• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

量化 COPD 患者延迟多吸入器三联疗法起始的经济影响:英国电子病历和医院管理数据的回顾性队列研究。

Quantifying the Economic Impact of Delayed Multiple-Inhaler Triple Therapy Initiation in Patients with COPD: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Linked Electronic Medical Record and Hospital Administrative Data in England.

机构信息

Epidemiology, Value Evidence and Outcomes, GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.

Observational Research, Adelphi Real World, Bollington, UK.

出版信息

Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2021 Oct 8;16:2795-2808. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S312853. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.2147/COPD.S312853
PMID:34675504
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8517427/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess if early multiple-inhaler triple therapy (MITT) initiation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) reduces subsequent healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), direct medical costs, and acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPDs).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective, longitudinal cohort study used electronic health records and linked hospital administrative data in England. COPD patients with an AECOPD between July 2012 and May 2016 (index), and who subsequently started MITT within 180 days were eligible. Patients with an AECOPD 6 months prior to index were excluded. HCRU, direct healthcare costs, and AECOPDs were assessed in the following 24-month period for early (≤30 days) and delayed (31-180 days) MITT initiators.

RESULTS

A total of 934 patients were included in the analysis and categorized as early (n=367, 39%) or delayed (n=567, 61%) MITT initiators. Mean patient age was 68.5 years and 53.2% were male. A significantly higher proportion of delayed MITT initiators required ≥1 outpatient appointment (all-cause) compared with early MITT initiators (87% vs 79%; p=0.0016). A significantly higher proportion of delayed MITT initiators required ≥1 COPD‑related inpatient stay versus early MITT initiators (47% vs 40%; p=0.0262). Over the 24-month follow-up, mean all-cause and COPD-related total healthcare costs were significantly higher in delayed MITT initiators compared with early MITT initiators (all‑cause: £11,348 vs £8126; p=0.0011; COPD-related: £7307 vs £4535; p=0.0009).

CONCLUSION

Delayed initiation of multiple-inhaler triple therapy was associated with higher all-cause and COPD-related costs, suggesting that earlier initiation of triple therapy in COPD patients may help reduce the economic burden on the healthcare system.

摘要

目的

评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者早期三联吸入疗法(MITT)的启动是否能降低随后的医疗资源利用(HCRU)、直接医疗费用和 COPD 急性加重(AECOPD)的发生。

患者和方法

本回顾性、纵向队列研究使用了英国的电子健康记录和相关医院行政数据。2012 年 7 月至 2016 年 5 月期间患有 AECOPD(索引),并在 180 天内开始 MITT 的患者符合条件。索引前 6 个月患有 AECOPD 的患者被排除在外。在接下来的 24 个月中,评估了早期(≤30 天)和延迟(31-180 天)MITT 启动患者的 HCRU、直接医疗费用和 AECOPD。

结果

共有 934 名患者纳入分析,分为早期(n=367,39%)或延迟(n=567,61%)MITT 启动者。患者平均年龄为 68.5 岁,53.2%为男性。与早期 MITT 启动者相比,延迟 MITT 启动者需要≥1 次门诊(所有原因)的比例明显更高(87%比 79%;p=0.0016)。延迟 MITT 启动者需要≥1 次 COPD 相关住院治疗的比例明显高于早期 MITT 启动者(47%比 40%;p=0.0262)。在 24 个月的随访中,与早期 MITT 启动者相比,延迟 MITT 启动者的全因和 COPD 相关总医疗费用明显更高(全因:£11348 比 £8126;p=0.0011;COPD 相关:£7307 比 £4535;p=0.0009)。

