• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重新思考农用化学品安全评估:一个视角。

Rethinking agrochemical safety assessment: A perspective.

机构信息

National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs), Gibbs Building, 215 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BE, UK.

Syngenta Ltd., Jealott's Hill International Research Centre, Bracknell, Berkshire, UK.

出版信息

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2021 Dec;127:105068. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2021.105068. Epub 2021 Oct 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.yrtph.2021.105068
PMID:34678328
Abstract

Agrochemical safety assessment has traditionally relied on the use of animals for toxicity testing, based on scientific understanding and test guidelines developed in the 1980s. However, since then, there have been significant advances in the toxicological sciences that have improved our understanding of mechanisms underpinning adverse human health effects. The time is ripe to 'rethink' approaches used for human safety assessments of agrochemicals to ensure they reflect current scientific understanding and increasingly embrace new opportunities to improve human relevance and predictivity, and to reduce the reliance on animals. Although the ultimate aim is to enable a paradigm shift and an overhaul of global regulatory data requirements, there is much that can be done now to ensure new opportunities and approaches are adopted and implemented within the current regulatory frameworks. This commentary reviews current initiatives and emerging opportunities to embrace new approaches to improve agrochemical safety assessment for humans, and considers various endpoints and initiatives (including acute toxicity, repeat dose toxicity studies, carcinogenicity, developmental and reproductive toxicity, exposure-driven approaches, inhalation toxicity, and data modelling). Realistic aspirations to improve safety assessment, incorporate new technologies and reduce reliance on animal testing without compromising protection goals are discussed.

摘要

农药安全性评估传统上依赖于使用动物进行毒性测试,这是基于 20 世纪 80 年代发展起来的科学理解和测试指南。然而,自那时以来,毒理学科学取得了重大进展,加深了我们对不良人类健康影响的潜在机制的理解。现在是时候“重新思考”用于农药人类安全性评估的方法了,以确保它们反映当前的科学认识,并越来越多地利用新的机会来提高人类相关性和预测性,并减少对动物的依赖。虽然最终目标是实现范式转变和全面改革全球监管数据要求,但现在可以做很多工作来确保在当前监管框架内采用和实施新的机会和方法。本评论审查了当前的倡议和新兴机会,以采用新方法来改善人类的农药安全性评估,并考虑了各种终点和倡议(包括急性毒性、重复剂量毒性研究、致癌性、发育和生殖毒性、暴露驱动方法、吸入毒性和数据建模)。讨论了在不损害保护目标的情况下,提高安全性评估、采用新技术和减少对动物测试的依赖的现实愿望。

相似文献

1
Rethinking agrochemical safety assessment: A perspective.重新思考农用化学品安全评估:一个视角。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2021 Dec;127:105068. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2021.105068. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
2
GHS additivity formula: A true replacement method for acute systemic toxicity testing of agrochemical formulations.全球化学品统一分类和标签制度(GHS)相加性公式:一种用于农药制剂急性全身毒性测试的真正替代方法。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2016 Dec;82:99-110. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2016.10.007. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
3
Utilizing relative potency factors (RPF) and threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) concepts to assess hazard and human risk assessment profiles of environmental metabolites: a case study.利用相对效力因子(RPF)和毒理学关注阈值(TTC)概念评估环境代谢物的危害和人类风险评估概况:一个案例研究
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2015 Mar;71(2):301-17. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.12.010. Epub 2015 Jan 10.
4
A comprehensive view on mechanistic approaches for cancer risk assessment of non-genotoxic agrochemicals.非遗传毒性农药致癌风险评估的机制方法的综合观点。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2020 Dec;118:104789. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104789. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
5
Rethinking chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity assessment for agrochemicals project (ReCAAP): A reporting framework to support a weight of evidence safety assessment without long-term rodent bioassays.重新思考农用化学品项目的慢性毒性和致癌性评估(ReCAAP):支持证据权重安全性评估而无需长期啮齿动物生物测定的报告框架。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2022 Jun;131:105160. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2022.105160. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
6
Towards achieving a modern science-based paradigm for agrochemical carcinogenicity assessment.迈向实现基于现代科学的农业化学品致癌性评估范式。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2023 Jan;137:105301. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2022.105301. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
7
Application of a novel integrated toxicity testing strategy incorporating "3R" principles of animal research to evaluate the safety of a new agrochemical sulfoxaflor.新型一体化毒性测试策略的应用,结合动物研究的“3R”原则,评估新农药砜虫酰胺的安全性。
Crit Rev Toxicol. 2014 May;44 Suppl 2:1-14. doi: 10.3109/10408444.2014.910753.
8
Aligning the 3Rs with new paradigms in the safety assessment of chemicals.使“3R原则”与化学品安全评估的新范式保持一致。
Toxicology. 2015 Apr 1;330:62-6. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2015.01.014.
9
Regulatory Acceptance of Alternative Methods in the Development and Approval of Pharmaceuticals.药品研发与审批中替代方法的监管认可。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016;856:33-64. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-33826-2_3.
10
The way forward in reproductive/developmental toxicity testing.生殖/发育毒性测试的未来发展方向。
Altern Lab Anim. 2009 Dec;37(6):641-56. doi: 10.1177/026119290903700609.

引用本文的文献

1
Key attributes of health and environmental risk decision-making: A scoping review.健康与环境风险决策的关键属性:一项范围综述。
Risk Anal. 2025 Jul;45(7):1926-1939. doi: 10.1111/risa.17715. Epub 2025 Feb 2.
2
Transcriptomic point of departure determination: a comparison of distribution-based and gene set-based approaches.转录组出发阈值的确定:基于分布法和基于基因集法的比较
Front Genet. 2024 May 9;15:1374791. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1374791. eCollection 2024.
3
Advances in tissue engineering and biofabrication for skin modeling.
用于皮肤建模的组织工程与生物制造进展。
Bioprinting. 2023 Nov;35. doi: 10.1016/j.bprint.2023.e00306. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
4
Transforming the evaluation of agrochemicals.转变农化品评估方式。
Pest Manag Sci. 2022 Dec;78(12):5049-5056. doi: 10.1002/ps.7148. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
5
A Transformative Vision for an Omics-Based Regulatory Chemical Testing Paradigm.基于组学的监管化学测试范式的变革性愿景。
Toxicol Sci. 2022 Nov 23;190(2):127-132. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfac097.
6
Use of transcriptomics in hazard identification and next generation risk assessment: A case study with clothianidin.使用转录组学进行危害识别和下一代风险评估:以噻虫嗪为例。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2022 Aug;166:113212. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2022.113212. Epub 2022 Jun 8.