Boström K, Helander C G
Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien). 1986;36:51-5. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-8859-0_14.
Some principal differences of the head injury materal available to clinicians, hospital pathologists and forensic pathologists are discussed with reference to the primary and secondary findings at focal and diffuse brain injury and intracranial injuries after trauma. The importance of cooperative understanding between the different disciplines is stressed in order to cover the whole head injury pattern. Examples are given. The importance of intracranial arterial hemorrhages is stressed and may also be the cause of a particular group of acute subdural hematomas; it may be of special prognostic importance because of their probable availability to successful surgery in the acute stage. The cause may be a tearing of arterial connections between the peripheral branches of the middle cerebral artery and the dura. The diagnosis of different types of primary diffuse brain injury is discussed with particular reference to the non-satisfactory common histological methods of investigation early after trauma. Diffuse brain injury due to hypoxia at the trauma can be serious but give few macroscopical findings; disseminated intravasal coagulation can appear isolated in the brain or be part of a systemic manifestation.
结合创伤后局灶性和弥漫性脑损伤及颅内损伤的原发性和继发性发现,讨论了临床医生、医院病理学家和法医病理学家可获取的头部损伤材料的一些主要差异。强调了不同学科之间合作理解的重要性,以便涵盖整个头部损伤模式,并给出了示例。强调了颅内动脉出血的重要性,它也可能是特定一组急性硬膜下血肿的原因;由于其在急性期可能适合成功手术,所以可能具有特殊的预后重要性。其原因可能是大脑中动脉外周分支与硬脑膜之间的动脉连接撕裂。特别参考创伤后早期常用的组织学检查方法不尽人意的情况,讨论了不同类型原发性弥漫性脑损伤的诊断。创伤时因缺氧导致的弥漫性脑损伤可能很严重,但肉眼可见的表现很少;弥散性血管内凝血可能单独出现在大脑中,也可能是全身表现的一部分。