结论

延迟启动三联吸入疗法与更高的全因和 COPD 相关费用相关,这表明 COPD 患者更早启动三联疗法可能有助于减轻医疗系统的经济负担。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63c9/8517427/ca8816ef34c5/COPD-16-2795-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63c9/8517427/8d4e21bfe5be/COPD-16-2795-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63c9/8517427/1b61e8e757ef/COPD-16-2795-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63c9/8517427/ca8816ef34c5/COPD-16-2795-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63c9/8517427/8d4e21bfe5be/COPD-16-2795-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63c9/8517427/1b61e8e757ef/COPD-16-2795-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63c9/8517427/ca8816ef34c5/COPD-16-2795-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Quantifying the Economic Impact of Delayed Multiple-Inhaler Triple Therapy Initiation in Patients with COPD: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Linked Electronic Medical Record and Hospital Administrative Data in England.量化 COPD 患者延迟多吸入器三联疗法起始的经济影响:英国电子病历和医院管理数据的回顾性队列研究。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2021 Oct 8;16:2795-2808. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S312853. eCollection 2021.
2
Characteristics of Users and New Initiators of Single- and Multiple-Inhaler Triple Therapy for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Germany.德国慢性阻塞性肺疾病单吸入器和多吸入器三联疗法使用者及新启用者的特征
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2024 Apr 17;19:945-956. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S431291. eCollection 2024.
3
Outcomes Following Initiation of Triple Therapy with Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol versus Multiple-Inhaler Triple Therapy Among Medicare Advantage with Part D Beneficiaries and Those Commercially Enrolled for Health Care Insurance in the United States.在美国,医疗保险优势计划和商业健康保险参保者中,与多种吸入器三联疗法相比,糠酸氟替卡松/乌美溴铵/维兰特罗三联疗法起始治疗后的结局。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2024 Jan 11;19:97-110. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S424497. eCollection 2024.
4
Treatment patterns and cost of exacerbations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease using multiple inhaler triple therapy in South Korea.韩国采用多种吸入器三联疗法治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者加重的治疗模式和费用。
Respir Res. 2022 Sep 5;23(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s12931-022-02136-0.
5
Clinical Characteristics, Treatment Persistence, and Outcomes Among Patients With COPD Treated With Single- or Multiple-Inhaler Triple Therapy: A Retrospective Analysis in Spain.在西班牙进行的一项回顾性分析:接受单一或多种吸入器三联疗法治疗 COPD 患者的临床特征、治疗持续性和结局。
Chest. 2022 Nov;162(5):1017-1029. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.06.033. Epub 2022 Jul 3.
6
Economic impact of delaying initiation with multiple-inhaler maintenance triple therapy in Spanish patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.多吸入器维持三联疗法治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病西班牙患者时延迟起始的经济影响。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019 Sep 12;14:2121-2129. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S211854. eCollection 2019.
7
Comparative Adherence and Persistence of Single- and Multiple-Inhaler Triple Therapies Among Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in an English Real-World Primary Care Setting.在英国真实世界初级保健环境中,慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者使用单药和多药三联吸入疗法的依从性和持久性比较。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2022 Sep 24;17:2417-2429. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S370540. eCollection 2022.
8
Outcomes of patients with COPD switching from multiple-inhaler to once-daily single-inhaler triple therapy in a real-world primary care setting in England: a retrospective pre-post cohort study.在英格兰的真实初级保健环境中,从多吸入器转换为每日一次的三联单吸入器治疗的 COPD 患者的结局:一项回顾性前后队列研究。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2024 May 21;11(1):e001890. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2023-001890.
9
Real-World Treatment Patterns of Multiple-Inhaler Triple Therapy Among Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in UK General Practice.英国普通实践中慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者多吸入器三联疗法的真实世界治疗模式。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2021 May 6;16:1255-1264. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S290773. eCollection 2021.
10
Treatment Patterns, Healthcare Utilization and Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Initiating Single-Inhaler Long-Acting β-Agonist/Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonist Dual Therapy in Primary Care in England.在英国初级保健中,接受单吸入长效β激动剂/长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂双重治疗的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的治疗模式、医疗保健利用和临床结局。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2023 Mar 5;18:231-245. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S389281. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Prompt versus Delayed Triple Therapy in COPD: Solutions to Time-Related Biases in Observational Studies.慢性阻塞性肺疾病中即时与延迟三联疗法:解决观察性研究中与时间相关的偏倚
