Suppr超能文献

EUS 引导下胰腺积液的引流,采用改良的单纯使用切开刀而不使用 FNA 针的技术。

EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collection, using a modified technique of cystotome alone without a FNA needle.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.

出版信息

Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2021 Sep-Oct;27(5):283-288. doi: 10.4103/sjg.sjg_132_21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage for pancreatic fluid collection (PFC) involves puncture with a fine-needle aspiration (FNA) needle, followed by tract dilation involving exchange of multiple accessories, and finally deployment of stent. The procedure is time consuming and carries a risk of loss of wire access and hence technical failure. We used a modified technique with a 10-F cystotome alone instead of a FNA needle and dilators.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed records of consecutive patients who had undergone EUS-guided drainage of PFC using a modified technique, with puncture of PFC using a 10-Fcystotome, followed by passage of a guidewire through it into the PFC cavity and deployment of a biflanged, 2-cm-long, fully covered self-expanding metal stent over it. Technical and clinical success rates and procedure time were assessed.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients underwent PFC drainage, median age was 35 (12-76), and 35 (77.8%) were males. The median (range) duration of symptoms was 125 (38-1080) days, while the median PFC size was 11.8 × 11 × 11 cm, and the follow-up period after stent removal was 111 ± 72 (18-251) weeks. The procedure took 10 (8-12) min and had technical and clinical success rates of 100 and 97.8%, respectively. Minor complications occurred in six (13.3%) patients, while recurrence occurred in one.

CONCLUSION

EUS-guided drainage of PFC using a cystotome is a quick, effective and safe procedure. It may also be less expensive since it obviates the use of FNA needles and dilators, and is likely to be a useful alternative to the conventional technique.

摘要

背景

内镜超声(EUS)引导下引流胰腺液收集(PFC)包括用细针抽吸(FNA)针进行穿刺,然后进行通道扩张,涉及多次更换附件,最后部署支架。该过程耗时且存在导丝丢失风险,因此存在技术失败的风险。我们使用了一种改良技术,仅使用 10-F 囊肿切开刀代替 FNA 针和扩张器。

方法

我们回顾性分析了连续接受 EUS 引导下 PFC 引流改良技术治疗的患者记录,使用 10-F 囊肿切开刀穿刺 PFC,然后将导丝穿过囊肿进入 PFC 腔,并在其上部署双凸缘、2 厘米长、完全覆盖的自膨式金属支架。评估了技术和临床成功率以及手术时间。

结果

45 例患者接受了 PFC 引流,中位年龄为 35 岁(12-76 岁),35 例(77.8%)为男性。中位(范围)症状持续时间为 125 天(38-1080 天),PFC 大小中位数为 11.8×11×11cm,支架取出后随访期为 111±72 周(18-251 周)。手术时间为 10 分钟(8-12 分钟),技术成功率和临床成功率分别为 100%和 97.8%。6 例(13.3%)患者出现轻微并发症,1 例患者复发。

结论

EUS 引导下使用囊肿切开刀引流 PFC 是一种快速、有效、安全的方法。由于它避免了使用 FNA 针和扩张器,因此可能更具成本效益,并且可能是传统技术的有用替代方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d8b/8555769/2c37df9fc547/SJG-27-283-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验