• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

建立简明的儿童机动车事故损伤严重度预测模型。

Development of a concise injury severity prediction model for pediatric patients involved in a motor vehicle collision.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.

Department of Public Health, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.

出版信息

Traffic Inj Prev. 2021;22(sup1):S74-S81. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2021.1975275. Epub 2021 Oct 21.

DOI:10.1080/15389588.2021.1975275
PMID:34672889
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8792360/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Transporting severely injured pediatric patients to a trauma center has been shown to decrease mortality. A decision support tool to assist emergency medical services (EMS) providers with trauma triage would be both as parsimonious as possible and highly accurate. The objective of this study was to determine the minimum set of predictors required to accurately predict severe injury in pediatric patients.

METHODS

Crash data and patient injuries were obtained from the NASS and CISS databases. A baseline multivariable logistic model was developed to predict severe injury in pediatric patients using the following predictors: age, sex, seat row, restraint use, ejection, entrapment, posted speed limit, any airbag deployment, principal direction of force (PDOF), change in velocity (delta-V), single vs. multiple collisions, and non-rollover vs. rollover. The outcomes of interest were injury severity score (ISS) ≥16 and the Target Injury List (TIL). Accuracy was measured by the cross-validation mean of the receiver operator curve (ROC) area under the curve (AUC). We used Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) based on all subsets regression to determine the importance of each variable separately for each outcome. The AUC of the highest performing model for each number of variables was compared to the baseline model to assess for a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). A reduced variable set model was derived using this information.

RESULTS

The baseline models performed well (ISS ≥ 16: AUC 0.91 [95% CI: 0.86-0.95], TIL: AUC 0.90 [95% CI: 0.86-0.94]). Using BMA, the rank of the importance of the predictors was identical for both ISS ≥ 16 and TIL. There was no statistically significant decrease in accuracy until the models were reduced to fewer than five and six variables for predicting ISS ≥ 16 and TIL, respectively. A reduced variable set model developed using the top five variables (delta-V, entrapment, ejection, restraint use, and near-side collision) to predict ISS ≥ 16 had an AUC 0.90 [95% CI: 0.84-0.96]. Among the models that did not include delta-V, the highest AUC was 0.82 [95% CI: 0.77-0.87].

CONCLUSIONS

A succinct logistic regression model can accurately predict severely injured pediatric patients, which could be used for prehospital trauma triage. However, there remains a critical need to obtain delta-V in real-time.

摘要

目的

将严重受伤的儿科患者转运到创伤中心已被证明可以降低死亡率。一种用于协助紧急医疗服务(EMS)提供者进行创伤分诊的决策支持工具应尽可能简约且高度准确。本研究的目的是确定准确预测儿科患者严重损伤所需的最小预测因子集。

方法

从 NASS 和 CISS 数据库中获取碰撞数据和患者损伤情况。使用以下预测因子开发了基线多变量逻辑模型,以预测儿科患者的严重损伤:年龄、性别、座位排、约束使用、弹射、被困、公布限速、任何安全气囊展开、主要力方向(PDOF)、速度变化(delta-V)、单次碰撞与多次碰撞、非翻车与翻车。感兴趣的结果是损伤严重程度评分(ISS)≥16 和目标损伤列表(TIL)。准确性通过交叉验证的接收器操作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)的均值进行测量。我们使用基于全子集回归的贝叶斯模型平均(BMA)来确定每个变量对于每个结果的重要性。与基线模型相比,比较每个变量数量最高的模型的 AUC,以评估是否存在统计学差异(p<0.05)。使用该信息推导出一个简化变量集模型。

结果

基线模型表现良好(ISS≥16:AUC 0.91[95%CI:0.86-0.95],TIL:AUC 0.90[95%CI:0.86-0.94])。使用 BMA,对于 ISS≥16 和 TIL,预测因子的重要性排名相同。直到模型减少到预测 ISS≥16 和 TIL 的变量少于五和六个时,准确性才没有统计学显著下降。使用前五个变量(delta-V、被困、弹射、约束使用和近侧碰撞)开发的简化变量集模型预测 ISS≥16 的 AUC 为 0.90[95%CI:0.84-0.96]。在不包括 delta-V 的模型中,最高 AUC 为 0.82[95%CI:0.77-0.87]。

