PVT group. TIPS represents a potentially feasible treatment option in cirrhosis patients with PVT.
我们研究的目的是进行一项回顾性分析,以比较经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)在治疗伴有或不伴有门静脉血栓形成(PVT)的肝硬化患者中的有效性。我们纳入了2015年1月至2018年1月期间成功接受TIPS治疗的203例肝硬化患者,其中包括72例伴有PVT的肝硬化患者(35.5%)和131例不伴有PVT的患者(64.5%)。我们的研究对象在接受TIPS治疗后至少随访1年。收集数据以评估TIPS建立后的死亡率、分流功能障碍和并发症发生率。在平均随访时间19.5±12.8个月期间,21例(10.3%)患者死亡,15例(7.4%)出现分流功能障碍,44例(21.6%)发生明显肝性脑病(OHE)。两组之间在死亡率(P = 0.134)、分流功能障碍(P = 0.214)或OHE(P = 0.632)方面未发现显著差异。年龄、终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分以及需要TIPS治疗的顽固性腹水是死亡率的危险因素。糖尿病史、经皮肝穿曲张静脉栓塞术(PTVE)、直径8毫米的支架以及血小板(PLT)增加了分流功能障碍的风险。两组之间静脉曲张出血和复发性腹水的发生率相当(分别为16.7%对16.7%,P = 0.998;2.7%对3.8%,P = 0.678)。经颈静脉肝内门体分流术在伴有PVT的肝硬化管理中是可行的。PVT组和无PVT组在生存率或分流功能障碍方面未发现显著差异。PVT组中静脉曲张再出血、复发性腹水和OHE的风险通常与无PVT组相似。TIPS是伴有PVT的肝硬化患者一种潜在可行的治疗选择。