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2025 Jul 5;20:2273-2285. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S527497. eCollection 2025.
2
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and the Management of Cardiopulmonary Risk in the UK: A Systematic Literature Review and Modified Delphi Study.慢性阻塞性肺疾病与英国心肺风险的管理:一项系统文献综述及改良德尔菲研究
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2025 Jun 25;20:2073-2090. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S523865. eCollection 2025.
3
Benefit of Prompt Vs Delayed Initiation of Triple Therapy Following an Exacerbation in Patients with COPD in Japan: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Triple Inhaled Therapy at Two Glucocorticoid Doses in Moderate-to-Very-Severe COPD.中重度至极重度 COPD 患者两种糖皮质激素剂量三联吸入治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jul 2;383(1):35-48. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1916046. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
2
Cost-Effectiveness Of Once-Daily Single-Inhaler Triple Therapy In COPD: The IMPACT Trial.慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)每日一次单吸入器三联疗法的成本效益:IMPACT试验
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019 Nov 29;14:2681-2695. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S216072. eCollection 2019.
3
Economic impact of delaying initiation with multiple-inhaler maintenance triple therapy in Spanish patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
日本 COPD 患者加重后即刻与延迟三联疗法对患者的获益:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2023 Dec 8;18:2933-2953. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S419119. eCollection 2023.
4
Benefit of prompt initiation of single-inhaler fluticasone furoate, umeclidinium, and vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) in patients with COPD in England following an exacerbation: a retrospective cohort study.在英国,COPD 患者在加重后立即使用单一吸入氟替卡松糠酸酯、乌美溴铵和维兰特罗(FF/UMEC/VI)的益处:一项回顾性队列研究。
Respir Res. 2023 Sep 25;24(1):229. doi: 10.1186/s12931-023-02523-1.
多吸入器维持三联疗法治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病西班牙患者时延迟起始的经济影响。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019 Sep 12;14:2121-2129. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S211854. eCollection 2019.
4
Impact of prompt versus delayed initiation of triple therapy post COPD exacerbation in a US-managed care setting.美国管理式医疗环境下 COPD 加重后即刻与延迟三联疗法起始对患者的影响。
Respir Med. 2018 Dec;145:138-144. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2018.10.013. Epub 2018 Oct 26.
5
Once-Daily Single-Inhaler Triple versus Dual Therapy in Patients with COPD.COPD 患者每日一次单吸入器三联与双联治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 3;378(18):1671-1680. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1713901. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
6
Assessing the healthcare resource use associated with inappropriate prescribing of inhaled corticosteroids for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in GOLD groups A or B: an observational study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD).评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)GOLD 组 A 或 B 患者中吸入皮质类固醇不合理处方相关的医疗资源使用情况:一项使用临床实践研究数据库(CPRD)的观察性研究。
Respir Res. 2018 Apr 11;19(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12931-018-0767-2.
7
Extrafine inhaled triple therapy versus dual bronchodilator therapy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (TRIBUTE): a double-blind, parallel group, randomised controlled trial.特布他林、布地奈德/福莫特罗和茚达特罗/格隆溴铵治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病(TRIBUTE)的随机对照双盲平行分组研究
Lancet. 2018 Mar 17;391(10125):1076-1084. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30206-X. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
8
Pneumonia risk with inhaled fluticasone furoate and vilanterol in COPD patients with moderate airflow limitation: The SUMMIT trial.中重度气流受限 COPD 患者使用糠酸氟替卡松/维兰特罗吸入剂的肺炎风险:SUMMIT 研究。
Respir Med. 2017 Oct;131:27-34. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2017.07.060. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
9
Erratum: Changes in initial COPD treatment choice over time and factors influencing prescribing decisions in UK primary care: a real-world study.勘误:英国初级医疗中慢性阻塞性肺疾病初始治疗选择随时间的变化及影响处方决策的因素:一项真实世界研究。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2017 Jun 8;27:17004. doi: 10.1038/npjpcrm.2017.4.
10
Single inhaler triple therapy versus inhaled corticosteroid plus long-acting β2-agonist therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (TRILOGY): a double-blind, parallel group, randomised controlled trial.三联吸入治疗与吸入性皮质类固醇加长效β2-激动剂治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病(TRILOGY):一项双盲、平行组、随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2016 Sep 3;388(10048):963-73. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31354-X. Epub 2016 Sep 1.