结论

简洁的逻辑回归模型可以准确预测严重受伤的儿科患者,可用于院前创伤分诊。然而,仍然迫切需要实时获得 delta-V。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/772e/8792360/fbe81f14e78f/nihms-1769011-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/772e/8792360/51d7abb25799/nihms-1769011-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/772e/8792360/b97f83d861aa/nihms-1769011-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/772e/8792360/fbe81f14e78f/nihms-1769011-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/772e/8792360/51d7abb25799/nihms-1769011-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/772e/8792360/b97f83d861aa/nihms-1769011-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/772e/8792360/fbe81f14e78f/nihms-1769011-f0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of a concise injury severity prediction model for pediatric patients involved in a motor vehicle collision.建立简明的儿童机动车事故损伤严重度预测模型。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2021;22(sup1):S74-S81. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2021.1975275. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
2
Crash Telemetry-Based Injury Severity Prediction is Equivalent to or Out-Performs Field Protocols in Triage of Planar Vehicle Collisions.基于碰撞数据的损伤严重度预测在平面车辆碰撞的分诊中与现场方案等效或优于现场方案。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2019 Aug;34(4):356-362. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X19004515. Epub 2019 Jul 19.
3
Accuracy of algorithms to predict injury severity in older adults for trauma triage.算法预测老年创伤患者严重程度用于创伤分诊的准确性。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(sup2):S81-S87. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2019.1688795. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
4
Evaluation of Vehicle-Based Crash Severity Metrics.基于车辆的碰撞严重程度指标评估。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16 Suppl 2:S132-9. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1067693.
5
Identification and validation of a logistic regression model for predicting serious injuries associated with motor vehicle crashes.识别和验证用于预测与机动车碰撞相关的严重伤害的逻辑回归模型。
Accid Anal Prev. 2011 Jan;43(1):112-22. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.07.018. Epub 2010 Aug 21.
6
On scene injury severity prediction (OSISP) algorithm for car occupants.汽车乘客的现场损伤严重程度预测(OSISP)算法
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Aug;81:211-7. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.04.032. Epub 2015 May 25.
7
Comparison and validation of injury risk classifiers for advanced automated crash notification systems.先进自动碰撞通知系统损伤风险分类器的比较与验证
Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15 Suppl 1:S126-33. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2014.927577.
8
Factors influencing pediatric Injury Severity Score and Glasgow Coma Scale in pediatric automobile crashes: results from the Crash Injury Research Engineering Network.影响儿童汽车碰撞事故中儿童损伤严重度评分和格拉斯哥昏迷量表的因素:碰撞损伤研究工程网络的结果
J Pediatr Surg. 2006 Nov;41(11):1854-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.06.012.
9
Evaluating the Potential Benefits of Advanced Automatic Crash Notification.评估先进自动碰撞通知的潜在益处。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017 Apr;32(2):156-164. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X16001473. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
10
Evaluation of mechanism of injury criteria for field triage of occupants involved in motor vehicle collisions.评估机动车碰撞中伤员现场分拣损伤机制标准。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2022;23(sup1):S143-S148. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2022.2092101. Epub 2022 Jul 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of mechanism of injury criteria for field triage of occupants involved in motor vehicle collisions.评估机动车碰撞中伤员现场分拣损伤机制标准。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2022;23(sup1):S143-S148. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2022.2092101. Epub 2022 Jul 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Advanced Automatic Crash Notification Algorithm for Children.高级儿童自动碰撞通知算法。
Acad Pediatr. 2022 Aug;22(6):1057-1064. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2022.02.016. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
2
Effect of under triage on early mortality after major pediatric trauma: a registry-based propensity score matching analysis.分诊不足对儿科重大创伤后早期死亡率的影响:基于登记的倾向评分匹配分析。
World J Emerg Surg. 2021 Jan 7;16(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13017-020-00345-w.
3
Crash Telemetry-Based Injury Severity Prediction is Equivalent to or Out-Performs Field Protocols in Triage of Planar Vehicle Collisions.基于碰撞数据的损伤严重度预测在平面车辆碰撞的分诊中与现场方案等效或优于现场方案。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2019 Aug;34(4):356-362. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X19004515. Epub 2019 Jul 19.
4
A pedestrian serious injury risk prediction method based on posted speed limit.基于限速的行人重伤风险预测方法
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Aug;129:84-93. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.04.021. Epub 2019 May 22.
5
The Major Causes of Death in Children and Adolescents in the United States.美国儿童和青少年的主要死因
N Engl J Med. 2018 Dec 20;379(25):2468-2475. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr1804754.
6
Predicting Pediatric Patients Who Require Care at a Trauma Center: Analysis of Injuries and Other Factors.预测需要到创伤中心接受治疗的儿科患者:损伤和其他因素分析。
J Am Coll Surg. 2018 Jan;226(1):70-79.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.09.018. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
7
Serious injury prediction algorithm based on large-scale data and under-triage control.基于大规模数据和低分流控制的严重损伤预测算法
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Jan;98:266-276. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.09.028. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
8
An Injury Severity-, Time Sensitivity-, and Predictability-Based Advanced Automatic Crash Notification Algorithm Improves Motor Vehicle Crash Occupant Triage.基于损伤严重程度、时间敏感性和可预测性的先进自动碰撞通知算法可改善机动车碰撞伤患分类。
J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Jun;222(6):1211-1219.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.03.028. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
9
Prospective Validation of the National Field Triage Guidelines for Identifying Seriously Injured Persons.用于识别重伤人员的国家现场分诊指南的前瞻性验证
J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Feb;222(2):146-58.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.10.016. Epub 2015 Nov 14.
10
On-Scene Injury Severity Prediction (OSISP) Algorithm for Truck Occupants.卡车驾乘人员现场损伤严重程度预测(OSISP)算法
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16 Suppl 2:S190-6. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1057578.