Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Department of Pathology & Clinical Labs, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Diagn Cytopathol. 2022 Jan;50(1):34-45. doi: 10.1002/dc.24890. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
Digital pathology has widened pathologists' opportunities to examine both surgical and cytological samples. Recently, portable mobile devices like tablets and smartphones have been tested for application with digital technologies including static, dynamic, and more recently whole slide imaging. This study aimed to review the published literature on the impact of mobile devices on cancer diagnoses in cytology. This analysis focused on their diagnostic potential, technical details, critical issues and pitfalls, and economical aspects.
A systematic search was carried out in the electronic databases Embase and PubMed. Studies dealing with the application of mobile devices for diagnosing cancer on cytological specimens were included. The quality of studies was assessed with the QUADAS-2 tool. The main themes addressed were the comparison of manual examination with light microscopy and the use of mobile tools for primary diagnosis. The technical features of different models of smartphones and tablets, software, and adapters were also studied in terms of feasibility and costs-analysis.
Of 2458 retrieved articles, 18 were included. Concordance with light microscopy was good and diagnostic performance comparable with an expert pathologist's diagnosis. The mobile devices studied differed, sometimes significantly, in terms of speed and cost. The utility was improved by employing specifically designed adapters. Image acquisition and transmission represent the main critical points in almost all studies.
The use of mobile devices demonstrated promising results regarding the digital evaluation of cytological samples. Widespread adoption even in underserved areas is anticipated following validation studies, technology improvements, and reduction in the costs.
数字病理学拓宽了病理学家检查外科和细胞学样本的机会。最近,平板电脑和智能手机等便携式移动设备已经过测试,可与数字技术(包括静态、动态以及最近的全切片成像)一起使用。本研究旨在回顾有关移动设备在细胞学癌症诊断中应用的文献。该分析侧重于它们的诊断潜力、技术细节、关键问题和陷阱,以及经济方面。
在 Embase 和 PubMed 电子数据库中进行了系统搜索。纳入了涉及移动设备在细胞学标本上诊断癌症应用的研究。使用 QUADAS-2 工具评估研究质量。主要主题是手动检查与光学显微镜的比较以及移动工具在初级诊断中的应用。还研究了不同型号的智能手机和平板电脑、软件和适配器的技术特点,包括可行性和成本分析。
在检索到的 2458 篇文章中,有 18 篇被纳入。与光学显微镜的一致性很好,诊断性能与专家病理学家的诊断相当。所研究的移动设备在速度和成本方面存在差异,有时差异很大。通过使用专门设计的适配器,可以提高实用性。图像采集和传输几乎是所有研究中的主要关键点。
移动设备在细胞学样本的数字评估方面显示出有前景的结果。在验证研究、技术改进和降低成本后,预计将在服务不足的地区广泛采用。